Author

  • Katalin Fehér

    • School of Communication, Taylor's University, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

We have identities and we can communicate online on the internet and in social networks. The question is how we can define and manage social roles/online representations on digital platforms and in social media? “Digital identity” is in the focus in this exploratory phase of our research the aim of which has been to map how identity refers to a driver in a digital setting with digital footprints, visibility or nonvisibility, professionalism and privacy in online publicity. Our empirical research has been trying to explore this phenomenon of the digital media for online personal strategy with segmentation. The first exploratory phase focused on the students’ segment prior to initial employment. We were wondering which points of decision were relevant in digital identity strategy for them and how they would replace their strategy consciously prior to employment. We had a qualitative research with semi-structured interviews. Our results show that digital identity phenomena define social roles/online strategies and representations on digital platforms and in social media. Members of the research segment have some strategies to manage their digital footprints. They would like to change their profile from “student” to that of a “professional” assuming less activity in digital context.

Keywords

References

  • Aaltonen, A., Huuskonen, P. & Lehikoinen, J. (2005). Context awareness perspectives for mobile personal media. Information Systems Management , 22(4), 43-55.
  • Adler, R. B., Rosenfeld, L. B. & Proctor, R. F. (2010). Interplay: The process of interpersonal communication (11th Ed.) New York: Oxford.
  • Allwood, C. M. & Selart, M. (2001). Decision Making: Social and Creative Dimensions. Kluwer: Amsterdam.
  • Backhouse, J. & Halperin, R. (2012). Trust, risk and eID: Exploring public perceptions of digital identity systems. First Monday, 17(4), 1-5.
  • Bauer, M. W. & Gaskell, G. (2007). Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound . London: Sage.
  • Blanchard, A. & Markus, L. (2007). Technology and community behavior in online environments, presented at the 3rd International Conference on Communities and Technologies, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI, June 28–30.
  • Birchmeier, Z., Joinson A. N. & Dietz-Uhler, B. (2005). Storming and forming a normative response to a deception revealed online. Computers in Human Behavior , 23(1), 108-121.
  • Buss, A. & Strauss, N. (2009). Online Communities Handbook . Berkeley: New Riders.
  • Davies, J. (2007). Display, Identity and the Everyday: Self-presentation through online image sharing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education , 28(4), 549-564.
  • Dellarocas, C. (2010). Online Reputation Systems: How to Design One That Does What You Need. Sloan Management Review , 51(3), 33-38.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
  • Gonzales, A. & Hancock, J. T. (2008). Identity shift in computer-mediated environments. Media Psychology , 11(2), 167–85.
  • Kennedy, G., Krause, K. L., Gray, K., Judd, T., Bennett, S., Maton K., Dalgarno, B. & Bishop, A. (2006). Questioning the next generation: A collaborative project in Australian higher education. Proceedings of the 23rd annual ascilite conference: Who’s learning? Whose technology? In. Markauskaite, L., Goodyear, P., & Reimann, P. (Eds) Who's Learning?, Whose Technology?, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 413-417). Sydney, ASCILITE.
  • Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyber psychology. Behavior and Social Networking, 13, 1–8.
  • Resnyansky, L. (2010). Online identity as a semiotic phenomenon. In K. Michael (Ed) Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society: Social Implications of Emerging Technologies, 7-9 June 2010, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Schawbel, D. (2009). Me 2.0 . New York: Kaplan.
  • Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy , 19(1), 7–25.
  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979).An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In L.W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. (pp. 321 – 333). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel& L.W. Austin (Eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 481 – 503). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Fehér, K. (2013). How do Higher Education Students manage their Digital Footprints before Finding a Job? Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 4(12), 354-360. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v4i12.141

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2013-12-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Education and Vocational Research welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission