Abstract
Assessment of patient satisfaction is a measurement that obtains information or ratings from patients about their perception of the services being provided from an organization, hospital, physician, or healthcare provider and plays an increasingly important role toward accountability among health care providers. The present study aimed at comparing the patient’s perception of services being provided in the government and private sectors. 120 patients (60 from each sector) natively from Karnataka, India with knowledge of English participated in this study. Subjects were asked to rate their experiences before, during and after consultation. A checklist to rate the patient satisfaction was developed. The checklist comprised of 11 questions covering the most important domains pertaining to patient satisfaction about the health care services provided. Obtained responses were statistically compared using independent t test. Significant differences in the satisfaction levels of the subjects in the government and the private set ups were seen at p< 0.05 (t=2.921, 118). In government sector patients were better satisfied with certain aspects like the cost factor, information provided about the problem and guidance regarding intervention whereas the patients in the private sector were better satisfied with the orientation to the department, information furnished about the problem, comfort and privacy during the testing procedure.
Keywords
References
- Bertakis, K. D., Roter, D. & Putnam, S. M. (1991). The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction. Journal of Fam Pract , 32, 175-81.
- Buller, M. K. & Buller, D. B. (1987). Journal of health and social Behavior , 28, 375 – 388.
- Cole, S. A. & Bird, J. (2000). The medical interview: the three-function approach. St Louis: Mosby Inc.
- Coulehan, J. L. & Bloch, M. R. (1992). The medical interview: a primer for students of the art, second edition. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company.
- Guadagnino, C. (2003). Role of patient satisfaction Press Ganey Associates
- Hall, J., Feldstein, M., Fretwell, M. D., Rowe, J. W. & Epstein, A. M. (1990). Older patients’ health status and satisfaction with medical care in an HMO population. Med Care , 28, 261-70.
- Levinson, W., Roter, D. L., Mullooly, J. P., Dull, V. T. & Frankel, R. M. (1997). Physicien-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. Journal of American Medical Association, 19, 277(7), 553-9.
- Ong, L. M., de Haes, J. C., Hoos, A. M. & Lammes, F. B. (1995). Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Social Science Med , 40, 903-18.
- Singh, R., Singh, A., Fish, R., McLean, D., Anderson, D. R. & Singh, G. (2009). A Patient Safety Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE). Journal of Patient Safety , 5(2), 55-60.
- Utpal, D. (2004). Genesis and mechanics of malpractice suits - Minimizing the risks, Indian Journal of Surgery, 66(5), 301-303.
- Weinman, W. S. J. & Dale, J. (1998). Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction: a review. Fam Pract , 15, 480-92.
- Woolley, F. R., Kane, R. L., Hughes, C. C. & Wright, D. D. The effects of doctor-patient communication on satisfaction and outcome of care. Soc Sci Med , 12, 123-8.
Downloads
No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.
How to Cite
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Rashmi Ananth Pai, Jayashree S. Bhat (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
Keywords
Section
Published
Submissions
Have research to publish? Journal of Social and Development Sciences welcomes submissions.
Make a Submission