Author

  • Gim Chien Wei Gabriel

    • Wawasan Open University School of Business and Administration, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Mat Desa Nasina

    • Universiti Sains Malaysia School of Distance Education (Management), Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

This paper aims to study the impact of boundaryless career attitude (organisational mobility preference and boundaryless mindset) on organisational commitment (affective commitment, continuance commitment, and normative commitment). Specifically, we predicted that employees who demonstrate a high boundaryless career attitude would be less committed to their employers. A sample of 132 public accountants was drawn from 15 accounting firms in Penang. A three-stage sampling was used in this study started with cluster sampling, followed by systematic sampling, and finally convenience sampling. Multiple regression analysis was used in the study and the results shown that organisational mobility preference was significantly negatively related to affective commitment, continuance commitment, and normative commitment. It also revealed that boundaryless mindset was significantly negatively related only to continuance commitment. Theoretically, the findings mainly supported the findings by Briscoe and Finkelstein (2009). Practically, the findings implied that practitioners of accounting firms should implement policies to cater to the needs of the boundaryless career actors by providing career relevant skills, training, meaningful jobs, and opportunities for secondment. In conclusion, this research revealed the growing importance of the boundaryless career attitude in affecting organisational commitment among public accountants in Penang, Malaysia.

Keywords

References

  • Arthur, M. B. (1994). The boundaryless career: a new perspective for organizational inquiry. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 295-306.
  • Arthur, M. B. & Rousseau, D. (1996). The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M. & Gilbert, N. L. (1996). Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39 , 464-475.
  • Bellesi, B. E. (1999). The changing American workforce. Management Review , 3(9).
  • Briscoe, J. P. & Finkelstein, L. M. (2009). The new career and organizational commitment: Do boundaryless and protean attitudes make a difference? Career Development International, 14, 242-260.
  • Briscoe, J. P. & Hall, D. T. (2006). The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers: Combinations and implications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 4-18.
  • Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D. T. & Demuth, R. L. F. (2006). Protean and boundaryless careers: An empirical exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 30-47.
  • Cheramie, R. A., Sturman, M. C. & Walsh, K. (2007). Executive career management: Switching organizations and the boundaryless career. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 359-374.
  • DeFillippi, R. J. & Arthur, M. B. (1994). The boundaryless career: A competency based perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 15, 307-324.
  • Fernandez, V. & Enache, M. (2008). Exploring the relationship between protean and boundaryless career attitudes and affective commitment through the lens of a fuzzy set QCA methodology. Intangible Capital , 1(4), 31-66.
  • Eby, L. T., Butts, M. & Lockwood, A. (2003). Predictors of success in the era of the boundaryless career. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 689-708.
  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
  • Granrose, C. S. & Baccili, P. A. (2006). Do psychological contracts include boundaryless or protean careers? Career Development International, 11, 163-182.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. 7th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Hall, D. T. (1996). Protean careers of the 21st Century. Academy of Management Executive, 10(4), 8-16.
  • Hipple, S. (1998). Contingent work: Results from the second survey. Monthly Labor Review , 3, 22-35.
  • Johnson, R. E., Chang, D. C. H. & Yang, L. Q. (2010). Commitment and motivation at work: The relevance of employee identity and regulatory focus. The Academy of Management Review, 35, 226-245.
  • Ketchand, A. A. & Strawser, J. R. (2001). Multiple dimensions of organizational commitment: Implications for future accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13, 221-251.
  • Lawler, E. J. & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 217-244.
  • Meyer, J. & Allen, N. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.
  • Meyer, J. & Allen, N. (1997). Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.
  • Meyer, J. P. & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299-326.
  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L. & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
  • Parker, R. J. & Kohlmeyer-III, J. M. (2005). Organizational justice and turnover in public accounting firms: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 357-369.
  • Ravendran, A. (2008). Brain drain or global mobility. Accountants Today , 1, 20-24.
  • Robinson, S. L. & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245-259.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121-139.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389-400.
  • Sullivan, S. E. & Arthur, M. B. (2006). The evolution of the boundaryless career concept: Examining physical and psychological mobility. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 19-29.
  • Tomlinson, P., Abdullah, N. A. & Kolesnikov-Jessop, A. (2008). Dispatch (Asia version), Accounting and Business. Asia: ACCA. http://www.accaglobal.com/members/publications /accounting_business/archive/2008/February/3065956 (accessed February 17, 2011).

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Gabriel, G. C. W., & Nasina, M. D. (2012). The Boundaryless Career Attitude and Organisational Commitment among Public Accountants in Penang, Malaysia. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 3(9), 304-312. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v3i9.714

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2012-09-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Social and Development Sciences welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission