Author

  • Safana Shaheen

    • Department of Economics, University of Sargodha, Pakistan
    • Pakistan
  • Maqbool Hussain Sial

    • Department of Economics, University of Sargodha, Pakistan
    • Pakistan
  • Masood Sarwar Awan

    • Department of Economics, University of Sargodha, Pakistan
    • Pakistan

Abstract

The present study is an effort to investigate the patterns of female labor force participation in case of Pakistan. In particular, the study analyzed the determinants of female labor force participation decision. The study utilized Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2007-08 data of Punjab. Education is used as a direct human capital variable while; age is a proxy of human capital. The variables used in the analysis are female labour force participation, age, age square, marital status, area, female monthly income, family monthly income, family size, household head education, different classes of female education and employment status. To remove the selectivity bias, the study used Heckman’s (1979) two step procedure. Results of Logit model depicts that household head education, primary, middle, matric & mudrassa education level negatively related with the decision of female labor force participation while, decision towards participation is strong if female belonged to urban area, if she is married, if she has higher education, and if she has large family size. By using ordinary Least Square Method we estimated the earning function. Coefficient of age shows a substantial increase in the wages with each additional year spent. The sign of age square is negative which is according to our expectation and implying the concavity of earning function. Moreover, as the level of education increase the returns to each year of education also increases. In different occupational status females earns more if they are employee, employer or self employed than labourer (a reference category); while female earns less if they belonged to agricultural sector or other sectors than labourer. Married females earn more than others. The respondents’ belonged to urban areas earn more than rural respondents. Moreover, household head education and family size are positively significantly related with female earnings.

Keywords

References

  • Abe, Y. & Oishi, A. S. (2008). A Decomposition Analysis of Earnings Inequality for Wives in Japan Graduate School of Economics & Business Administration Hokkaido University Discussion Paper, Series A, No. 2008-200.
  • Ahmad, E., & Hafeez, A. (2007). Labour Supply and Earning Functions of Educated Married Women: A Case Study of Northern Punjab, The Pakistan Development Review , 46(1), 45–62.
  • Amin, S. (1994). The Poverty-Purdah Trap in Rural Bangladesh. Women. Poverty and Demographic Change, Oaxaca, Mexico, October.
  • Awan, M. S., & Hussain, Z. (2007). Returns to Education and Gender Differentials in Wages in Pakistan. The Lahore Journal of Economics , 12(2), 49-68.
  • Becker, G. S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The Economic Journal , 75(299), 493-517.
  • Blau, F. D. and Kahn, L. M. (2006). Changes in the Labor Supply Behavior of Married Women: 1980-2000. IZA Discussion Papers 2180.
  • Ejaz, M. (2007). Determinants of Female Labor Force Participation in Pakistan: An Empirical Analysis of PSLM (2004-05) Micro Data. The Lahore Journal of Economics Special Edition (September 2007), 203235.
  • Faridi, M. Z., Chaudhry, I. S. & Anwar, M. S. (2009). The socio economic and demographic determinants of women work participation in Pakistan: Evidence from Bahawalpur District. A Research Journal of South Asian Studies , 24(2), 351-367.
  • Faridi, M. Z., Chaudhry, I. S., Malik, M. S. (2011). Why Women are Self-Employed? Empirical Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Finance , 3(1), 198-207.
  • García-Escribano, M. (2004). Does Spousal Labor Smooth Fluctuations in Husbands’ Earnings? The Role of Liquidity Constraints IMF Working Paper WP/04/20.
  • Georgellis, Y. and Wall, H. J. (2005). Gender differences in self‐employment. International Review of Applied Economics, 19(3), 321-342.
  • Heckman, J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as Specification Error. Econometrica , 47(1), 153–61.
  • Kazi, S. & Raza, B. (1986). Household Headed by Women: Income Employment and Household Organisation. The Pakistan Development Review, 27(4), 781–790.
  • Le Anh, T. (2000). The determinants of Immigrant Self-employment in Australia. International Migration Review , 34(1), 183-214.
  • Maglad, N. A. (1998). Female labor supply in Sudan. AERC Special Paper 30 African Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi
  • Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, Experience and Earnings: New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Mincer, J. (1980). Labour Force Participation of Married Women. In Aliech Amsdon (ed.) Economics of Women and Work. Colombia: Penguim Books.
  • Mincer, J. & Polachek, S. (1974). Family Investment in Human Capital. Earnings of Women. The Journal of Political Economy , 82(2), 76-108.
  • Naqvi, Z. F. & Shahnaz, L. (2004). How do women decide to work in Pakistan? Pakistan Development Review , 41(2), 495-511.
  • Raaum, O., Eriksson, T., Bratsberg, T., Jäntti, M., Røed, K., Naylor, R. & Österbacka, E. (2007). Marital Sorting, Household Labor Supply, and Intergenerational Earnings Mobility across Countries Discussion Paper No. IZA DP No. 3037.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Shaheen, S., Sial, M. H., & Awan, M. S. (2011). Female Labor Force Participation in Pakistan: A Case of Punjab. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 2(3), 104-110. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v2i3.659

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2011-09-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Social and Development Sciences welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission