Author

  • Jianjun LU

    • College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
    • Australian Maritime College, Launceston, Australia
    • China
  • Shozo Tokinaga

    • Graduate School of Economics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
    • Japan
  • Wen Tian

    • College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
    • China

Abstract

This paper formulate an option model considers supplier's reaction as the profit sharing in module production, and analyses it by the agent theory. A dynamic environment in the model of the system of the production of modules of three layers is assumed, and the maker and the supplier are modeled by the technique of Genetic Programming (GP) as an agent who takes the action of selfoptimization. As result, the condition that the agent can exist continuously in the market is requested. In conclusion, violent competition and the selection of the similar agent are found even in the model of the option to consider the profit sharing and the reaction.

Keywords

References

  • Agrawal, S., Delage, E., Peters, M., Wang, Z. & Ye, Y. (2011). A Unified Framework for Dynamic Prediction Market Design. Operations Research, 59 (3), 550-568.
  • Agrawal, V. & Seshadri, S. (2000). Impact of uncertainty and risk aversion on price and order quantity in the newsvendor problem. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2 (4), 410-422422.
  • Badr, Y., Biennier, F. & Tata, S. (2011). The integration of corporate security strategies in collaborative business processes. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 4 (3), 243-254254.
  • Bendoly, E., Perry-Smith, J. E. & Bachrach, D. G. (2010). The perception of difficulty in project-work planning and its impact on resource sharing. Journal of Operations Management, 28 (5), 385-397.
  • Bernstein, F. & DeCroix, G. A. (2004). Decentralized pricing and capacity decisions in a multitier system with modular assembly. Management Science, 50 (9), 1293-1308.
  • Dada, M., Petruzzi, N. C. & Schwarz, L. B. (2007). A newsvendor's procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. [Article]. M&Som-Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9 (1), 9-32.
  • Huchzermeier, A. & Loch, C. H. (2001). Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R&D. Management Science, 47 (1), 85-101.
  • Hult, G. T. M., Craighead, C. W. & Ketchen, D. J. (2010). Risk Uncertainty and Supply Chain Decisions: A Real Options Perspective. Decision Sciences, 41 (3), 435-458.
  • Jaber, M. Y., Osman, I. H. & Guiffrida, A. L. (2006). Coordinating a three-level supply chain with price discounts, price dependent demand, and profit sharing. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 2 (1-2), 28-48.
  • Kamrad, B. & Siddique, A. (2004). Supply contracts, profit sharing, switching, and reaction options. Management Science, 50 (1), 64-82.
  • Kannegiesser, M. & Guenther, H. O. (2011). An integrated optimization model for managing the global value chain of a chemical commodities manufacturer. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62 (4), 711-721.
  • Katok, E. & Wu, D. Y. (2009). Contracting in Supply Chains: A Laboratory Investigation. [Article]. Management Science, 55 (12), 1953-1968.
  • Kogut, B. & Kulatilaka, N. (1994). Operating Flexibility, Global Manufacturing, and The Option Value of a Multinational Network. Management Science, 40 (1), 123-139.
  • Lo-Nigro, G. & Abbate, L. (2011). Risk assessment and profit sharing in business networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 131 (1), 234-241.
  • Lu, J., Kishikawa, Y. & Tokinaga, S. (2007). Realization of feature description systems for clusters by rule generation based on genetic programming and its applications. Electronics and Communications in Japan Part Ii-Electronics, 90 (9), 87-97.
  • Lu, J., Tokinaga, S. & Ikeda, Y. (2006). Explanatory rule extraction based on the trained neural network and the genetic programming. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 49 (1), 66-82.
  • Martzoukos, S. H. (2009). Real R&D options and optimal activation of two-dimensional random controls. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60 (6), 843-858.
  • Masuchun, W., Davis, S. & Rangsaritratsamee, R. (2006). System for supply network management. Information Technology & Management, 7 (4), 315-333.
  • Oliver, R. K. & Webber, M. D. (1992). Supply-chain management: Logistics catches up with strategy (reprint from Outlook 1982). In M. Christopher (Ed.), Logistics : the strategic issues (63-75). London.
  • Petruzzi, N. C. & Dada, M. (1999). Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. [Article]. Operations Research, 47 (2), 183-194.
  • Piccolo, S. & Reisinger, M. (2011). Exclusive Territories and Manufacturers' Collusion. Management Science, 57 (7), 1250-1266.
  • Ruiliang, Y. (2008). Profit sharing and firm performance in the manufacturer-retailer dual-channel supply chain. Electronic Commerce Research, 8 (3), 155-172.
  • Schweitzer, M. E. & Cachon, G. P. (2000). Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. [Article]. Management Science, 46 (3), 404-420.
  • Song, Z. J., Zhang, Y. & Yang, J. M. (2009). Closed-loop Outsourcing Logistics Supply Chain Coordination Management Based on the Profit-sharing Contract. New York: Ieee.
  • Spinler, S. & Huchzermeier, A. (2006). The valuation of options on capacity with cost and demand uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 171 (3), 915-934.
  • Stadtler, H. (2005). Supply chain management and advanced planning - basics, overview and challenges. [Review]. European Journal of Operational Research, 163 (3), 575-588.
  • Stevenson, W. (2008). Operations Management (10 edition ed.): McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Xiao, G., Dunne, K. & O'Sullivan, D. (2006). Development of an online supplier selection module. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 7 (1), 52-6767.
  • Yan, Q., Ruoxuan, W., Vakharia, A. J., Yuwen, C. & Seref, M. M. H. (2011). The newsvendor problem: Review and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 213 (2), 361-374.
  • Yu, R., Liu, L., Shen, Y. & Liu, L. (2007). Factors influencing supply chain members profits with cost information sharing. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 47 (5), 749-752.
  • Yue, J. F., Chen, B. T. & Wang, M. C. (2006). Expected value of distribution information for the newsvendor problem. [Article]. Operations Research, 54 (6), 1128-1136.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

LU, J., Tokinaga, S., & Tian, W. (2026). Analysis of the Dynamical Behavior of Firms in a Three Layered Modular Assembly Model. Information Management and Business Review, 4(3), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v4i3.973

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2026-08-12

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission