Author

  • Andrew Osehi Enaifoghe

    • Department of Public Administration, University of Zululand KwaDlangezwa, South Africa
    • South Africa

Abstract

This article explores the present crisis of democratic governance or administration in Africa and examines the elective capability of deliberative majority rules system of democracy, in which the desire of the general public is educated by mindful, engaged citizen’s commitment and conversation. There are various questions needing answers; are the various and spellbound citizenry even equipped for consultation? How likely is amass thought of deliberation to achieve a very much contemplated choice? Wouldn’t it gather consultation reproduce a similar power lopsided characteristics blocking different sorts of talk? Deliberative models are displayed in principle and practical discourse, with contextual investigations including the furious populism of the Brexit vote, the ascent of deliberative components. What the contributing creators do share is the acknowledgement that the authenticity of appointive portrayal or representatives endures when individuals in the majority rule system of governments end up frustrated, disillusioned, and repelled. This study gives challenging and convincing thoughts regarding how to re-establish confidence in popular democratic governments by making them stronger and responsive. This study adopted a qualitative method of analysis.

Keywords

References

  • Christopher, H., Achen Larry, M. & Bartels. (2015). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2015).
  • Offe, C. (2011). Crisis and Innovation of Liberal Democracy: Can Deliberation Be Institutionalized? Czech Sociological Review, 47(3), 447–473.
  • Dey, I. (2005). Qualitative data analysis. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Dryzek, J. (2007). Theory, Evidence and the Tasks of Deliberation. In Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? Ed. Shawn W. Rosenberg. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Fölscher, A. (2007). Participatory Budgeting in Asia. In Participatory Budgeting, ed. Anwar Shah. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
  • Fournier, P., Henk van der Kolk, Kenneth C., Andre, B. & Jonathan, R. (2011). When Citizens Decide: Lessons from Citizen Assemblies on Electoral Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fung, A. & Wright, E. O. (2003). Thinking About Empowered Participatory Governance. In Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, ed. Archon Fung and Eric Olin Wright. New York: Verso.
  • Goodhart, M., Fung, A., Gauri, V., Gloppen, S., Haagh, L., Heller, P., Pateman, C., Peruzzotti, E., Rudiger, A., Schmitz, P. H., Standing, G., Wampler B. & Wing S. (2011). Democratic Imperatives: Innovations in Rights, Participation, and Economic Citizenship. Report of the Task Force on Democracy, Economic Security, and Social Justice in a Volatile World. ( http://bit.ly/2011taskforce). Accessed Oct 13, 2018.
  • Goodin, R. & Dryzek, J. (2006). Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini Publics. Politics & Society, 34(2), 219–44.
  • Goodin, R. (2008). Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice after the Deliberative Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Iris, M. Y. (1996). Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy, in Democracy and Difference, ed. Seyla Benhabib (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996), 60–74.
  • Iris, M. Y. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000)
  • James, S. F. & Mansbridge, J. (2017). The Prospects & Limits of Deliberative Democracy. Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences.
  • Joseph, A. & Schumpeter. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 263.
  • Joseph, B. (1994). The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).
  • Jürgen, H. (1996). Further Reflections on the Public Sphere, in Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1996), 421–461.
  • Jürgen, H. & Thomas, B. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1989), 27.
  • Larry, D. (2015). Facing Up to Democratic Recession, Journal of Democracy 26 (1) (January 2015), 141 – 155.
  • Mogalakwe, M. (2006). Research Report. The Use of Documentary Research Methods in Social Research. African Sociological Review, 10(1), 221-230.
  • Mutz, D. (2008). Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory? American Review of Political Science, 11, 521–38.
  • Participatory Budgeting Unit. (2010). Now Is the Time to Start Trusting Citizens on Budgets. ( http://www. participatorybudgeting.org.uk /news-and-events/news/ now-is-the-time-to-trust-citizens-on-budgets). Accessed November 16, 2018.
  • Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory Democracy Revisited. APSA Presidential Address. March 2012
  • Pateman, C. (1989). The Patriarchal Welfare State. In The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
  • Princeton, N. J. (2015). The legitimacy of the distortions from economic inequality, see Martin Gilens, Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2014).
  • Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. (2005). A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251–90.
  • Samuel, P. H. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Oklahoma City: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991).
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper. Service Agency Communities in One World. 2010. International Congress on Models of Participatory Budgeting. Dialog Global 24.
  • Shah, A. (2007). Participatory Budgeting. Washington, DC: The World Bank. ( http://siteresources. worldbank.org/PSGLP/Resources/Participatory Budgeting.pdf ). Accessed March 5, 2011.
  • Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Steven, L., Lucan, A. & Way. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
  • Thompson, D. F. (2008). Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science. American Review of Political Science, 11, 497–520.
  • Warren, M. E. (1996). What Should We Expect from More Democracy? Radically Democratic Responses to Politics. Political Theory, 24(2), 241–70.
  • Warren, M. E. & Pearse, H. (2008). Introduction: Democratic Renewal and Deliberative Democracy. In Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, ed. Mark E. Warren and Hilary Pearse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press World Bank. 1996. The
  • World Bank (1996). Brazil: Toward a More Inclusive and Effective Participatory Budget in Porto Alegre, Volume I. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Enaifoghe, A. O. (2019). Deliberative Politics through Citizens’ Participatory Democracy: A model for Africa Political Processes. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 10(1(S), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v10i1(S).2807

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Andrew Osehi Enaifoghe (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 10 No. 1(S) (2019) Governance, Inclusion & Financial Access View issue contents

Published

2019-04-24

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Social and Development Sciences welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission