Abstract
This case analysis focuses on a community college program environment, which is challenged by low employee participation and engagement. The purpose of this writing is to describe an assessment and proposal for planned changed in this program based on the Burke-Litwin Model of Organizational Performance and Change (Burke, 2002). The outcome of the assessment and plan for change is a theoretically based strategy applicable to this organization and suggested for consideration by other organizations where the presenting problem (low engagement in this case) is a symptom of deeper and underlying issues related to employee morale and organizational culture. This example is submitted to promote practitioner reflection in any organization challenged by low employee engagement, participation, or involvement. The depiction of the case describes the problem, a review of alternative organizational models to address it, the selection of an appropriate model, and the plan of action, which was proposed, consisting of initiatives to address the issues at specific points within the organization.
Keywords
- Change Search this journal for Change (opens in a new tab)
- Planned Change Search this journal for Planned Change (opens in a new tab)
- Engagement Search this journal for Engagement (opens in a new tab)
- Involvement Search this journal for Involvement (opens in a new tab)
- Burke-Litwin Search this journal for Burke-Litwin (opens in a new tab)
References
- Bateman, T. & Snell, S. (2009). Management, 8th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Block, P. (1993). Stewardship: Choosing service over self-interest. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
- Burke, W. W. (2002). Organization change: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Clayson, T. (2004). New relationship needed as workplace loyalty fades. Materials Management and Distribution, 49(8), 85.
- Colvard, J. (2003). Managers vs. Leaders, taken from Govexec.com ( www.govexec.com/dailyfed/htm) on 6/04/2012.
- Dawson, K. (1999). Your work life is what you make it. The Journal for Quality and Participation , 22(1) 48-52. Ezzamel, M., Lilley, S. & Willmott, H. (1994). The new organization and the new managerial work. European Management Journal , 12(4) 454-61.
- Gardiner, P., (1999). Soaring to new heights with learning oriented companies. Journal of Workplace Learning , 11(7) 255.
- Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership. New York: Paulist Press.
- Hawley, J. (1993). Reawakening the spirit in work. New York: A Fireside Book.
- Kotter, J. P. (1990). What leaders really do? Harvard Business Review, 68, 103-111.
- Kouzes, J. & Pozner, B. (2007). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- McCabe, D. & Lewin, D. (1992). Employee voice: A human resource management perspective. California Management Review, 32(3), 112-123.
- Litwin, G. H. & Stringer, R. A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Maclagen, P. (1988). Management and morality: A developmental perspective. London: Sage.
- Nadler, D. & Tushman, M. (1977). A diagnostic model for organization behavior. In J. Hackman, E. Lawler III,
- and L. Porter (Eds.), Perspectives in behavior in organizations. (85-100). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- O’Toole, J. (1995). Leading change: The argument for values-based leadership. New York: Ballentine Books.
- Thomas, A. & MacDiarmid, A. (2004). Encouraging employee engagement. CMA Management , 78, 14-16.
- Tichy, N. M. (1983). Managing strategic change: Technical, political, and cultural dynamics . New York: Wiley. Wanous, J., Reichers, A. & Austin, J. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change. Group and Organization Management , 25, 132-154.
- Weisbord, M. (1976). Organizational diagnosis: Six planes to look for trouble with or without a theory. Group and Organization Studies , 1, 430-447.
Downloads
No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.
How to Cite
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Joyce B. Boone (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
Keywords
- Change Search this journal for Change (opens in a new tab)
- Planned Change Search this journal for Planned Change (opens in a new tab)
- Engagement Search this journal for Engagement (opens in a new tab)
- Involvement Search this journal for Involvement (opens in a new tab)
- Burke-Litwin Search this journal for Burke-Litwin (opens in a new tab)
Section
Published
Submissions
Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.
Make a Submission