Author

  • Muhammad Usman Tariq

    • Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (SZABIST), Islamabad, Pakistan
    • Pakistan
  • M. Naeem Ahmed Khan

    • Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (SZABIST), Islamabad, Pakistan
    • Pakistan

Abstract

Six Sigma, with a myriad of its applications in numerous organizational and business processes, offers a project management methodology that supports achieving a goal of near perfection in process performance. Six Sigma is based on the impetus of Plan-Do-Check-Act can help industries, businesses and organizations to achieve significant performance improvement as most of the Fortune 500 companies have adopted Six Sigma (DeFeo & William, 2004). Six Sigma initiatives primarily entail DMAIC and DMADV methods for attaining a high standard of quality. In this paper we provide a critical analysis of the various Six Sigma applications, techniques and tools that can be used for improving quality and productivity of the organizations. The study also provides an insight into the methods used for risk identification in Six Sigma. The proposed techniques are evaluated and analyzed viz-a-viz DMAIC and DMADV approaches. The objective of this research is to summarize the existing level of research in the field of Six Sigma and highlighting the need for intensive academic research in this area. The study comparatively analyzes Six Sigma with Lean, QFD, PSP/TSP, FMEA, TPRM, AHP/ISS and PMBOK requirements. The study also highlights the prospective areas of future/further research in this discipline. The critical analysis of various techniques studied as part of this research reveals that Six Sigma is primarily beneficial for process improvement, risk identification and management etc. The critical analysis of this study is reported herein.

Keywords

References

  • Alhawari S., Thabtah F., Karadsheh L,. & Hadi, W. M. (2008). A risk management model for project execution . Paper presented at the 9th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), Marrakech, Morocco.
  • Azizi, N., & Hashim, K. (2008). Enterprise level it risk management . Paper presented at the 8th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer Science, Venice, Italy.
  • Benedikt, M., & Frank, T. (2009). Why risk management matters in it outsourcing – a systematic literature review and elements of a research agenda . Paper presented at the 17th European Conference on Information Systems, Verona, Italy.
  • Deng, X., & Ma, Z. (2008). Research on risk management of large-scale software project based on consumer’s demand . Paper presented at the 38th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, Beijing, China.
  • De Feo, J. A., & William W .B,. (2004). Juran Institute's Six Sigma Breakthrough and Beyond: Quality Performance Breakthrough Methods . New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.
  • Hsieh, C. T., Manduca, B., & Lin, B. (2007). Information technology and Six Sigma Implementation. Journal of Computer Information Systems Summer , 47(4), 1-10.
  • Park, Y., Choi, H., & Baik, J. (2007). A framework for the use of Six Sigma tools in PSP/TSP . Paper presented at the 5th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management & Applications, Busan, South Korea.
  • Racz, N., Weippl, E., & Seufert, A. (2010). A process model for integrated IT governance, risk, and compliance management . Paper presented at the 9th International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems, Riga, Latvia.
  • Rath, M., & Sponholz, R. (2009). IT-Compliance: Erfolgreiches Management regulatorischer Anforderungen . London: Schmidt Erich Verlag.
  • Rovai, R. L., Rodrigues, L. C., & Campanario, M. A. (2006). Strategic model for risk evaluation in project management . Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Management of Technology, International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT), Beijing, China.
  • Santos, D. & Cabral, S. (2008). FMEA and PMBOK applied to project risk management. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management , 5(2), 347-364.
  • Seyedhoseini, S.M. & Hatefi, M.A. (2009). Two-pillar risk management (TPRM): a generic project risk management process. Transaction on Industrial Engineering, 16(2), 138-148.
  • Soderholm, A. (2008). Project management of unexpected events. International Journal of Project Management , 26, 80–86.
  • Staveren, M. T. (2007). Extending to geotechnical risk management . Paper presented at the 1st International Symposium on Geotechnical Safety and Risk, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang, H. (2008). A review of six sigma approach: methodology, implementation and future research . Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM), Dalian, China.
  • Wang, J., Lin, W., & Huang, Y., (2010). A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R&D projects. Technovation , 30(11-12), 601-611.
  • Zhang, W., Hill, A. V., & Gilbreath, G. H. (2009). Six Sigma: a retrospective and prospective study. Paper presented at the POMS 20th Annual Conference, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Tariq, M. U., & Khan, M. N. A. (2011). An Insight into Risk Identification, Quality and Productivity Enhancement using Six Sigma. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 2(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v2i1.21

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2011-07-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Education and Vocational Research welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission