Abstract
Rural population is often considered as a homogeneous population. The wide diversity among rural population is often ignored when health related issues are considered. The study emphasizes that heterogeneous composition of rural population leads to improper implementation of rural health facilities, which in turn leads to poor health conditions. It is argued that wide divergences in rural sector should be understood to roll out any such policy for the rural sector in particular. This paper attempts to show how heterogeneity in rural population affects the health status. The burden of disease and its effects are disproportionately seen in the poor, with a clear gradient in illness and morbidity. The most affected are the poor and vulnerable section of the population. The privileged section in rural society is termed as ‘Rural elite’. Attempts have been made to define rural elites in terms of ownership of better facilities and endowments (like land). It is argued that the elites enjoy health facilities and have better health conditions. On the contrary, health status of rural poor is abysmal. The objective of the study is to explore the disparities between these two groups and examine how these disparities affect health conditions. The study reveals that the incidence of selective diseases is much lower in the case of rural elites. Despite progress in improving access to health care, inequalities by socioeconomic status continue to persist.
Keywords
- Rural Elite Search this journal for Rural Elite (opens in a new tab)
- Rural Poor Search this journal for Rural Poor (opens in a new tab)
- Incidence of Disease Search this journal for Incidence of Disease (opens in a new tab)
- Land Ownership Search this journal for Land Ownership (opens in a new tab)
- Regional Inequality Search this journal for Regional Inequality (opens in a new tab)
References
- Deodhar, N. S. (2001). Health Situation in India (1st ed), New Delhi: Voluntary Health Association of India.
- Dholakia, R. H. (2003). Regional Disparity in Economic and Human Development in India. Economic and Political Weekly , 38(39), 4166-4172.
- Hartley, D. (2004). Rural Health Disparities, Population Health and Rural Culture. Am J Public Health , 94, 1675–1678.
- Health, United States. (2001). Urban and Rural Chartbook. Department of Health and Human Services.
- International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. Third National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India, Volumes I and II, (Mumbai: IIPS). 2007.
- Johnson, S. (2001). Focusing on differences: a new approach for rural policy? Center for the study of rural America.
- Kurian, N. J. (2000). Widening Regional Disparities in India: Some Indicators. Economic and Political Weekly , 35(7), 538-550.
- Office of the Registrar General of India Ministry of Home Affairs. Census of India. New Delhi, India; 2011.
- Patil, A. V., Somasundaran, K. V. & Goyal, R. C. (2002). Current Health Scenario in Rural India. Aust. J. Rural Health , 10, 129-135.
- Planning Commission of India. (2011). High Level Expert Group Report on Universal Health Coverage for India.
- Pradhan, B. K., Roy, P. K., Saluja, M. R. & Venkatram, S. (2000). Rural-Urban Disparities: Income Distribution, Expenditure Pattern and Social Sector. Economic and Political Weekly , 35(28/29), 2527-2529+25312539.
- Rao, V. M. (1983). Barriers in Rural Development. Economic and Political Weekly , 18(27), 1177-1179, 11821185,1187-1190.
- Rosenzweig, M. R. & Robert, E. (1977). Fertility, schooling, and the economic contribution of children in rural India: An econometric analysis. Econometrica , 4(1),065-1,079.
- Schutjer, W. A., Stokes, C. S. & Poindexter, J. R. (1983). Farm Size, Land Ownership, and Fertility in Rural Egypt. Land Economics , 59(4), 393-403.
- Wamani, H., Tylleskar, T., Astrom, A. N., Tumwine, J. K. & Peterson, S. (2004). Mothers' education but not fathers' education, household assets or land ownership is the best predictor of child health inequalities in rural Uganda. International Journal for Equity in Health, doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-3-9.
Downloads
No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.
How to Cite
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Moumita Poddar, Sandip Mitra (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
Keywords
- Rural Elite Search this journal for Rural Elite (opens in a new tab)
- Rural Poor Search this journal for Rural Poor (opens in a new tab)
- Incidence of Disease Search this journal for Incidence of Disease (opens in a new tab)
- Land Ownership Search this journal for Land Ownership (opens in a new tab)
- Regional Inequality Search this journal for Regional Inequality (opens in a new tab)
Section
Published
Submissions
Have research to publish? Journal of Social and Development Sciences welcomes submissions.
Make a Submission