Abstract
This study investigates the determinants of bank liquidity in both Islamic and Conventional banks across 15 countries, focusing on key variables such as profitability, capital adequacy, bank size, and credit risk. Utilizing data from 107 Islamic banks and 506 Conventional banks spanning from 2013 to 2022, the analysis reveals significant differences in liquidity management between the two banking systems. The Random Effect Model (REM) was employed based on the Hausman test results to ensure robustness. The findings indicate that profitability negatively impacts liquidity in Islamic banks, likely due to investments in less liquid, Shariacompliant assets, while it positively influences liquidity in Conventional banks, where profits are often reinvested into liquid assets. Capital adequacy emerges as a crucial determinant of liquidity in both bank types, highlighting the importance of maintaining strong capital buffers. The study also finds that credit risk significantly reduces liquidity in Conventional banks, whereas it has a lesser impact on Islamic banks. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of liquidity management practices in Islamic and Conventional banks, offering valuable implications for bank managers, policymakers, and regulators.
Keywords
- Islamic Banks Search this journal for Islamic Banks (opens in a new tab)
- Conventional Banks Search this journal for Conventional Banks (opens in a new tab)
- Liquidity Search this journal for Liquidity (opens in a new tab)
- Shariah Compliance Search this journal for Shariah Compliance (opens in a new tab)
- Random Effect Model (REM) Search this journal for Random Effect Model (REM) (opens in a new tab)
References
- Achampong, A. (2022). Liquidity risk management and profitability: Evidence from listed banks in Ghana. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(2), 189-202.
- Al-Harbi, A. (2020). Determinants of Islamic banks' liquidity in OIC countries. Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 35(1), 15-30.
- Al-Homaidi, E. A., Tabash, M. I., Farhan, N. H. S., & Almaqtari, F. A. (2019). The determinants of liquidity of Indian listed commercial banks: A panel data approach. Cogent Economics & Finance, 7(1), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1616521
- Eljelly, A. M. A. (2004). Liquidity–profitability trade-off: An empirical investigation in an emerging market. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 14(2), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1108/10569210480000179
- Ghenimi, A., Chaibi, H., & Omri, M. A. B. (2021). Liquidity risk determinants: Islamic vs conventional banks. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2018-0060
- Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1109/emr.2005.26768
- Gorton, G., & Tallman, E. W. (2016). Too Big to Fail before the Fed. American Economic Review, 106(3), 523-527.
- Jedidia, K. B. (2020). Profit- and loss-sharing impact on Islamic bank liquidity in GCC countries. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(9), 1791–1806. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2018-0157
- Kwaku, J., & Mawutor, M. (2014). The failure of Lehman Brothers: Causes, preventive measures and recommendations. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(4), 85–91.
- Majeed, M. T., & Zainab, A. (2021). A comparative analysis of the financial performance of Islamic banks vis-à-vis conventional banks: Evidence from Pakistan. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 13(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-08-2018-0093
- Mokni, R. B., & Rachdi, H. (2014). Assessing the bank profitability in the MENA region: A comparative analysis between conventional and Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 5(2), 173-183.
- Moosa, I. (2010). The myth of too big to fail. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(3), 550-555.
- Moussa, M. A. (2015). The determinants of bank liquidity: Case of Tunisia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1), 249–259.
- Munteanu, I. (2012). Bank liquidity and its determinants in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 993-998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00263-8
- Vodová, P. (2019). Liquidity risk of banks in the Visegrad countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 39(2), 215-229.
Downloads
No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.
How to Cite
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohamad Nizam Jaafar, Mohammad Firdaus Mohammad Hatta, Amirul Afif Muhamat, Norzita Abdul Karim, Ummul Athirah Fathihah binti Mohd Idris, Nur Qurratuain Mardhiah binti Mohamad Zamri (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
Keywords
- Islamic Banks Search this journal for Islamic Banks (opens in a new tab)
- Conventional Banks Search this journal for Conventional Banks (opens in a new tab)
- Liquidity Search this journal for Liquidity (opens in a new tab)
- Shariah Compliance Search this journal for Shariah Compliance (opens in a new tab)
- Random Effect Model (REM) Search this journal for Random Effect Model (REM) (opens in a new tab)
Section
Published in
Vol. 16 No. 3S(I)a (2024)
Supply Chain Resilience, Islamic Finance & Micro-Influence
View issue contents
Published
Submissions
Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.
Make a Submission