Author

  • Mohamad Nizam Jaafar

    • Arshad Ayub Graduate Business School, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Mohammad Firdaus Mohammad Hatta

    • Arshad Ayub Graduate Business School, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Amirul Afif Muhamat

    • Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Norzita Abdul Karim

    • Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Ummul Athirah Fathihah binti Mohd Idris

    • Arshad Ayub Graduate Business School, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Nur Qurratuain Mardhiah binti Mohamad Zamri

    • Arshad Ayub Graduate Business School, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of bank liquidity in both Islamic and Conventional banks across 15 countries, focusing on key variables such as profitability, capital adequacy, bank size, and credit risk. Utilizing data from 107 Islamic banks and 506 Conventional banks spanning from 2013 to 2022, the analysis reveals significant differences in liquidity management between the two banking systems. The Random Effect Model (REM) was employed based on the Hausman test results to ensure robustness. The findings indicate that profitability negatively impacts liquidity in Islamic banks, likely due to investments in less liquid, Shariacompliant assets, while it positively influences liquidity in Conventional banks, where profits are often reinvested into liquid assets. Capital adequacy emerges as a crucial determinant of liquidity in both bank types, highlighting the importance of maintaining strong capital buffers. The study also finds that credit risk significantly reduces liquidity in Conventional banks, whereas it has a lesser impact on Islamic banks. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of liquidity management practices in Islamic and Conventional banks, offering valuable implications for bank managers, policymakers, and regulators.

Keywords

References

  • Achampong, A. (2022). Liquidity risk management and profitability: Evidence from listed banks in Ghana. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(2), 189-202.
  • Al-Harbi, A. (2020). Determinants of Islamic banks' liquidity in OIC countries. Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 35(1), 15-30.
  • Al-Homaidi, E. A., Tabash, M. I., Farhan, N. H. S., & Almaqtari, F. A. (2019). The determinants of liquidity of Indian listed commercial banks: A panel data approach. Cogent Economics & Finance, 7(1), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1616521
  • Eljelly, A. M. A. (2004). Liquidity–profitability trade-off: An empirical investigation in an emerging market. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 14(2), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1108/10569210480000179
  • Ghenimi, A., Chaibi, H., & Omri, M. A. B. (2021). Liquidity risk determinants: Islamic vs conventional banks. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2018-0060
  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1109/emr.2005.26768
  • Gorton, G., & Tallman, E. W. (2016). Too Big to Fail before the Fed. American Economic Review, 106(3), 523-527.
  • Jedidia, K. B. (2020). Profit- and loss-sharing impact on Islamic bank liquidity in GCC countries. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(9), 1791–1806. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2018-0157
  • Kwaku, J., & Mawutor, M. (2014). The failure of Lehman Brothers: Causes, preventive measures and recommendations. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(4), 85–91.
  • Majeed, M. T., & Zainab, A. (2021). A comparative analysis of the financial performance of Islamic banks vis-à-vis conventional banks: Evidence from Pakistan. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 13(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-08-2018-0093
  • Mokni, R. B., & Rachdi, H. (2014). Assessing the bank profitability in the MENA region: A comparative analysis between conventional and Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 5(2), 173-183.
  • Moosa, I. (2010). The myth of too big to fail. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(3), 550-555.
  • Moussa, M. A. (2015). The determinants of bank liquidity: Case of Tunisia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1), 249–259.
  • Munteanu, I. (2012). Bank liquidity and its determinants in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 993-998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00263-8
  • Vodová, P. (2019). Liquidity risk of banks in the Visegrad countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 39(2), 215-229.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Jaafar, M. N., Mohammad Hatta, M. F., Muhamat, A. A., Abdul Karim, N., binti Mohd Idris, U. A. F., & binti Mohamad Zamri, N. Q. M. (2024). The Determinants of Bank’s Liquidity: Comparative Analysis From Global Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks. Information Management and Business Review, 16(3S(I)a), 308-316. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i3S(I)a.4212

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2024-10-27

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission