Author

  • Llewellyn Leonard

    • University of Johannesburg, South Africa
    • South Africa

Abstract

The World Social Forum (WSF) has provided an international stage for civil society from across the globe to share ideas, strategies, tactics and struggles for creating ‘another world’ against the failures of market inequalities. It attracts more than sixty thousand people pursuing the vision of 'Another World is Possible', with the event becoming a symbol of hope for environmental, social and economic justice. How effective has the WSF been in projecting the concerns of the grassroots against inequalities produced? Should new strategies and tactics be forged amongst civil society so that this international platform becomes more meaningful for the marginalised? Through empirical work conducted at the 2011 WSF in Dakar, Senegal, supplemented with previous empirical work with civil society conducted in Durban, South Africa, this paper points to challenges that need to be addressed by civil society if ‘another world is possible.’ Although there is an urgent need for local representative and civil society to mobilise social capital and include the grassroots into discussions in future WSF gatherings, the success of such an international platform is also influenced by historical, socio-economic and political contexts within countries influencing social capital within networks. Grassroots empowerment will help build more coherent actions that reflect the needs of those most affected by inequalities

Keywords

References

  • Ballard, R., Habib, A., Valodia, I. & Zuern, E. (2005). Globalization, Marginalization, and Contemporary Social Movements in South Africa . Journal of African Affairs , 104(417), 615–634.
  • Barnett, C. & Scott, D. (2007). Space of opposition: activism and deliberation in post-apartheid environmental politics. Environment and Planning A , 39(11), 2612–2631.
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a new modernity, London, California and New Delhi, SAGE Publications.
  • Beck, U. (1999). World Risk Society, United States, Blackwell Publishers Inc.
  • Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology , 51(1), 5-24.
  • Chossudovsky, M. (2013). The Anti-Globalization Movement and the World Social Forum. Is Another World Possible? Centre for Research on Globalisation, 15 May. Available from: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-anti-globalization-movement-and-the-world-social-forumanother-world-is-possible/5335181
  • Cock, J. (2004). Connecting the red, brown and green: The environmental justice movement in South Africa. In: Ballard, R, Habib, A and Valodia, I ( eds ) (2006) Voices of Protest: Social Movements in Post-Apartheid South Africa . Pietermaritzburg: UKZN Press.
  • Conway, J. (2011). Cosmopolitan or Colonial? The World Social Forum as ‘contact zone. Third World Quarterly , 32(2), 217-236.
  • Fig, D. (2005). Manufacturing amnesia. International Affairs, 81(3), 599-617.
  • Fine, B. (2003). Social capital for Africa, Transformations , 53, 29-52.
  • Hallowes, D. & Butler, M. (2004). The balance of Rights: ground Work Report 2004. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
  • Hallowes, D. & Butler, M. (2005). Whose energy future? Big oil against people in Africa, groundwork Report 2005, South Africa, Arrow Print.
  • Hyatt, J. (2013). Time to Decolonise the World Social Forum, Inter-Press Service News Agency, May 19. Online: http://www.ipsnews.net/2013/04/time-to-decolonise-the-world-social-forum/
  • Lazzarato, M. (2009). Neoliberalism in Action: Inequality, Insecurity and the Reconstitution of the Social. Theory, Culture & Society , 26, 109-133
  • Lee, J., Arnason, A., Nightingale, A. & Shucksmith, M. (2005). Networking: Social Capital and Identities in European Rural Development, European Society for Rural Studies , 45(4).
  • Leonard, L. & Pelling, M. (2010). Mobilisation and protest: environmental justice in Durban, South Africa. Local Environment , 15, 137-151
  • Mohan, G. & Mohan, J, (2002). Placing social capital. Progress in Human Geography , 26, 191–210.
  • Pick, D. & Dayaram, K. (2006). Globalisation, reflexive modernisation, and development: the case of India. Society and Business Review, 1(2), 171-183.
  • Portes, A. (1998). Social Capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology , 24, 1-24.
  • Power, A. & Willmot, H. (2007). Social capital within the neighbourhood, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, Case Report 38, Prepared by the LSE, June.
  • Radcliffe, A. S. (2004). Geography of development: development, civil society and inequality – social capital is (almost) dead? Progress in Human Geography , 28(4), 517-527.
  • Scott, D. (2003). Creative destruction: Early modernist planning in the South Durban industrial zone, South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 29(1), 235–259.
  • Smith, C. (2012). Neoliberalism and Inequality: A Recipe for Interpersonal Violence? Sociology Lens. Available from: http://thesocietypages.org/sociologylens/2012/11/06/neoliberalism-andinequality-a-recipe-for-interpersonal-violence/
  • Sparks, S. (2006). A long history: Civil Society, pollution and the Wentworth Oil Refinery. Centre for Civil Society Research Report , 1(45), 167-193.
  • Stolle, D. & Hooghe, M. (2003). Conflicting Approaches to the Study of Social Capital: Competing Explanations for Cause and Effect of Social Capital, Environmental Perspective , 10(1), 22-45.
  • Trigilia, C. (2001). Social capital and local development, European Journal of Social Theory , 4(4).
  • Taylor, R. & Naidoo, K. (2004). Taking Global Civil Society Seriously. In: Taylor, R. Ed, Creating a Better World: Interpreting Global Civil Society. United States: Kumarian Press.
  • United Nations South African Human Development Report. (2003). The Challenge of Sustainable Development in South Africa: Unlocking People’s Creativity, Published for the United Nations Development Programme, Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
  • Wakefield, S., Elliott, S., Eyeles, J. & Cole, D. (2005). Taking environmental action: the role of local composition, context, and collective. Environmental Management , 37(1), 40-53.
  • Wilson, A. (2007). Feminism in the Space of the World Social Forum. Journal of International Women's Studies , 8(3), 10-27.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Leonard, L. (2014). The World Social Forum as a sub-political space for environmental justice: The case for South African grassroots empowerment within a network society. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 5(4), 238-244. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v5i4.823

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2014-12-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Social and Development Sciences welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission