Author

  • Reza Raissi

    • Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

Nowadays most of the scholars in the field of foreign/second language learning emphasized on the role of peer-reviewing and students’ feedback to each other’s work in writing composition. In many educational systems different educational reformations have been happened and many educational systems in the field of foreign/second language teaching changed the English teaching methods from old language teachings like Audio-lingual Method (ALM) and Grammar Translation Method (GTM) to modern language teaching methods like Task Based Language Teaching (TBLT) and Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). In CLT approach it has been emphasized that students should work with each other in group or pair work and the role of the teacher is as a facilitator or coachin order to push the students to discuss and challenge in the classroom; that walks around the class and gives feedback to the students’ works. In this study researcher used a quasi-experimental research design in which he had two different groups namely experimental and control groups. Students at the experimental group received peer-review writing instruction and feedback while students in the control group did not. Results of the study showed that peer-review of students can increase students’ writing proficiency to a high extent. At the end of the study some pedagogical implications have been suggested by the researcher which can help researchers in this field.

Keywords

References

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). Written language, standard language, global language . World Englishes, 22(4) 405-418.
  • Juzwik, M. M., Curcic, S., Wolbers, K., Moxley, K. D., Dimling, L. M. & Shankland, R. K. (2006). Writing into the 21st century: An overview of research on writing, 1999 to 2004. Written Communication, 23, 451476.
  • Kushner, E. (2003). English as global language: Problems, dangers, opportunities. Diogenes , 50(2), 17-23.
  • Matsuda, P. K. (2003). Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In Exploring the Dynamics of Second Language Writing B. Kroll (Ed.) (pp. 15-34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • McCombs, B. L. (1997). Self-assessment and reflection: Tools for promoting teacher changes toward learnercentered practices. NASSP Bulletin, 81, 1-14.
  • Saito, H. & Fujita, T. (2009).Peer-assessing peers’ contribution to EFL group presentations. RELC Journal , 40(2), 149-171.
  • Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 143-159.
  • Taylor, L. & Wigglesworth, G. (2009). Are two heads better than one: Pair works in L2assessment contexts? Language Testing, 26(3), 325-339.
  • Wigglesworth, G. & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445-466.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Raissi, R. (2012). On the Relationship of Peer-Review Training and Writing Proficiency among Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 3(12), 399-403. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v3i12.91

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2012-12-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Education and Vocational Research welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission