Author

  • N. Sureshkumar PP Narayanan

    • University of East London, London, England
    • United Kingdom
  • Farha Ghapar

    • Universiti Poly-Tech Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Li Lian Chew

    • Binary University, Binary Business School, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Veera Pandiyan Kaliani Sundram

    • RIG–Sustainable Supply Chain Logistics / Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Babudass M. Naidu

    • Bumi Sendayan Sdn. Bhd., Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Azimah Daud

    • RIG–Sustainable Supply Chain Logistics / Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted global supply chains, exposed their vulnerabilities and underscored the urgent need for enhanced resilience. In Malaysia, the pandemic's impact on supply chains has been profound, prompting a re-evaluation of existing strategies and frameworks. This study explores the integration of Resource-Based Theory (RBT) and Contingency Theory (CT) to enhance supply chain resilience in Malaysia. Through in-depth case studies and semi-structured interviews with senior managers and supply chain professionals, this research identifies key factors contributing to the successful implementation of an integrated resilience framework. The findings reveal that firms leveraging advanced technology, skilled workforce, and strategic partnerships can maintain operational efficiency and adaptability. Context-specific strategies such as diversifying suppliers, local sourcing, strategic stockpiling, and flexible logistics solutions are essential in responding to disruptions. Common challenges include high initial costs, coordination issues, regulatory hurdles, and cultural resistance to change. The integration of RBT and CT results in improved supply chain visibility, flexibility, robustness, and stakeholder collaboration. This study contributes to the academic discourse by offering practical insights for firms seeking to enhance supply chain resilience. It underscores the importance of combining internal strengths with adaptive strategies tailored to the external environment. The findings provide valuable guidance for both academia and industry in developing more robust and adaptive supply chain strategies in the post-pandemic landscape. Future research should explore the integration of RBT and CT across different contexts and industries and investigate the role of emerging technologies in enhancing supply chain resilience.

Keywords

References

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  • Brandon-Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C. W., & Petersen, K. J. (2014). A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12050
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., Kaisar, S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148, 102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271
  • Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275
  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage Publications.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  • Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904-2915. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727
  • Kaufmann, L., & Roesch, J. (2012). Constraints to supply chain integration: The impact of organizational culture. Journal of Business Logistics, 33(3), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0000-0000.2012.01045.x
  • Mkumbo, F. A. E., Ibrahim, A. R., Salleh, A. L., Sundram, V. P. K. & Atikah S. B. (2019). The Influence of Supply Chain Practices and Performance Measurement Practices towards Firm Performance, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 809-819.
  • Narayanan, N. S. P., Ghapar, F., Chew, L. L., Sundram, V. P. K., Jayamani, U., & Muhammad, A. (2024a). Measuring the Unmeasured: Exploring the Concept of “Supply Chain Quotient”[SCQ]. Information Management and Business Review, 16(2 (I) S), 36-43.
  • Narayanan, N. S. P., Ghapar, F., Chew, L. L., Sundram, V. P. K., Jayamani, U., & Muhammad, A. (2024b). Optimizing Working Capital Management in Supply Chain Finance: A Multi-Dimensional Approach. Information Management and Business Review, 16(2 (I) S), 44-52.
  • Omar, R., Hassan, N. H., Zawawi, N. F. M., & Syed Azhar, S. N. (2020). Developing supply chain resilience through strategic partnerships: Insights from the Malaysian context. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 101–110.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Pettit, T. J., Croxton, K. L., & Fiksel, J. (2013). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12009
  • Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873
  • Selvaraju, M., Beleya, P., & Sundram, V. P. K. (2017). Supply chain cost reduction using mitigation & resilient strategies in the hypermarket retail business. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 6(2), 116-121.
  • Sivan, S., Anuar, R., Krishnasamy, T., Bah rin, A. S., Narayanan, N. S. P., & Sundram, V. P. K. (2024b). Integrating Safety Practices into the Supply Chain for Sustainable Development in Malaysia's Building Construction Sites. Information Management and Business Review, 16(1 (I) S), 24-32.
  • Sivan, S., Anuar, R., Krishnasamy, T., Bahrin, A. S., Narayanan, N. S. P., & Sundram, V. P. K. (2024a). Optimizing Safety Practices and Culture: A Comprehensive Examination through Perception Surveys in Malaysia's Logistics Industry. Information Management and Business Review, 16(1 (I) S), 33-38.
  • Sousa, R., & Voss, C. A. (2008). Contingency research in operations management practices. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.06.001
  • Sundram, V. P. K., Rajagopal P., Atikah S. B. & Subramaniam, G. (2018). The Role of Supply Chain Integration on Green Practices and Performance in a Supply Chain Context: A Conceptual Approach to Future Research, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(1), 95-104.
  • Sundram, V. P. K., Rajagopal, P., Nur Atiqah, Z. A., Atikah, S. B., Appasamy, G., & Zarina, A. M. (2018). Supply chain responsiveness in an Asian global electronic manufacturing firm: ABX energy (M). International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(2), 23-31.
  • Sundram, V.P.K., Ghapar, Chew, LL and Muhammad, A. (2023). Engaging Lean Six Sigma Approach Using DMAIC Methodology for Supply Chain Logistics Recruitment Improvement, Information Management and Business Review 15 (2), 46-53.
  • Sundram, V.P.K., Ghapar, F. Osman, MF., Chew, LL and Muhammad, A. (2023). Lean Six-Sigma Approach for Sub-Contract Licensing and its Process Improvement across the Manufacturing Supply Chain using GUT Priority Matrix, Information Management and Business Review 15 (2), 1-8.
  • Sundram, V.P.K., Noor Malinjasari, A., Ibrahim, Irwan., Nazura, M.S., & Atikah, S.B. (2020), Supply Chain Management: Key Concepts and Case Studies, MLSCA, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
  • Vatumalae, V., Rajagopal, P., & Sundram, V. P. K. (2020). Warehouse operations measurement in hypermarket retailers: A review of the literature. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(5), 1276.
  • Vatumalae, V., Rajagopal, P., Sundram, V. P. K., & Hua, Z. (2022). A study of retail hypermarket warehouse inventory management in Malaysia. SMART Journal of Business Management Studies, 18(1), 71-79.
  • Wamba, S. F., & Akter, S. (2019). Understanding supply chain analytics capabilities and agility for data-rich environments. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(6), 887-912. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2019-0025
  • Wang, Y., Jie, F., & Abareshi, A. (2015). The measurement model of supply chain uncertainty and risk in the Australian courier industry. Operations and Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0240156
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource?based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  • Yong, J., Haron, H., & Li, T. (2021). Managing supply chain disruptions in Malaysia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Journal of Business and Management Research, 10(2), 45–58.
  • Zetty Zahureen, M.Y., Nur Zahidah, B., Ismadi I., Bujang, I. & Sundram, V.P.K. (2020), Quantitative Research Methods, Asian Academy, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Narayanan, N. S. P., Ghapar, F., Chew, L. L., Sundram, V. P. K., Naidu, B. M., & Daud, A. (2024). Integrating Resource-Based Theory and Contingency Theory for Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience in Malaysia: A Post-Pandemic Analysis. Information Management and Business Review, 16(3S(I)a), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i3S(I)a.4125

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2024-10-27

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission