Author

  • Alsaleh Saad

    • Ministry of Health Hail, Saudi Arabia
    • Saudi Arabia
  • Haryani Haron

    • University Technology Mara (UiTM), Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

This qualitative case study aims to explore and describe the academicians’ knowledge sharing motivations in a Malaysian public university. A single case study was conducted with the aim to gather deeper insights on the knowledge sharing motivation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. A total of 15 renowned academicians were interviewed. Content analysis method was used to extract the knowledge sharing motivations from the qualitative data. The research results reveal seven important factors which motivate academicians to share their knowledge. These motivations are build reputation, acknowledgement (includes gain rewards, get a promotion, and recognition), to be knowledgeable, reciprocity, vision and mission, mentoring, personal beliefs (includes culture, sense of responsibility, and religion). The research comprehensive analysis and results would expand an area of knowledge sharing motivations among academicians in universities which may still theoretically and empirically not adequately explored and described.

Keywords

References

  • Abdullah, N. L., Hamzah, N., Arshad, R., Isa, R. M. & Ghani, R. A. (2011). Psychological contract and knowledge sharing among academicians: mediating role of relational social capital. International Business Research , 4(4), 231.
  • Abdullah, R., Selamat, M. H., Jaafar, A., Abdullah, S. & Sura, S. (2008). An Empirical Study of Knowledge Management System Implementation in Public Higher Learning Institution.
  • Abedini, A. (2012). An analysis of factors affecting staffs knowledge sharing in the central library of the University of Isfahan using the extension of Theory of Reasoned Action. International Journal of Human Resource Studies , 2(1), 158.
  • Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS quarterly , 2, 107-136.
  • Antonova, A., Csepregi, A. & Marchev-Jr, A. (2011). How to extend the ICT used at organizations for transferring and sharing knowledge. Available at SSRN 1776642.
  • Bock, G. W. & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ) , 15(2), 14-21.
  • Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G. & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS quarterly , 2, 87-111.
  • Bonifacio, M., Bouquet, P. & Cuel, R. (2002). The role of classification (s) in distributed knowledge management. In Proc. of KES (2).
  • Cheng, M. Y., Ho, J. S. Y. & Lau, P. M. (2009). Knowledge sharing in academic institutions: a study of Multimedia University Malaysia. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management , 7(3), 313-324.
  • Chennamaneni, A. (2007). Determinants of knowledge sharing behaviors: developing and testing an integrated theoretical model.
  • Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H. & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision support systems , 42(3), 18721888.
  • Connelly, C. E. & Kelloway, E. K. (2003). Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures.
  • Constant, D., Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization science , 7(2), 119-135. Leadership & Organization Development Journal , 24(5), 294-301.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
  • Drula, G. (2009). Sharing Knowledge Inside Social Network Sites. ET Scientia International Journal (LESIJ) , (16-2), 463-473.
  • Emelo, R. (2012). Why personal reputation matters in virtual knowledge sharing. Industrial and Commercial Training , 44(1), 35-40.
  • Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F. & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry , 36(6), 717-732.
  • Fullwood, R., Rowley, J. & Delbridge, R. (2013). Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities. Journal of Knowledge Management , 17(1), 123-136.‏
  • Gorry, G. A. (2008). Sharing knowledge in the public sector: two case studies. Knowledge Management Research & Practice , 6(2), 105-111.
  • Haldin-Herrgard, T. (2000). Difficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organizations. Journal of Intellectual capital , 1(4), 357-365.
  • Jain, K. K., Sandhu, M. S. & Sidhu, G. K. (2007). Knowledge sharing among academic staff: A case study of business schools in Klang Valley, Malaysia. JASA , 2, 23-9.
  • Jennings, B. J. (2011). Factors that contribute to knowledge sharing within research based organizations. (Order No. 3473197, The University of New Mexico). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , 219.
  • Johnson, R. B. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education , 118(2), 282292.
  • Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. Mis Quarterly , 3, 113-143.
  • Lakhani, K. R. & Eric, V. H. (2003). How open source software works:“free” user-to-user assistance. Research policy , 32(6), 923-943.
  • Luo, H. (2009). Determinants of knowledge sharing in university academic team. In Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling. KAM'09. Second International Symposium on IEEE , 1, 260-263.
  • Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family practice , 13(6), 522-526.
  • Martin, J. S. & Marion, R. (2005). Higher education leadership roles in knowledge processing. Learning Organization , 12(2), 140-151.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard educational review , 62(3), 279-301. ISO 690.
  • Muller, R. M., Spiliopoulou, M. & Lenz, H. J. (2005). The influence of incentives and culture on knowledge sharing. In System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 247b-247b). IEEE.
  • Nonaka, I. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford university press.
  • Peariasamy, T., Mansor, A. & Naha, N. (2008). On-the job knowledge sharing: how to train employees to share job knowledge. Jurnal Kemanusiaan , 12, 87-101.
  • Ryan, F., Coughlan, M. & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing , 16(12), 738-744.
  • Seonghee, K. & Boryung, J. (2008). An analysis of faculty perceptions: Attitudes toward knowledge sharing and collaboration in an academic institution. Library & Information Science Research , 30(4), 282290
  • Sharratt, M. & Usoro, A. (2003). Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management , 1(2), 187-196.
  • Sun, S. Y., Ju, T. L., Chumg, H. F., Wu, C. Y. & Chao, P. J. (2009). Influence on Willingness of Virtual Community’s Knowledge Sharing: Based on Social Capital Theory and Habitual Domain. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology , 53, 142-149.
  • Supar, N. (2006). Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Among Academic Staff in Selected Malaysian Higher Educational Institutions and the Effect on Performance. (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Putra Malaysia) Retrived from psasir. 5583
  • Sveiby, E. & Simons, R. (2002). Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work–an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management , 6(5), 420-433.
  • Syed-Ikhsan, S. O. S. & Rowland, F. (2004). Benchmarking knowledge management in a public organisation in Malaysia. Benchmarking: An International Journal , 11(3), 238-266.
  • Trehan, A. & Kushwaha, P. (2012). The implementation of Knowledge Management System in B-Schools. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies , 2(2).
  • Wasko, M. M. & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly , 3, 35-57.
  • Yang, J. T. (2007). The impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management , 11(2), 83-90.
  • Yue Wah, C., Menkhoff, T., Loh, B. & Evers, H. D. (2007). Social capital and knowledge sharing in knowledge-based organizations: An empirical study. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM) , 3(1), 29-48.
  • Zawawi, A. A., Zakaria, Z., Kamarunzaman, N. Z., Noordin, N., Sawal, M. Z. H. M., Junos, N. M. & Najid, N. S. A. N. (2011). The Study of Barrier Factors in Knowledge Sharing: A Case Study in Public University. Management Science and Engineering , 5(1), 59-70.
  • Zhang, X., Pablos, P. O. D. & Zhou, Z. (2013). Effect of knowledge sharing visibility on incentive-based relationship in Electronic Knowledge Management Systems: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior , 29(2), 307-313.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Saad, A., & Haron, H. (2013). A Case Study of Academics’ Knowledge Sharing Motivations at Malaysian Public Academic Institutions. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 4(9), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v4i9.130

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2013-09-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Education and Vocational Research welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission