Author

  • Shiva Zokaee

    • Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
    • Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Seyed Babak Ebrahimi

    • Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
    • Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Mostafa Ghazizadeh

    • University of Shahed, Tehran, Iran
    • Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract

As moving businesses from face-to-face trading, mail order and telephone order to electronic commerce over open networks such as the Internet, there be an exponentially growth in electronic payment transactions. Therefore, monitoring and evaluating the current electronic payment systems greatly affects the efficiency of money transactions, trades and, finally, the overall economy of the countries. In this paper, the Iranian e-payment systems are examined as a special case. The aim is to examine and evaluate the current epayment systems, and rank they based on the experts opinions. Considering the nature of the gathered data, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), as a decision-making method, is used to evaluate the data. The findings of this research are intended to be useful for both academic researchers and companies planning to adopt or to improve an electronic payment system.

Keywords

References

  • Bryson, N. & Joseph, A. (1999). Generating consensus priority point vectors: a logarithmic goal programming approach. Computers & Operations Research , 26, 637-43.
  • Crawford, G. & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology , 29, 387-405.
  • Crede, A. (1998). Electronic Payment Systems, Electronic Money & the Internet: The United Kingdom Experience to Date. TA-Datenbank-Nachrichten , 2, 29-39.
  • Hung, S. Y., Chang, C. M. & Yu, T. J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly , 23, 97-122.
  • Jing, Y. (2009). On-line Payment and Security of E-commerce. Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Web Information Systems and Applications , 46-50.
  • Johnson, O. E. G. (1998). Payment systems, monetary policy, and the role of the central bank. Washington, DC. International Monetary Fund.
  • Khiaonarong, T. (2000). Electronic payment systems development in Thailand. International Journal of Information Management , 20, 59-72.
  • Lootsma, F. A. (1999). Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference judgment. Socio Economic Planning Sciences , 42, 192-197.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting and resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Shim, J. P. (1989). Bibliographical research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Socio Economic Planning Sciences, 23, 161-167.
  • Tsiakis, T. & Sthephanides, G. (2005). The concept of security and trust in electronic payments. Computers and Security , 24, 10-15.
  • World Bank Report. (1990). Financial systems and development. World Bank Policy and Research Series. Washington, D.C.
  • Yu, H. C., His, K. H. & Kou, P. J. (2002). Electronic Payment Systems: an analysis and comparison of types. Technology in Society , 24, 331-347.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Zokaee, S., Ebrahimi, S. B., & Ghazizadeh, M. (2026). Electronic Payment Systems Evaluation: A Case Study in Iran. Information Management and Business Review, 4(3), 120-127. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v4i3.972

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2026-08-12

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission