Author

  • John Walsh

    • Shinwatra University Thailand
    • Thailand

Abstract

Agricultural households tend, around the world, to have gendered divisions of work depending on a range of historical, practical, cultural and geographic factors. Once the issue of who does what in the household is determined, it tends to remain that way and this means it is difficult to introduce development-positive changes in the household in the absence of a moment of change. This paper investigates whether there are opportunities for such change in the case of livestock management in Cambodia. A total of 200 interviews were conducted in four rural areas of Cambodia using a specially designed questionnaire. The extent and spread of livestock ownership was investigated together with the issue of who in the household takes responsibility for different aspects of that management. It is found that there is some limited scope for introducing change in households through changing the opportunities for livestock agriculture in Cambodia.

Keywords

References

  • Acharya, M. & Bennett, L. (1983). Women and the Subsistence Sector: Economic Participation and Household Decision Making in Nepal. World Bank Staff Working Papers, 526.
  • Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2014). Asian Development Outlook 2014: Fiscal Policy for Inclusive Growth. Manila: ADB.
  • Baumeister, R. F. (2002).Yielding to Temptation: Self-Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research , 28(4),670-6.
  • Belk, R. W. (1975). Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research , 2(3), 157-64.
  • Blunt, P. & Turner, M. (2005). Decentralization, Democracy and Development in a Post-Conflict Society: Commune Councils in Cambodia. Public Administration and Development , 25(1),75-87.
  • Budlender, D. (2003). The Debate about Household Headship, Social Dynamics. A Journal of African Studies , 29(2),48-72.
  • Chan, R. & Chheang, V. (2008).Cultural Challenges to the Decentralization Process in Cambodia. The Ritsumeikan Journal of Asia Pacific Studies , 24,1-16.
  • Daguan, Z. (2007). A Record of Cambodia: The Land and Its People, translated with an introduction by Peter Harris. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
  • Davidson, P. (1982). Rational Expectations: A Fallacious Foundation for Studying Crucial Decision-Making Processes. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics , 5(2),182-98.
  • Davis, H. L. (1976). Decision Making within the Household. Journal of Consumer Research , 2(4),241-60.
  • De Jong, G. F. (2000). Expectations, Gender, and Norms in Migration Decision-Making. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography , 54(3),307-19.
  • Donovan, R. J., Rossiter, J. R., Marcoolyn, G. & Nesdale, A. (1994). State Atmosphere and Purchasing Behavior. Journal of Retailing , 70(3),283-94.
  • Edwards, W. (1954).The Theory of Decision Making. Psychological Bulletin , 51(4),380-417.
  • Hoggart, R. (1996). The Way We Live Now: Dilemmas in Contemporary Culture, new ed. London: Pimlico.
  • Jacobsen, T. (2008). Lost Goddesses: The Denial of Female Power in Cambodian History. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
  • Karl, M. (1995).Women and Empowerment: Participation and Decision-Making. London: UN NGLS/Zed Books.
  • Klein, G. & Zsambok, C. C. (1997). Naturalistic Decision Making. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, Lawrence, Associates. Kriti, T. W., Tisdell, C. & Roy, K. C. (2003). Female Participation in Decision Making in Agricultural Households in Kenya: Empirical Findings. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology , 2(2),103-24.
  • Lovichakorntikul, P., Ngamsang, S. & Walsh, J. (2013).The Impact of Agricultural Input Change on Gendered Decision-Making in Rice-Farming Households in Thailand and Cambodia. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on International Relations and Development, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
  • Manser, M. & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis. International Economic Review , 21(1),31-44.
  • Reynolds, T. J. & Gutman, J. (1988).Laddering Theory, Method, Analysis, and Interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research , 28(1),11-31.
  • Rocheleau, D. E. (1991). Gender, Ecology, and the Science of Survival: Stories and Lessons from Kenya. Agriculture and Human Values , 8(1-2), 156-65.
  • Scott, J. C. (1976). The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in South East Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 69, 99-118.
  • Thakur, R. & Walsh, J. (2013). Space and Workplace Issues for Nepalese Female Entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the International Conference on Economics and Social Sciences, First Hotel, Bangkok.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G. & Ackerman, P. L. (2000). A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 83(1),33-60.
  • World Bank. (2012). World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development, Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Yisehak, K. (2008). Gender Responsibility in Smallholder Mixed Crop-Livestock Production Systems of Jimma Zone, South West Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development , 20(1),available at: http://www.lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd20/1/yise20011.htm.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Walsh, J. (2015). Livestock Management and Gendered Decision-Making in Rural Cambodia. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 6(4), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v6i4.862

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2015-12-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Social and Development Sciences welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission