Author

  • Abdool Qaiyum Mohabuth

    • University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius
    • Mauritius

  • Syed Munir Ahmad

    • University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan
    • Pakistan

Abstract

Summative assessment aims at providing measurement of student's understanding. It is argued that summative assessment is used for reporting and reviewing, besides providing an overall judgment of achievement. While summative assessment is a well defined process for learning that takes place in the classroom environment, its application within the Work-based Learning (WBL) practice environment is still being structured. This paper discusses the effectiveness of summative assessment in WBL practice from a mixed-method research study involving both quantitative and qualitative analysis. A survey questionnaire was designed for exploring the perceptions of mentors and students about summative assessment in WBL practice. The questionnaire was administered to the University of Mauritius students and mentors who supervised students for their WBL practice at the respective placement settings. Some students were also interviewed to capture their views and experiences about the application of summative assessment in WBL practice. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted with three experienced mentors who have assessed students on WBL practice. Findings reveal that most students had positive experiences about their summative assessments in WBL practice. They felt comfortable and confident to be assessed by their mentors in their placement settings and wished that the effort and time that they devoted to their learning be recognized and valued. Mentors also confirmed that summative assessment is a valid and reliable strategy in WBL practice, enabling them to better monitor and coach students to achieve the expected learning outcomes.

Keywords

References

  • Ashworth, P. & Saxton, J. (1990). On Competence. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 14(2), 3-25.
  • Brennan, J. & Little, B. (1996). A Review of Work Based Learning in Higher Education Sheffield. Department for Education and Employment. Sheffield.
  • Cameron-Jones, M. & O’Hara, P. (1994). What employers want to read about new teachers? Journal of Education for Teaching , 20(2), 203-214.
  • Coll, R. K., Taylor, N. & Grainger, S. (2002). Assessment of work based learning: Some lessons from the teaching profession. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education , 3(1), 5-12.
  • Dalrymple, R., Kemp, C. & Smith, P. (2014) Characterizing work-based learning as a triadic learning Endeavour. Journal of Further and Higher Education , 38(1), 75-89.
  • Eames, C. & Cates, C. (2011). Theories of learning in cooperative education and work-integrated learning. In R. K. Coll & K.E. Zegwaard (Eds.). International handbook for cooperative education and workintegrated learning: International perspectives of Theory, Research and Practice 2nd Ed, 37‐47. Lowell, MA: World Association for Cooperative Education.
  • Eraut, M. (2004a). Transfer of knowledge between education and workplace settings. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.). Workplace learning in context. 201–221. London: Routledge.
  • Eraut, M. (2004b). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education , 26(2), 173–247.
  • Foster, E. & Stephenson, J. (1998). Work based learning in Universities in the UK: a review of current practice and trends. Higher Education Research and Development , 12(2), 155-70.
  • Greenbank, P. (2002). Undergraduate work experience: an alternative approach using micro businesses. Education and Training , 44(6), 261-70.
  • Hager, P. (1998). Understanding workplace learning: General perspectives. In D. Boud (Ed.). Current issues and new agendas in workplace learning. 31–46. Springfield, VA: NCVER.
  • Hager, P. (2004). The conceptualization and measurement of learning at work. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.). Workplace learning in context 242–258. London: Routledge.
  • Hardern, G. (1995). The development of standards of competence in accounting. Accounting Education , 4, 1728.
  • Harlen, W. & Crick, R. D. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students’ motivation for learning (EPPI-Centre Review). In Research Evidence in Education Library, Issue 1. London: Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre. Social Science Research Unit. Institute of Education.
  • Hodges, D., Eames, C. & Coll, R. K. (2014). Theoretical perspectives on assessment in cooperative education placements. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education , 15(3), 189-207
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Marsick, V. J. & Watkins, K. E. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London: Routledge.
  • Moreland, N. (2005). Work Related Learning in Higher Education, Learning and Employability Series Two. HEA, York.
  • Mehrens, W. & Lehmann, I. J. (2011). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology (4th edn.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
  • Nixon, I., Smith, K., Stafford, R. & Camm, S. (2006). Work Based Learning: Illuminating the Higher Education Landscape. Final Report, July, Higher Education Academy, HEAYork.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Mohabuth, A. Q., & Ahmad, S. M. (2015). The Effectiveness of Summative Assessment in Work-Based Learning Practice. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 6(3), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v6i3.199

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Abdool Qaiyum Mohabuth, Syed Munir Ahmad (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2015) Science Practicum, eLearning & Work-Based Learning View issue contents

Published

2015-09-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Education and Vocational Research welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission