Author

  • Raja Adzrin Raja Ahmad

    • Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Segamat, Johor, Malaysia
    • Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Nurul Azlin Azmi

    • Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Segamat, Johor, Malaysia
    • Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Nor Balkish Zakaria

    • Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

The underrepresentation of women on corporate boards remains a global concern. Malaysia has taken steps to address this issue through the Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (MCCG 2021), which recommends a minimum of 30% female directors on boards. However, as of April 2025, the percentage of women directors in Bursa Malaysia stood at only 28% across all PLCs, indicating a gap between policy recommendations and actual implementation. This study examines the impact of board gender diversity and independence on corporate sustainability performance (CSP), proxied by the total ESG score. Using data from Refinitiv Eikon, the study covers 1,028 firms listed on Bursa Malaysia's main and ACE markets between 2019 and 2024, resulting in 6,168 firm-year observations. After excluding firms with insufficient ESG data, the final sample comprises 936 firm-year observations. A fixed-effects model was employed to analyse the unbalanced panel data. The results reveal that board gender diversity and board independence significantly enhance CSP. Additionally, board independence strengthens the positive relationship between board gender diversity and CSP, demonstrating its moderating effect. Robustness checks confirm that board gender diversity similarly influences both the environmental and social pillars. The findings provide empirical evidence supporting the role of board gender diversity and independence in promoting corporate sustainability. These insights have practical implications for investors and policymakers, emphasising the need to prioritise gender-diverse board compositions as Asian markets increasingly focus on corporate governance reforms.

Keywords

References

  • Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(3), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-09-2019-0108
  • Amorelli, M. F., & García?Sánchez, I. M. (2021). Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 537-554. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2079
  • Arayssi, M., Dah, M., & Jizi, M. (2016). Women on boards, sustainability reporting and firm performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(3), 376-401.
  • Bannò, M., Filippi, E., & Trento, S. (2023). Women in top echelon positions and their effects on sustainability: a review, synthesis and future research agenda. Journal of management and governance, 27(1), 181-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09604-7
  • Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
  • Bennouri, M., Chtioui, T., Nagati, H., & Nekhili, M. (2018). Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters? Journal of Banking & Finance, 88, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.12.010
  • Birindelli, G., Chiappini, H., & Savioli, M. (2020). When do women on the board of directors reduce bank risk? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1307-1327. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2020-0089
  • Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta?analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12165
  • Carnini Pulino, S., Ciaburri, M., Magnanelli, B. S., & Nasta, L. (2022). Does ESG disclosure influence firm performance?. Sustainability, 14(13), 7595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137595
  • Chatterjee, C., & Nag, T. (2023). Do women on boards enhance firm performance? Evidence from top Indian companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 20(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-022-00153-5
  • Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: The moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102291
  • Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Tong, S., Jiraporn, N., & Proctor, R. (2020). How do independent directors view corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from a quasi?natural experiment. Financial Review, 55(4), 697-716. https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12244
  • Dang, R., Houanti, L. H., Sahut, J. M., & Simioni, M. (2021). Do women on corporate boards influence corporate social performance? A control function approach. Finance Research Letters, 39, https://doi.org/101645. 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101645
  • Dhir, A., Khan, S. J., Islam, N., Ractham, P., & Meenakshi, N. (2023). Drivers of sustainable business model innovations. An upper echelon theory perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 122409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122409
  • Dunn, P., & Sainty, B. (2009). The relationship among board of directors characteristics, corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(4), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130910987558
  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573
  • Frankl, M., & Roberts, S. (2018). Female executives in healthcare management in the context of the upper echelon theory. Journal of Business Diversity, 18(2). 98-112. https://doi.org/10.33423/jbd.v18i2.529
  • Galbreath, J. (2018). Is board gender diversity linked to financial performance? The mediating mechanism of CSR. Business & Society, 57(5), 863–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316647967
  • García?Sánchez, I. M., Martínez?Ferrero, J., & García?Benau, M. A. (2019). Integrated reporting: The mediating role of the board of directors and investor protection on managerial discretion in munificence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1659
  • Ginglinger, E., & Raskopf, C. (2023). Women directors and E&S performance: Evidence from board gender quotas. Journal of Corporate Finance, 83, 102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102496
  • Gurol, B. and Lagasio, V. (2023), "Women board members’ impact on ESG disclosure with the environment and social dimensions: evidence from the European banking sector", Social Responsibility Journal, 19 (1), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2020-0308
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). New York: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
  • Hillman, A. J., Cannella Jr, A. A., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747-763. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800
  • Hyun, E., Yang, D., Jung, H., & Hong, K. (2016). Women on boards and corporate social responsibility. Sustainability, 8(4), 300-326. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040300
  • Isidro, H., & Sobral, M. (2015). The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2302-9
  • Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1052-1
  • Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1492-2
  • Johanson, D., & Østergren, K. (2010). The movement toward independent directors on boards: A comparative analysis of Sweden and the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(6), 527-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00813.x
  • Kallamu, B. S. (2016). Ownership structure, independent directors and firm performance. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 3(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1453/jsas.v3i1.625
  • Kamaludin, K., Ibrahim, I., Sundarasen, S., & Faizal, O. V. A. (2022). ESG in the boardroom: Evidence from the Malaysian market. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 7(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-022-00072-2
  • Khan, M. A. (2022). ESG disclosure and firm performance: A bibliometric and meta-analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101668
  • Khunkaew, R., Wichianrak, J., & Suttipun, M. (2023). Sustainability reporting, gender diversity, firm value and corporate performance in the ASEAN region. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2200608. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2200608
  • Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2013). Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 17, 491-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9186-1
  • Makhija, H. & Raghukumari, P.S. & Sethiya, A. (2024). Does board gender diversity moderate the impact of ESG on firms' economic value added? Evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 74. 10.1108/IJPPM-12-2023-0664.
  • Mallin, C. A., & Michelon, G. (2011). Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: An empirical investigation of the US best corporate citizens. Accounting and Business Research, 41(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2011.550740
  • Maicsa. (2024). Women on boards in 2024. Maicsa.
  • MCCG. (2021). Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Securities Commission Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Muhammad, H., & Migliori, S. (2023). Effects of board gender diversity and sustainability committees on environmental performance: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(6), 1051-1076. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.8
  • Nadeem, M., Zaman, R., & Saleem, I. (2020). Boardroom gender diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence from Australian securities exchange-listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 119434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119434
  • Nashri, N. S., Ismail, R. F., Md Nor, H., & Aguilera-Caracual. J. (2023). Do Board Composition Attributes Lead to Better Environmental, Social and Governance Performance in Malaysia? Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance 20: 64–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/AJAG-2023-20-05
  • Naveed, M., Sohail, M. K., Abdin, S. Z., Awais, M., & Batool, N. (2020). Role of ESG disclosure in determining asset allocation decision: An individual investor perspective. Paradigms, 14(1), https://doi.org/157-165. 10.24312/193014024
  • Nazir Gardazi, S. S., Sheikh Hassan, A. F., Saidin, S. F., & Johari, J. B. (2023). Dynamic Relationship Between Board of Directors and Corporate Sustainability Performance: Evidence from the Energy Sector. International Journal of Economics & Management, 17(1). 19–35. http://doi.org/10.47836/ijeam.17.1.02
  • Newman, C., Rand, J., Tarp, F., & Trifkovic, N. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in a competitive business environment. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(8), 1455–1472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1694144
  • Nguyen, P., & Nguyen, A. (2015). The effect of corporate social responsibility on firm risk. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2013-0093
  • Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate governance: An international review, 18(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00784.x
  • Nielsen, V. L., & Madsen, M. B. (2017). Does gender diversity in the workplace affect job satisfaction and turnover intentions? International Public Management Review, 18(1), 77-115. http://journals.sfu.ca/ipmr/index.php/ipmr/article/view/318
  • Nishii, L. H., Gotte, A., & Raver, J. L. (2007). Upper echelon theory revisited: The relationship between upper echelon diversity, the adoption of diversity practices, and organizational performance. Working paper series. Working Paper 07 – 04, Cornell University. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/77344
  • Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations: New empirical insights from a Neo?Institutional framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 468-494. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12026
  • Ortas, E., Álvarez, I., & Zubeltzu, E. (2017). Firms’ board independence and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 9(6), 1006-1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061006
  • Paoloni, P., Lombardi, R., & Principale, S. (2023). The impact of gender diversity on corporate social responsibility knowledge: empirical analysis in the European context. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(9), 2484-2498. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2022-0512
  • Pareek, R., Sahu, T. N., & Gupta, A. (2023). Gender diversity and corporate sustainability performance: empirical evidence from India. Vilakshan-XIMB Journal of Management, 20(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-10-2020-0183
  • Park, S. R., & Jang, J. Y. (2021). The impact of ESG management on investment decision: Institutional investors’ perceptions of country-specific ESG criteria. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(3), 48-75. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9030048
  • Purbawangsa, I. B. A., Solimun, S., Fernandes, A. A. R., & Mangesti Rahayu, S. (2020). Corporate governance, corporate profitability, toward corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate value (comparative study in Indonesia, China and India stock exchanges in 2013-2016). Social Responsibility Journal, 16(7), 983-999. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2017-0160
  • Sahin, K., Basfirinci, C. S., & Ozsalih, A. (2011). The impact of board composition on corporate financial and social responsibility performance: Evidence from public-listed companies in Turkey. African Journal of Business Management, 5(7), 2959. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM
  • Securities Commission Malaysia. (2021). Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG). Retrieved from https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/corporate-governance/malaysian-code-on-corporate-governance
  • Shaikh, I. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practice and firm performance: An international evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.16202
  • Shakil, M. H., Munim, Z. H., Zamore, S., & Tasnia, M. (2024). Sustainability and financial performance of transport and logistics firms: Does board gender diversity matter? Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(1), https://doi.org/100-115. 10.1080/20430795.2022.2039998
  • Velte, P. (2016). Women on the management board and ESG performance. Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-01-2016-0001
  • Velte, P. (2017). Do women on the board of directors have an impact on corporate governance quality and firm performance? A literature review. International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management, 5(4), 302–346. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2017.10010121
  • Wan Mohammad, W. M., Zaini, R., & Md Kassim, A. A. (2023). Women on boards, firms’ competitive advantage and its effect on ESG disclosure in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(5), 930-948. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2021-0151
  • Wasiuzzaman, S., & Wan Mohammad, W. M. (2020). Board gender diversity and transparency of environmental, social and governance disclosure: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(1), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3099
  • Wong, S. L. (2024). The impact of female representation and ethnic diversity in committees on environmental, social and governance performance in Malaysia. Society and Business Review, 19(2), 207-229. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-02-2023-0052
  • Yadav, P., & Jain, A. (2023). Sustainability disclosures and corporate boards: a stakeholder approach to decision-making. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(5), 1027–1047. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2022-0279
  • Younas, N., Uddin, S., Awan, T., & Khan, M. Y. (2021). Corporate governance and financial distress: Asian emerging market perspective. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(4), 702-715. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2020-0119
  • Zaman, R., Jain, T., Samara, G., & Jamali, D. (2022). Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: Mapping the interface. Business & Society, 61(3), 690-752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320973415
  • Zawawi, M. M., Ismail, M., & Kamarudin, S. N. (2023). Gender Diversity and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) of Malaysian Listed Companies. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 13 (1), 933 – 941. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i1/15251
  • Zhang, Y., Khan, H. U. R., Lee, C. C., & Salik, M. (2022). Female directors and corporate sustainability performance: The moderating role of political connection. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(3), 3307–3325. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2327

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Raja Ahmad, R. A., Azmi, N. A., & Zakaria, N. B. (2025). Does Board Gender Diversity and Independent Drive Affect Corporate Sustainability Performance? Evidence from Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 17(3(I)S), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I)S.4641

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Raja Adzrin Raja Ahmad, Nurul Azlin Azmi, Nor Balkish Zakaria (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 17 No. 3(I)S (2025) Digital Leadership, AI-Assisted Learning & Inclusive Workforce View issue contents

Published

2025-10-14

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission