Author

  • Mohd Akhir Hj Ahmad

    • University Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Rushami ZienYusoff

    • University Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

The application of Quality, Cost and Delivery (QCD) practices in science management has made a significant impact both in industrial and academia for over the last decade. Fostered by rapid development in the automotive industry including environment, economic and social issues, there has been a significant development of QCD-S (Sustainability) in PDCA (Plan-Do- Check-Action) and Lean Manufacturing (LM). This paper will attempt to investigate the beyond QCD practices in the automotive industry. A linkage of the QCD-S paradigms with included sustainability product development is the new path of the current philosophy.

Keywords

References

  • Allen, C., Sommerville, L., Kennedy, P. & Robertson, H. (2000). Driving for business excellence through environmental performance. Journal of Total Quality Management, 11(4), 602-607.
  • Anbumozhi, V. & Kanda, Y. (2005). Greening the production and supply chains in Asia: Is there a role for voluntary initiatives? Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES). Hyogo: Kansai Research Centre, JAPAN.
  • Axelrod, R. (2000). The financial value of commercial communications. Environmental Quality Management, 9(4), 1-11.
  • Banerjee, S. B. (2001). Corporate citizenship and indigenous stakeholders: Exploring a new dynamic of organisational-stakeholder relationships. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1(1), 39-55.
  • Berry, M. A. & Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Proactive environmental management: A new industrial revolution. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38-50.
  • Crosby, P. B. (1989). Let’s Talk Quality: New York: McGraw Hill.
  • De Ron, A. J. (1998). Sustainable production: The ultimate result of a continuous improvement. International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, 99-110.
  • Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 67-76.
  • Hemming, C., Pugh, S., Williams, G. & Clackburn, D. (2004). Strategies for sustainable development: Use of a benchmarking tools to understand relative strength and weakness and identify best practice. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(2), 103-113.
  • Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success. New York: Random House.
  • Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is Total Quality Control? – The Japanese way. New York, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  • Lagrosen, S. (2000). Born with quality: TQM in a maternity clinic. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13(5), 348-354.
  • Nunes, B. & Bennet, D. (2010). Green operations initiatives in the automotive industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(3), 396-420.
  • Reinhardt, F. L. (2000). Down to Earth. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Van Der Hoek, K. W. (2002). Uitgangspuntenvoor de mest-en ammoniaberekeningen 1997 tot en met 1999 zoalsgebruikt in de Milleubalans 1999 en 2000. The Netherland: RIVM Rapport 773004012, RIVM, Bilthoven.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Hj Ahmad, M. A., & ZienYusoff, R. (2016). Beyond QCD-S Practices in Automotive Industry: A Review of Contemporary QCD-S Paradigms. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 7(2), 6-8. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v7i2.1333

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2016-08-01

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Education and Vocational Research welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission