Abstract
This paper investigates the ability of supplying the elliptical items omitted from a written text and its impact on the reading comprehension of Libyan university students studying EFL. Ellipsis can be defined as the omission of one or more lexical items that are understood in the context, but which are required to make the sentence or utterance grammatically correct. An elliptical item could be nominal, verbal or clausal. 4th year English Department students from the English Department- Faculty of ArtsGharian in Al-Jabal Al-Gharbi University completed reading comprehension test. Seventy one out of a hundred and four students accepted to participate in the study. The test was modified to include many elliptical items and the students were asked to supply them. The results, which were statistically analyzed, suggested that the study participants were not able to supply the correct elliptical items and consequently had poor reading comprehension results. The mean marks achieved were only 33.8. This result may have many pedagogical implications.
Keywords
- E llipsis Search this journal for E llipsis (opens in a new tab)
- Nominal Search this journal for Nominal (opens in a new tab)
- Verbal Search this journal for Verbal (opens in a new tab)
- Clausal Search this journal for Clausal (opens in a new tab)
- Reading Comprehension Search this journal for Reading Comprehension (opens in a new tab)
References
- Chapman, L. J. (1983). Reading development and cohesion. UK: Heinemann Educational Books.
- Davie, K. G. (2011). Functional Redundancy and Ellipsis as Strategies in Reading and Writing. Utah State University , 15(3).
- Halliday, M. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
- Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Innajih, A. (2012). The Effect of Recognizing the Lexical Cohesive Relations of Written Text on the Reading Comprehension of Libyan University Students Studying English as a Foreign Language. ICERI 2012 conference, Madrid (Spain) 19th -21st of November 2012.
- Monson, D. (1982). Effect of Type and Direction on Comprehension of anaphoric Relationships. ERIC No. ED 298003.
- Muto, K. (2007). The use of lexical cohesion in reading and writing. Available at: Library.nakanishi.ac.jp/ p.107-129.
Downloads
No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.
How to Cite
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Abdussalam A. Annajeh (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
Keywords
- E llipsis Search this journal for E llipsis (opens in a new tab)
- Nominal Search this journal for Nominal (opens in a new tab)
- Verbal Search this journal for Verbal (opens in a new tab)
- Clausal Search this journal for Clausal (opens in a new tab)
- Reading Comprehension Search this journal for Reading Comprehension (opens in a new tab)
Section
Published
Submissions
Have research to publish? Journal of Education and Vocational Research welcomes submissions.
Make a Submission