Author

  • Muhammad Baharuddin Zubakhrum Tjenreng

    • Government Science, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
    • Indonesia

Abstract

Indonesian recently held a regional head concurrent elections in the first phase on December 9, 2015. Concurrent elections has been a historic moment for Indonesia to elect regional heads organized and structured massively. Concurrent election significance for Indonesian politics, especially at the local level, not only to read limited local democratic party, but rather an instrument for strengthening the democratic process. This research seeks to examine and analyze the democracy strengthening through concurrent election implementation in order to improve political stability of national development. In carrying out this study, researchers using qualitative methods. Whereabout the main data from this study is the researchers observation result on the concurrent election day, which is supported by several secondary data from the media. Featured models concurrent election (local concurrent election) is believed to be the best solution to counter the problems remaining in the elections execution, especially in two important reasons: First, the elections implementation effectiveness in order to realize the elections are more qualified and dignified from both the process and elections outcome aspects; second, the elections efficiency especially from the budget efficiency aspect which must be issued by the state to finance the electoral process.

Keywords

References

  • Andersen, D. J. (2011). Pushing the Limits of Democracy: Concurrent Elections and Cognitive Limitations of Voters. New Jersey: The State University of New Jersey.
  • Azhari, A. F. (2004). Reformasi Pemilu dan Agenda Konsolidasi Demokrasi, Perspektif Ketatanegaraan. Jurisprudence, 1(2).
  • Dahl, R. A. (1999). On Democracy. Yale: University Press.
  • Gaffar, A. (2004). Politik Indonesia: Transisi menuju Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  • Geys, B. (2006). Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research. Electoral Studies 25. Berlin: Elsevier.
  • Hayness, J. (2000). Demokrasi dan Masyarakat Sipil di Dunia Ketiga. Jakarta: Obor.
  • Held, D. (1987). Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Hook, S. (1975). The Encyclopedia Americana. New York: Americana Coorporation.
  • Huntington, S. P. (1997). Gelombang Demokratisasi Ketiga. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
  • Lijphart, A. (1994). Presidentialism and Majoritarian Democracy: Theoretical Observations, in Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela, (eds.), The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Linz, J. J. & Arturo, V. (1994). The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • LIPI. (2014). Position Paper, Pemilu Nasional Serentak 2019. Jakarta: LIPI.
  • Mainwaring, S. (1993). Presidentialism, Multipartism and Democracy: The Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies, 26(2).
  • Mayo, H. B. (2005). Mewujudkan Demokrasi Bermakna: Masalah dan Pilihan Indonesia. Jakarta: Demos.
  • Nordholt, H. S. & Ireen, H. (2006). Indonesian in Transition. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  • Nordholt, H. S. & Gerry, V. K. (2009). Politik Lokal di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
  • Pahlevi, I. (2014). Pilkada Serentak dalam RUU Pilkada. Bulletin INFO Kemendagri Brief, VI(2)/II/ P3DI/Jan/2014.
  • Samuels, D. (2000). Concurrent Elections, Discordant Result: Presidentialism, Federalism, and Governance in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 33(1), 1-20.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (2012). Capitalism Socialism and Democracy. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  • Sorensen, G. (2003). Demokrasi dan Demokratisasi: Proses dan Prospek dalam Sebuah Dunia yang Sedang Berubah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  • Suhelmi, A. (2001). Pemikiran Politik Barat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  • Ubaedillah, A. & Rozak, A. (2006). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan: Demokrasi, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Masyarakat Madani. Jakarta: ICCE UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
  • Law No 22 of 2014 regarding the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors
  • Law No. 1 of 2015 on Perppu Determination No. 1 of 2014 On the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors Become Law
  • Law No. 8 of 2015 on the Amendment of Act No. 1 of 2015 Concerning Determination No. 1 of 2014 Perppu On the Election of the Governor, Regent, and Mayor of the city Become Law
  • Law No 9 of 2015 on Local Government
  • Constitutional Court Decision No.22-24 / PUU / VI / 2008, dated December 19, 2008.
  • Supriyanto, D., Source: http://www.rumahpemilu.org/in/read/4679/treshold-dalam%20discourse%20elections [Accessed: January, 15, 2016].
  • http://www.konfrontasi.com/content/nasional/untuk%20anulir%20pilkada%20tak%20langsung%20sby%20keluarkan%20perppu [Accessed: January, 15, 2016].
  • http://www.kpu.go.id [Accessed: January, 15, 2016].

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Tjenreng, M. B. Z. (2016). Democratic System Strengthening Through Concurrent Election Implementation To Improve Political Stability and National Development. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 7(2), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v7i2.1306

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2016-07-06

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Social and Development Sciences welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission