Author

  • Henry de-Graft Acquah

    • University of Cape Coast, Ghana
    • Ghana

Abstract

The power of the conventional Houck’s model of asymmetry is examined via parametric bootstrap simulation. The results of the bootstrap simulations indicate that the Houck’s model has low power in rejecting the null of symmetric adjustment. The power of the test depends on the bootstrap sample size, level of asymmetry and the amount of noise in the data generating process used in an application. With a small bootstrap sample and large noise level, the Houck’s model display low power in rejecting the null hypothesis of symmetry.

Keywords

References

  • Acquah, H. D. (2012). A Bootstrap Approach to Testing for Symmetry in the Granger and Lee Asymmetric Error Correction Model. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 11(11), 33-36.
  • Acquah, H. D. (2010). Testing for Symmetry in the Houck’s Model in Indian Development Review. An International Journal of Development Economics , 8(1), 105-107.
  • Appel, V. (1992). Asymmetrie in der Preistransmission. Agrarwirtschaft Sonderheft , 135, 178-213.
  • Boyd, M. S. & Brorsen, B. W. (1998). Price Asymmetry in the US Pork Marketing Channel, North Central. Journal of Agricultural Economics , 10, 103- 109.
  • Capps, O. & Sherwell, P. (2007). Alternative approaches in detecting asymmetry in farm-retail prices transmission of fluid milk. Journal of Agribusiness , 23(3), 313-331.
  • Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap, London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Hahn, W. F. (1990). Price Transmission Asymmetry in Pork and Beef Markets. The Journal of Agricultural Economics Research , 42(4), 21-30.
  • Hansmire, M. R. & Schertz-Willet, L. (1992). Price Transmission Processes: A Study of Price Lags and asymmetric Price Response Behaviour for New York Red Delicious and McIntosh Apples, Cornell University.
  • Houck, J. P. (1977). An Approach to Specifying and Estimating Nonreversible Functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 59, 570-572
  • Kinnucan, H. W. & Forker, O. D. (1987). Asymmetry in Farm-Retail Price Transmission for major Dairy Products. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 69, 285-292.
  • Mohanty, S., Peterson, E. W. F. & Kruse, N. C. (1995). Price Asymmetry in the International Wheat Market. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 43, 355-366.
  • Norouzi, G. & Moghaddasi, R. (2012). Analysis of Price Transmission along the Iranian Market Chain for Different Meat Products. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2(1), 64-69.
  • Pick, D. H., Karrenbrock, J. D. & Carman, H. F. (1990). Price Asymmetry and Marketing Margin Behavior: an Example for California - Arizona Citrus. Journal of Agribusiness , 6(1), 75-84.
  • Tweenten, L. G. & Quance, C. L. (1969). Positivistic Measures of aggregate Supply Elasticities: Some new Approaches. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 51, 342-352.
  • Ward, R. W. (1982). Asymmetry in Retail, Wholesale and Shipping Point Pricing for fresh Vegetables. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 62, 205-212.
  • Wolffram, R. (1971). Positivistic Measures of Aggregate Supply Elasticities—Some New Approaches –Some Critical Notes. American journal of Agricultural Economics , 53, 356-356.
  • Zhang, P., Fletcher, S. & Carley, D. (1995). Peanut Price Transmission Asymmetry in Peanut Butter. Journal of Agribusiness , 11(1), 13-20.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

de-Graft Acquah, H. (2013). A Bootstrap Approach to Evaluating the Power of the Houck’s Test for Asymmetry. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 4(2), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v4i2.737

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2013-02-28

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Social and Development Sciences welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission