Author

  • Niina M.E. Valtaranta

    • HAMK University of Applied Sciences, Finland
    • Finland

Abstract

The objective of the research was to examine the experience world of professionals in the field of technology as users of foreign languages to illustrate the general meaning structure in the agency of a foreign language user. The theoretical framework of this research was phenomenological. The fieldwork was carried out through thematic interviews with seven interviewees in a medium-sized Finnish engineering company with international operations. Through a phenomenological method of analysis the individual meaning units were identified. Out of these individual meaning units a common meaning structure that reflected the experiences of all the interviewees was uncovered. Face-to-face communication and social positioning manifested as common meaning units, significant elements forming this structure in the accounts of the interviewees. Thus the findings of this research project suggest that in foreign language education special attention should be paid on establishing oral communication and thereby nurturing interactive communication skills in the students, instead of focusing on providing web-based language education.

Keywords

References

  • Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (V.W. McGee, Trans.) Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Berne, E. (1964). Games people play. The psychology of human relationships. Brattleboro: The Book Press.
  • Carbaugh, D. (1996). Situating selves. The communication of social identities in American scenes. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Council of Europe. (2001). CEFR. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dannels, D. P. & Housley-Gaffney, A. L. (2009). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: A call for scholarly cross-curricular advocacy. Communication Education , 58, 124–153.
  • Darling, A. L. & Dannels, D. P. (2003). Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk: A report on the role of oral communication in the workplace. Communication Education , 52(1), 1-16.
  • Du-Bois, J. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed .). Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Retrieved 18 February 2012 from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/tampere/Doc?id=10196558&ppg=151
  • Davies, B. & Harré, R. (1990).Positioning: The discursive production of selve. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20, 43-63.
  • Dreyfus, H. & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: The Free Press.
  • Eisenberg, E. M. (2001). Building a mystery: towards a new theory of communication and identity. Journal of Communication , 2, 534– 52.
  • Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology , 28, 235–260.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. London: Harper and Row.
  • Harré, R. & van Langenhove, L. (1999). (Eds.). Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Malden: Blackwell.
  • Hausendorf, H. & Bora, A. (Eds.). (2006). Analysing Citizenship Talk: Social Positioning in Political and Legal Decision-Making Processes. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Retrieved 7 January 2012 from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/tampere/Doc?id=10126045&ppg=18
  • Hermans, H. & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory. Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hill, A., Rivers, D. & Watson, J. (2008). Key Themes in Interpersonal Communication: Culture, Identities and Performance. Buckingham: Open University Press. Retrieved January 20, 2012 from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/hamk/Doc?id=10229862&ppg=204
  • Hougaard, A. & Hougaard, G. (2009). Fused bodies: Sense-making as a phenomenon of interacting, knowledgeable, social bodies. In Pishwa, H. (Ed.).Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs: Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Retrieved 12 February, 2012 from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/tampere/Doc?id=10329822&ppg=56
  • Kahneman, D. & Klein, G. (2009).Conditions for intuitive expertise. A failure to disagree. In American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526.
  • Kinchin, I. & Cabot, L. (2010).Reconsidering the dimensions of expertise: from linear stages towards dual processing. In London Review of Education , 8(2), 153–166.
  • Ministry of Education and Culture. (2011). Koulutusjatutkimusvuosina 2011-2016, Kehittämissuunnitelma [Education and research during years 2011-2016.A development plan] Retrieved January 7, 2012.[discontinuedURL] http://www.minedu.fi/export/sites/default/OPM/Koulutus/koulutuspolitii kka/asiakirjat/Ke su_2011_2016_fi.pdf
  • Perttula, J. (2000). Kokemuksesta tiedoksi: fenomenologisen metodin uudelleen muotoilua. Kasvatus 31(5), 428–442.
  • Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and being. Essays by Michael Polanyi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Turner, J. (2002). Face to face: Toward a sociological theory of interpersonal behavior. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  • Weizman, E. (2008 ). Positioning in media dialogue : Negotiating roles in the news interview. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Retrieved 10 February 2012 from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/tampere/Doc?id=10269366&ppg=30

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Valtaranta, N. M. (2012). Face-to-Face Communication and Social Positioning in the Experience World of Finnish Technical Professionals. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 3(12), 404-414. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v3i12.92

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2012 Niina M.E. Valtaranta (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 3 No. 12 (2012) Language, Communication & Professional Skills View issue contents

Published

2012-12-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Education and Vocational Research welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission