Author

  • Vi Hoang Dang

    • Vocational Education - Namdinh Vocational College - Vietnam
    • University of New England - Australia
    • Viet Nam

Abstract

The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured process to gather information from a group. The technique was first described in early 1970s and has since become a widely-used standard to facilitate working groups. The NGT is effective for generating large numbers of creative new ideas and for group priority setting. This article reports on a case study carried out in Vietnam on exploring the perceptions of key stakeholders towards the vocational education training (VET) sector where the study will apply the NGT. Therefore, this article has two purposes: (1) describing what NGT is and outlines how to use it; and (2) describing the case study findings by providing an analysis of data generated during a workshop led by the author. The findings of the case study indicated that the Government policy factor or the roles of Government on the VET sector are ranked as the most important force impacting upon the quality of VET programs in Vietnam. Both the established research technique used to collect data and present the findings of the case study have particular significance as they contribute to a major problem which has not been researched seriously in Vietnam in the past as has happened in many other countries. Importantly, the study provides an overview of the Vietnamese VET system which both VET experts in Vietnam and international scholars will be able to understand.

Keywords

References

  • Asian Development Bank, (ADB). (2013). Viet Nam: Vocational and Technical Education Project. Retrieved from http://www.adb.org/documents/viet-nam-vocational-and-technical-education-project.
  • Bellenger, D. N., Bernhardt, K. L. & Goldstucker, J. L. (1976). Qualitative Research in Marketing, Chicago: American Marketing Association.
  • Bogdan, R. & Taylor, S. J. (1975). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Brahm, C. & Kleiner, B. H. (1996). Advantages and disadvantages of group decision-making approaches. Team Performance Management: An International Journal , 2(1), 30-35.
  • Bui, V. G. (2014). Họcnghề: Con đườngmònngoằnnghèothiếu an toàn? Retrieved from http://hanoimoi.com.vn/Tin-tuc/Huong-nghiep/653147/hoc-nghe-con-duong-mon-ngoanngheo-thieu-an-toan.
  • Calder, B. J. (1977). Focus Groups and the Nature of Qualitative Marketing Research. Journal of Marketing Research , 14, 353 64.
  • Carney, O., McIntosh, J. & Worth, A. (1996). The use of the Nominal Group Technique in research with community nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing , 23(5), 1024-1029.
  • Cao, V. S. (2015). 'Trườngnghềkhôngtuyển sinh được do chấtlượnghạnchế'. Retrieved from http://vnexpress.net/tintuc/giao-duc/truong-nghe-khong-tuyen-sinh-duoc-do-chat-luong-hanche 3134427.html.
  • Dang, H. V. & Hathaway, T. (2014). Vietnamese Students’ Perception and Loyalty towards an Image of Vocational Education and Training. Journal of Education and Vocational Research , 5(4), 228238.
  • Dang, H. V. (2015). Parental Perspectives towards the Vocational Education Training Sector in Vietnam. Journal of Education and Vocational Research , 6(1), 37-51.
  • De-Ruyter, K. (1996). Focus versus nominal group interviews: a comparative analysis. Marketing Intelligence & Planning , 14(6), 44-50.
  • General Directorate of Vocational Training (GDVT). (2011). Báocáodạynghề 2011. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/tinhanhvy/bo-co-dy-ngh-vit-nam-2011.
  • Harvey, N. & Holmes, C. A. (2012). Nominal group technique: An effective method for obtaining group consensus. International Journal of Nursing Practice , 18(2), 188-194.
  • Higginbotham, J. B. & Cox, K. K. (1979). Focus Group Interviews: A Reader. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
  • Hoang, N. V. (2014). Giáodụcnghềnghiệp: Chưahếtnhứcnhối. Retrieved from http://www.daidoanket.vn/PrintPreview.aspx?ID=95698.
  • Horton, J. N. (1980). Nominal group technique: A method of decision-making by committee.Anaesthesia, 35(8), 811–814.
  • McMurra y, A. R. (1994). Three Decision–making Aids: Brainstorming, Nominal Group and Delphi Technique.Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 10(2), 62-65.
  • Mays, N. & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320(72), 50-52.
  • Ministry of Labor Invalid Social Affair (MOLISA). (2014). Bản tin cậpnhậtthịtrườnglaođộngViệt Nam, số 2, quí 2 năm2014. Retrieved from http://www.molisa.gov.vn/Images/FileAnPham/fileanpham2014771436556.pdf.
  • Ministry of Education and Training (MOET). (2013). Thốngkếgiáodụcnăm 2013. Retrieved from http://www.moet.gov.vn/?page=11.11&view=5251.
  • Nelson, J . S., Jayanthi, M., Brittain, C. S., Epstein, M. H. & Bursuck, W. D. (2002). Using the Nominal Group Technique for homework communication decisions.Remedial and Special Education, 23(6), 379-386.
  • Nguyen, M. T. ( 2014). 72000 ngườitha ́tnghie ̣pvà tráchnhie ̣mcủangànhgiáodục . Retrieved from http://www.giaoducvietnam.vn/Giao-duc-24h/72000-nguoi-that-nghiep-va-trach-nhiem-cua- nganh-giao-duc-post144781.gd
  • Nguyen, N. P. (2014). Chínhsáchchongườihọcnghềphảitốthơn! Retrieved from http://cdn.ptit.edu.vn/tin- tuc-su kien/chinh-sach-cho-ng%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Di-h%E1%BB%8Dc-ngh%E1%BB%81- ph%E1%BA%A3i-t%E1%BB%91t-h%C6%A1n/
  • Nguyen, T. D. (2015). Thayđổinhậnthứcchọnnghềchocảhọc sinh vàphụhuynh. Retrieved from http://www.thanhnien.com.vn/giao-duc/thay-doi-nhan-thuc-chon-nghe-cho-ca-hoc-sinh-va- phu-huynh-527318.html.
  • Pham, X . T. (2015). Pháttriểnđộingũgiáoviêndạynghềgópphầnđổimớicănbản, toàndiệnnềngiáodục Việt Nam. Retrieved from http://tuyengiao.vn/Home/MagazineContent?ID=1394.
  • Pokorny , L. & Lyle, K. (1988). Introducing a modified nominal group technique for issue identification. Evaluation Practice, 9(2), 40-43.
  • So GiaoD uc Dao Tao Hanoi (GDDT Hanoi). (2014). HàNội: 71,278 HS đăngkýdựthivàolớp 10. Retrieved from http://news.vn/giaoduc/tuyen-sinh/329872-Ha-Noi-71.278-HS-dang-ky-du-thi-vao-lop- 10.html.
  • Steven, L Steward, . M. C. & Mary, A. Y. V. G. (2003). Organizational behaviour. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson. B. (2001). Using Nominal Group Technique to Explore Competence in Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy Students during First-Year Placements.British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(6), 298–304.
  • Van de Varga-At Ven, A. & Delbecq, A. L. (1971). Nominal versus Interacting Group Processes for Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness.Academy of Management Journal, 14 (2), 203 -212. kins, T., Bunyan, N., McIsaac, J. & Fewtrell, J. (2011). The Nominal Group Technique: a practical guide for facilitators. Written for the ELESIG Small Grants Scheme, University of Liverpool, October, Version 1.0.
  • Vella, K., Goldfrad, C., Rowan, K., Bion, J. & Black, N. (2000). Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical care.British Medical Journal, 320(7240), 976-980.
  • Vu, D . D. (2015). Đổimớitoàndiệndạynghềđảmbảoan sinh xãhội. Retrieved from http://tcdn.gov.vn/AIAdmin/News/View/tabid/66/newsid/5941/seo/Pho-Thu-tuong-Vu- Duc-Dam-Doi-moi-toan-dien-day-nghe-dam-bao-an-sinh-xa-hoi/Default.aspx.
  • Vu, X. H . (2013). Thựctrạngthihànhphápluậtdạynghềvàkiếnnghịcácnội dung cầnsửađổi, bổ sung vào luậtdạynghề. Retrieved from http://khcn.molisa.gov.vn/doc/Tom%20tat%20De%20tai.pdf.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Dang, V. H. (2015). Using the Nominal Group Technique to Explore Key Stakeholders’ Perceptions towards Vocational Education Training in Vietnam. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 6(2), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v6i2.184

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2015-06-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Education and Vocational Research welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission