Author

  • Zetty Zahureen Mohd Yusoff

    • Faculty of Business Management, UiTM, Cawangan Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Nik Rozila Nik Mohd Masdek

    • Faculty of Business Management, UiTM, Cawangan Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Adibah Alawiyah Osman

    • Faculty of Business Management, UiTM, Cawangan Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Ariq Syazwan Azahar

    • Swift Logistic TA Sdn Bhd, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Norhusniyati Husin

    • Faculty of Business Management, UiTM, Cawangan Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Zahirah Hamid Ghul

    • Faculty of Business Management, UiTM, Cawangan Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

The overnight interbank rate is an essential factor for central banks to impact economic activity and preserve financial stability. It refers to the rate at which banks lend and borrow short-term funds from one another, often overnight. The overnight interbank rate plays a crucial role in the transmission mechanism of monetary policy since changes in the rate can affect the cost of borrowing and the availability of credit, which in turn impacts consumption, investment, and economic activity. According to Bank Negara Malaysia (2021), overnight transactions in the interbank market run in parallel to the existing Kuala Lumpur Interbank Offered Rate (KLIBOR). This study intends to explore time series data from 1991 to 2021 to identify the relationship between dependent and independent variables based on the ordinary least square method (OLS). Meanwhile, the study investigates whether macroeconomic variables influence the overnight interbank rate in Malaysia. Therefore, this study uses the determinant of economic indicators of unemployment (UR), domestic private credit (DGR), gross domestic product (GDP), foreign exchange (FER), and inflation (I). The data comes primarily from the World Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank (FRED). Based on results demonstrate that unemployment and inflation have the most significant impacts on monetary policy. The reason why unemployment has an impact on economic growth is that high unemployment frequently indicates resource underuse, pointing to the need for stimulative monetary policy (such as decreasing interest rates) to promote investment and expenditure and promote economic growth. To slow down the economy and cut expenditure, central banks typically raise interest rates in response to rising inflation. On the other hand, declining inflation may lead to rate reductions to boost the economy. This is a significant element of inflation in monetary policy.

Keywords

References

  • Abd Rahman, N. H., Ismail, S., Ridzuan, A. R., Abd Samad, K. (2020). The Issue of Graduate Unemployment in Malaysia: Post Covid-19. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 10(10), 834-841.
  • Bank Negara Malaysia, (2021). Malaysia Overnight Rate. Pg 2-8 https://www.bnm.gov.my/documents/20124/938039/PD_MYOR.pdf
  • Benazi?, M., & Rami, J. (2016). Monetary policy and unemployment in Croatia. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 29(1), 1038-1049.
  • Bernoth, K., & Pick, A. (2011). Forecasting the fragility of the banking and insurance sectors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(4), 807-818.
  • Bhanumurthy, N. R., & Kumawat, L. (2020). Financial globalization and economic growth in South Asia. South Asia Economic Journal, 21(1), 31-57.
  • Christoffel, K. P., & Linzert, T. (2005). The role of real wage rigidity and labor market frictions for unemployment and inflation dynamics.
  • Chicheke, A. (2009). Monetary Policy. Inflation, Unemployment, and the Phillips Curve in South Africa (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Fort Hare).
  • Ellison, M., & Sargent, T. J. (2015). The welfare cost of business cycles with idiosyncratic consumption risk and a preference for robustness. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7(2), 40-57.
  • Ferrari, M., Kearns, J., & Schrimpf, A. (2021). Monetary policy’s rising FX impact in the era of ultra-low rates. Journal of Banking & Finance, 129, 106142.
  • Goh, K. L., & Yong, S. L. (2007). Bank lending and monetary policy: the effects of a structural shift in interest rates. Economics Bulletin, 5(5), 1-14.
  • Georgiadis, G., & Mehl, A. (2016). Financial globalization and monetary policy effectiveness. Journal of International Economics, 103, 200-212.
  • Hosono, K. (2006). The transmission mechanism of monetary policy in Japan: Evidence from banks' balance sheets. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 20(3), 380-405.
  • Ioannidou, V., Ongena, S., & Peydró, J. L. (2015). Monetary policy, risk-taking, and pricing: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Review of Finance, 19(1), 95-144.
  • Ivankova, N. V. (2023). Volume 12: Qualitative, Multimethod, and Mixed Methods Research. In International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition) (pp. xix-xxi).
  • Jahan, S., Mahmud, A. S., & Papageorgiou, C. (2014). What is Keynesian economics? International Monetary Fund, 51(3), 53-54.
  • Jiménez, G., Ongena, S., Peydró, J. L., & Saurina, J. (2014). Hazardous times for monetary policy: What do twenty?three million bank loans say about the effects of monetary policy on credit risk?taking? Econometrica, 82(2), 463-505.
  • Kassim, S. H., & Abdul Manap, T. A. (2008). The information content of the Islamic interbank money market rate in Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 1(4), 304-312.
  • Kassim, S. H., & Shabri Abd. Majid, M. (2010). Impact of financial shocks on Islamic banks: Malaysian evidence during 1997 and 2007 financial crises. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(4), 291-305.
  • Kumawat, L., & Bhanumurthy, N. R. (2018). Regime shifts in India’s monetary policy response function. Indian Economic Review, 53, 167-182.
  • Lee, H., & Kim, T. B. (2023). The effectiveness of labor market indicators for conducting monetary policy: Evidence from the Korean economy. Economic Modelling, 118, 106098.
  • Lütkepohl, H. (2005). A new introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Ma, Y., & Lin, X. (2016). Financial development and the effectiveness of monetary policy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 68, 1-11.
  • Prasad, E., Rogoff, K., Wei, S.-J., & Kose, M. A. (2005). Effects of Financial Globalization on Developing Countries: Some Empirical Evidence. In W. Tseng & D. Cowen (Eds.), India’s and China’s Recent Experience with Reform and Growth (pp. 201-228). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Stockhammer, E. (2022). Post-Keynesian macroeconomic foundations for comparative political economy. Politics & Society, 50(1), 156-187.
  • Studenmund, A. H., & Johnson, B. K. (2017). Multicollinearity. A practical guide to using econometrics, 252.
  • Trigari, A. (2006). The role of search frictions and bargaining for inflation dynamics.
  • Zhang, C., & Clovis, J. (2010). The New Keynesian Phillips Curve of rational expectations: A serial correlation extension. Journal of Applied Economics, 13(1), 159-179.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Mohd Yusoff, Z. Z., Nik Mohd Masdek, N. R., Osman, A. A., Azahar, A. S., Husin, N., & Ghul, Z. H. (2024). The Determinants of Monetary Policy in Malaysia: Impact on Economic Activity. Information Management and Business Review, 16(3S(I)a), 135-143. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i3S(I)a.4205

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2024-10-27

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission