Author

  • Kelvin Mukolo Kayombo

    • Zambia Centre for Accountancy Studies, Lusaka, Zambia
    • Zambia

  • Steve Carter

    • Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland
    • United Kingdom

Abstract

This study was the second phase of a larger research project that was designed to identify and measure a higher education institution’s brand in Zambia in order to ascertain areas for strengthening the brand’s competitive position. The objectives of this conjoint study were twofold: firstly, to identify the current position of the ZCAS brand as a case study and secondly, to establish the current position of the ZCAS brand relative to its higher education (HE) competitors in Zambia. This quantitative study involved administering a conjoint questionnaire to 110 first year students in ZCAS and 280 first year students in seven universities in the country. The 19 branding elements identified in the initial qualitative stage of the project were aggregated into five principal branding factors using Atlas.ti’s co-occurrence tools to facilitate this conjoint study. These five principal branding attributes are teaching quality, fees, course availability, learning environment and employability. The study revealed that ZCAS has a fairly strong brand position in the Zambian HE sector because the most important elements in its brand model, i.e. course availability, teaching quality and facilities are also the premier brand dimensions in the market. The study also revealed that ZCAS needs to reposition itself away from the competition in order to occupy a more favorable position in the minds of its prospective and existing customers. Accordingly, the study recommends that ZCAS increases its course offerings and collaborates with universities in the region. ZCAS should also consider setting up a quality assurance unit to foster quality in the institution. This study adds to the increasing body of knowledge on HE branding, particularly in developing countries, by developing and then testing a brand orientation model for the Zambian HE market.

Keywords

References

  • 4ICU. (2016). 2016 University Web Rankings | Africa: Top 200 Universities and Colleges in Africa [Online]. Retrieved from: http://www.4icu.org/top-universities-africa/ . Accessed on 25th April 2016.
  • Afful-Broni, A. & Noi-Okwei, C. (2010).Factors Influencing the Choice of Tertiary Education in a Sub-Saharan African University. Academic Leadership , 8(2).
  • Ali-Choudhury, R., Bennet, R. & Savani, S. (2009) University marketing directors ’ views on the components of a university brand. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark, 6 , 11–33.
  • Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods (3rd ed), New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Carter, S. & Yeo, A. (2009). My place or yours? Perceptions of, and selection choice criteria for, higher education institutions: the case of UK and Malaysian students. International Journal of Economics and Business Research , 1(2), 65-190.
  • De Chernatony, L., McDonald, M. & Wallace, E. (2011). Creating Powerful Brands , 4th Edition. Oxford: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
  • Dibb, S., Simkin, L., Pride, W. M. & Ferrell, O. C. (2006). Marketing Concepts and Strategies (5th ed). European Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Fill, C. (2006). Simply Marketing Communications, Essex: FT Prentice Hall.
  • Hagel, P. & Shaw, R. (2008). The Influence of Delivery Mode on Consumer Choice of University. European Advances in Consumer Research, 8(2).
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7thed), New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  • Hooley, G. J. & Lynch, J. E. (1981). Modeling the Student University Choice Process Through the Use of Conjoint Measurement Techniques. European Research , 9(4), 158-170.
  • Huang, H. (2012). An empirical analysis of the strategic management of competitive advantage: a case study of higher technical and vocational education in Taiwan. PhD Thesis, Victoria University.
  • IBM. (2011). IBM SPSS Conjoint 20 [Online] Retrieved from: http://www01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/products/statistics/library.html.Accessed on 27 November 2011.
  • Kayombo, K. M. & Carter, S. (2016). Understanding student preferences for university choice in Zambia. Journal of Education Policy, Planning & Administration, 6(3), 1-21. Retrieved from: http://www.jeppa.org.
  • Kotler, P. & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing Management (14th ed), Essex: Pearson Education.
  • Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (2005). Principles of Marketing (11th ed), New Delhi: Prentice Hall.
  • Krampf, R. F. & Heinlein, A. C. (1981). Developing Marketing Strategies and Tactics in Higher Education Through target Market Research. Decision Sciences, 12(2), 175-193.
  • Kusumawati, A. (2010). Privatization and marketisation of Indonesian public universities: a systematic review of student choice criteria literature. Paper presented at the Indonesian Student International Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Kusumawati, A. (2011). Understanding Student Choice Criteria for Selecting an Indonesian Public University: A Conjoint Analysis Approach. Paper presented at SBS HDR Student Conference, University of Wollongong.
  • Mazzarol, T. & Soutar, G. N. (1999). Sustainable competitive advantage for educational institutions: a suggested model. The International Journal of Educational Management, 13(6), 287-300.
  • Moogan, Y. J., Baron, S. & Bainbridge, S. (2001). Timings and trade-offs in the marketing of higher education courses: a conjoint approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning , 19(3), 179-187.
  • Lynch, R. & Baines, P. (2004) Strategy Development in UK Higher Education: Towards resource-based competitive advantages. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(2).
  • Porter, M. E. (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.
  • Ries, A. & Trout, J. (2001). Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind (20th ed), New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Saunders, N. K. M., Thornhill, A. & Lewis, P. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students (5th ed),London: Apprentice Hall.
  • Songan, P., Sam, H. K., Tonga, G., Rahman, M. A. & Wah, T. K. (2010). Factors Influencing Student Choice: A Study of a Malaysian Public University. Asian Journal of University Education , 6(1), 75-89.
  • Soutar, G. N. & Turner, J. P. (2002). Students' preferences for university: A conjoint analysis. The International Journal of Educational Management , 16(1), 40-45.
  • Times Higher Education. (2016). World University Rankings 2015-2016 [Online].Retrieved from: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2016/worldranking#!/page/0/length/25/country/165/sort_by/rank_label/sort_order/asc/cols/rank_only. Accessed on 25th April 2016.
  • UNESCO-UIS. (2016a). Higher Education [Online].Retrieved from: http://uis.unesco.org/en/topic/highereducation.Accessed on 9 January 2017.
  • UNESCO-UIS. (2016b). Outbound Internationally Mobile Students by Host Region (Online).Retrieved from: http://data.uis.unesco.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=EDULIT_DS&popupcustomise=true&lang= en.Accessed on 9 January 2017.
  • UNESCO-UIS. (2012a). New patterns in student mobility in the Southern African Development Community: UIS Information Bulletin No. 7 [Online]. Retrieved from: http://www.uis.unesco.org/FactSheets/Pages/default.aspx?SPSLanguage=EN.Accessed on 25 April 2016.
  • UNESCO-UIS. (2012b). Table 14: Tertiary Indicators [Online] Retrieved from: http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=167&IF_Language=eng. Accessed on 8th April, 2012.
  • Wiese, M., van Heerden, N., Jordaan, Y. & North, E. (2009). A marketing perspective on choice factors considered by South African first-year students in selecting a higher education institution. Southern African Business Review , 13(1), 39-60.
  • Zambia Institute for Policy Analysis and Research. (2015). ZIPAR launches ground breaking 'More and Better Jobs' flagship project [Online]. Retrieved from: http://zipar.org.zm/8-newsroom/33-zipar-launchesground-breaking-more-and-better-jobs-flagship-project.Accessed on 27 June 2015.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Kayombo, K. M., & Carter, S. (2017). Competitive Positioning of a Higher Education Institution in Zambia: The Case of ZCAS. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 8(2), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v8i2.1858

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Kelvin Mukolo Kayombo, Steve Carter (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2017) Branding, Environment & Learner Performance View issue contents

Published

2017-09-28

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Education and Vocational Research welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission