Author

  • Nadia Rifaat

    • University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
    • United Arab Emirates

  • Oualid Ben Ali

    • University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
    • United Arab Emirates

  • Waleed M. Al Sabhan

    • University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
    • United Arab Emirates

  • Mohammed Nour

    • University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
    • United Arab Emirates

Abstract

Accrediting organizations now mandate the development of learning outcomes (LO) and the methods to assess those learning outcomes for national and international institutions of higher learning. Because of this, academic institutions pay greater attention to the development and assessment of these LO. There are two types of learning outcomes: course outcomes and program outcomes. This paper presents an empirical study that examines both kinds of LO in a case study of one course (title: Database Fundamental and Applications, number: 0303331) within the Management Information System (MIS) department at the University of Sharjah (UoS), United Arab Emirates and presents the following with regard to this case study: 1) the development process of the LO for this specific course; 2) the data collection process, and 3) the data collected related to the assessment instruments for both the course and program LO ( course learning instructions, course exams, course projects, students’ records, students’ grades, course reports, course evaluation, instructor evaluation, exit surveys, employer surveys, and job placement indicators ); 4) the methods of assessment of the LO based on the analysis of the collected data using a variety of analysis technique and tools; and 5) the usage of the analysis results in successive semesters in order to improve the MIS courses and program. The findings of this empirical study suggest several areas for improvement. One improvement is the addition of more practice-based learning components. Additionally, the study shows that the enhancement of the course material, the improvement of teaching strategies, and the usage of technology and its infusion into the learning process are areas that can improve LO. Overall, the method of LO development and assessment described in this empirical examination has shown a positive effect on the courses and program in the MIS department, and it is believed that the results can be generalized for use by others in developing and assessing LO in other learning institutions.

Keywords

References

  • AAHE, A. A. f. H. E. (2009). Nine principles of good practice for assessing student learning.
  • Acharya, C. (2003). Outcome-based Education (OBE): A new Paradigm for learning. CDTLink. National University of Singapore. Singapore.
  • Allen, M. (2006). Assessing general education programs. (1-10).Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company.
  • Angelo, T. A. (2002). Engaging and supporting faculty in the scholarship of assessment: Guidelines. In T. W. Banta (Ed.), Building a scholarship of assessment (185–200). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Astin, A. W. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York, NY: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
  • Banta, T. W. (2002). Building a scholarship of assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Banta, T. W. (2008). Profiles of good practice in assessment. Assessment Update, 20 (6), 3–4.
  • Barkley, E. F. (2009). Student Engagement Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. Wiley Publishers.
  • Barkley, E. (2010). Student engagement techniques: a handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
  • Besterfield-sacre, M. E., Larry J. S., Harvey, W., Cynthia, J., Atman, J. M., Ronald, L., Miller, B. M. O. & Gloria, M. R. (2000). Defining the Outcomes: A framework for EC 2000. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Education, 43(2), 100-110.
  • David, J. P. (2009). Giving a voice to teachers and students in an outcome-based approach. ELT Journal , 63(4), 387-389.
  • Doherty, K. P. (2005). Beyond the accountability–improvement debate: A case study analysis of institutional response to assessment.
  • Ewell, P. T. (2002). Perpetual movement: Assessment after twenty years. Paper presented at the 2002 Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Ewell, P. T. (2008). Assessment and accountability in America today: Background and context. Paper presented at the 2008 Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Ewell, P. T. (2009). Assessment, Accountability, and Improvement: Re-visiting the Tension (NILOA Occasional Paper No.1). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute of Learning Outcomes Assessment. November 2009.
  • Felder, R. & Brent, R. (2003). Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria. Journal of Engineering Education , 92(1), 7-18.
  • Hashim, R. & Mohd-Din, M. A. (2009). Implementing Outcomes Based Education using project based learning at University of Malaya. European Journal of Scientific Research , 26(1), 80-86.
  • Houshangi, N. (2003). Curriculum Assessment and Enhancement at Perdue University Calumet Based On ABET 2000. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 120-128.
  • Huba, M. E., Schuh, J. & Shelley, M. (2006). Recasting doctoral education in an outcomes framework. In P. L. Maki & N. A. Borkowski (Eds.), the assessment of doctoral education (239–272). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Kember, D., Ho, S.S.S., Lau, C. B., Au-Yeung, M. M., Chow, M. S. & Leung D. Y. (2009). An outcomes-based approach to curriculum development in pharmacy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education , 73(1).
  • Kuh, G. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved March 5, 2012 from http://www.neasc.org/downloads/aacu_high_impact_2008_final.pdf.
  • Lau G. K. (2009). The changing faces of outcomes-based learning: Teaching and learning creativity 10.20.30. The International Journal of Learning, 16(5), 125-138.
  • Lenning, O. T., Lee, Y. S., Micek, S. S. & Service, A. L. (1977). A structure for the outcomes of postsecondary education. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. Retrieved March 5, 2012 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED150904.pdf.
  • Maki, P. L. (2002). Developing an assessment plan to learn about student learning. The Journal of Academic Librarianship , 28, 8-13.
  • Moore, W. S. (1994). Student and faculty epistemology in the college classroom: The Perry schema of intellectual and ethical development. In K. W. Prichard & R. M. Sawyer (Eds.), Handbook of college teaching: Theory and applications (45–67). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Oster, S. (2003). Writing measurable Learning Outcomes. Texas A&M 3rd Annual Assessment Conference. Pang, M., Ho, T. M. & Ryan, M. (2009). Learning approaches and outcome-based teaching and learning: A case study in Hong Kong, China. Journal of Teaching in International Business , 1528-699 20(2), 106-122.
  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. In Rapaport, William J. William Perry's Scheme of Intellectual and Ethical Development,
  • Shavelson, R. (2007). Assessing student learning responsibly: from history to an audacious proposal. Change, January/February 2007, 26-33.
  • Shavelson, R. J. & Huang, L. (2003). Responding responsibly to the frenzy to assess learning in higher education. Change, 35 (1), 11–19.
  • Spady, W. & Marshall, K. (1994). Light, not Heat, on OBE. The American School Board Journal , 181, 29-33.
  • Terenzini, P. (1997). Student outcomes information for policy-making (NCES 97-991). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Thurmond, V. A. & Popkess-Vawter, D. (2003). Examination of a middle range theory: Applying Astin’s input–environment–outcomes (I–E–O) model to web-based education . Journal of Nursing Informatics , 7(2).
  • Timm, M. D. (2009). Developing outcomes-based assessment for learner-centered education: A faculty introduction. Journal of College Student Development , 49(4), 392-394.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Rifaat, N., Ben Ali, O., Al Sabhan, W. M., & Nour, M. (2012). Effective Learning Outcomes Assessment: The Case of the MIS Department at the UoS. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 3(2), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v3i2.50

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2012 Nadia Rifaat, Oualid Ben Ali, Waleed M. Al Sabhan, Mohammed Nour (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2012) Leadership, Mindfulness & Learning Outcomes View issue contents

Published

2012-02-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Education and Vocational Research welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission