Author

  • Zuraidah Ismail

    • Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Saliza Sulaiman

    • Department of Accounting, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Tuan Badrol Hisham Tuan Besar

    • Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Zaidi Mohd Aminuddin

    • Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Shahariah Asmuni

    • Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Noor Adwa Sulaiman

    • Department of Accounting, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Syarul Emi Abu Samah

    • Bahagian Pembangunan Ekonomi Komuniti, Kementerian Kemajuan Desa dan Wilayah, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

Increasing private-owned cars in Malaysia has, thus far, contributed to growing congestion, environmental pollution, and decreasing public transport utilization. Car ownership has become possible through economic growth, and convenience and status attached to cars triggered tendencies from shifting to public transit. This development contradicts investments in public transport and aggravates environmental problems. This paper examines the relationship between private car ownership and public transport usage in Malaysia from 2000 to 2022, concentrating on intercity bus services, KTM commuters, and light rail transit. The results indicate that with increased riders for intercity buses and KTM commuter services, car usage drops, while that of light rail may raise car ownership. The study emphasizes the need to upgrade intercity and KTM services to mitigate the pressures of car ownership and calls for further research into the role of light rail.

Keywords

References

  • Abdullah, A., Mohd Yusof, N., & Idris, I. (2019). Assessing the environmental impact of rail transport in Malaysia: A case study of KTM. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 12(1), 189-204.
  • Aftabuzzaman, M. (2023). The role of public transport in reducing urban traffic congestion: Insights from recent studies. Transport Reviews, 43(2), 211-229.
  • Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73-80.
  • Berger, J. (2008). Introduction to multiple regression analysis. Statistical Methods Journal, 12(1), 45-60.
  • Berggren, C. (2015). The top 10 benefits of public transportation. Smart Cities Dive. https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/
  • Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2012). Public transport and modes of transport in the United States: A review of the literature. Transport Reviews, 32(1), 63-85.
  • Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. L. (2011). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between land use and travel behavior: What can we learn from the California travel survey? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(2), 117-128.
  • Cervero, R. (2003). Road expansion, urban growth, and induced travel: A path analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), 145-163.
  • Cervero, R. (2013). Transport and land use: A study of the impact of light rail transit on car consumption. Transport Policy, 27, 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.12.005
  • Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2006). Which reduces vehicle travel more: Jobs-housing balance or retail-housing mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), 475-490.
  • Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2006). Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(4), 280-286.
  • Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Car travel, transit use, and commuter pain: A case study of the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Record, 1607(1), 1-7.
  • Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the built environment: A synthesis of empirical findings. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199-219.
  • Chen, L., & Green, R. (2024). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 167, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2024.07.012
  • Dargay, J. M., Gately, D., & Sommer, M. (2007). Vehicle ownership and income growth, worldwide: 1960–2030. Energy Journal, 28(4), 143-170.
  • Fravel, F. D. (2012). Understanding and addressing the demand for intercity bus services. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2274, 50-57.
  • Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2014). The role of high-speed rail in meeting future transport needs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 59, 1-4.
  • Hussain, N., & Zailani, S. (2017). Impact of public transport services on road traffic congestion: A study of KTM services in Klang Valley. Asian Journal of Transportation, 5(2), 35-50.
  • Imenda, S. (2014). Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks? Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi/Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 185.
  • Lee, K., & Koo, J. (2018). Integrating rail and bus services: Lessons from KTM’s integration with local transit. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 112, 64-75.
  • Levinson, D., & Krizek, K. J. (2013). The end of traffic and the future of transport. The Access Almanac.
  • Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022). The influence of smart commuting technologies on car consumption. Journal of Urban Mobility.
  • Lim, J., & Tan, S. (2022). Economic benefits of reduced car usage due to improved rail services: A Malaysian perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 46(3), 546-562.
  • Litman, T. (2015). Evaluating public transit benefits and costs: Best practices guidebook. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
  • Litman, T. (2019). Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
  • Litman, T. (2021). Evaluating public transportation health benefits. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
  • Mokhtarian, P. L., & Cao, X. (2008). Modeling the choice of travel mode for commuting: A comparison of alternative approaches. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(4), 831-849.
  • Mokhtarian, P. L., & Cao, X. (2008). Measure of the impact of intercity transport on car ownership and usage. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(6), 829-844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.001
  • Mouwen, A., & Rietveld, P. (2013). Does competitive tendering improve customer satisfaction with public transport? A case study for the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 51, 29-45.
  • Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press.
  • Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2010). Walking and cycling for healthy cities. Built Environment, 36(4), 391-414.
  • Rahman, M., Shamsuddin, S., & Idris, I. (2021). Assessing the impact of improved KTMB services on car usage patterns in Malaysia. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(2), 145-160.
  • Uyan?k, G., & Güler, N. (2013). A study on multiple linear regression analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 234-240.
  • Villegas, A. (2024). Descriptive analytics: Techniques and applications. Data Analysis Review, 29(1), 10-22.
  • Wong, D., Yap, J., & Lee, W. (2014). The effects of rail network expansion on car ownership and usage. Transport Policy, 34, 59-68.
  • Yusof, N., Abdullah, A., & Zainudin, M. (2020). Strategies for enhancing rail transit usage in Malaysia: A case study of KTMB. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 146(5), 04020032.
  • Zackoff, M. W., Real, F. J., Klein, M. D., Abramson, E. L., Li, S.-T. T., & Gusic, M. E. (2019). Enhancing educational scholarship through conceptual frameworks: A challenge and roadmap for medical educators. Academic Pediatrics, 19(2), 135–141.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Ismail, Z., Sulaiman, S., Tuan Besar, T. B. H., Mohd Aminuddin, Z., Asmuni, S., Sulaiman, N. A., & Abu Samah, S. E. (2024). Navigating Urban Mobility: The Relationship between Car Consumption and Public Transport Usage in Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 16(3S(I)a), 502-513. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i3S(I)a.4148

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Zuraidah Ismail, Saliza Sulaiman, Tuan Badrol Hisham Tuan Besar, Zaidi Mohd Aminuddin, Shahariah Asmuni, Noor Adwa Sulaiman, Syarul Emi Abu Samah (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 16 No. 3S(I)a (2024) Supply Chain Resilience, Islamic Finance & Micro-Influence View issue contents

Published

2024-10-27

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission