Author

  • Nur Syuhada Adnan

    • Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Terengganu, Kampus Dungun, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Syafiq Abdul Haris Halmi

    • Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Terengganu, Kampus Dungun, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Noor Emilina Mohd Nasir

    • Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Terengganu, Kampus Dungun, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Suraya Ahmad

    • Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Terengganu, Kampus Dungun, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Muhammad Shaqif Azfar Afandi

    • Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Terengganu, Kampus Dungun, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the intellectual landscape and thematic evolution of neuroaccounting, an emerging interdisciplinary field that integrates neuroscience, psychology, behavioral finance, and accounting to understand financial decision-making. Despite its conceptual relevance, neuroaccounting remains underrepresented in scholarly indexing and lacks a systematic bibliometric synthesis. Using a bibliometric analysis of 482 documents published between 1980 and 2025, this study investigates publication trends, citation metrics, document types, keyword patterns, and journal contributions. The research sample includes peer-reviewed articles, book chapters, conference papers, and other scholarly outputs indexed across major academic databases. Findings reveal a steady increase in academic interest, with notable growth in publications and citations from 2018 onward. Core themes such as cognitive biases, heuristics, behavioral finance, and investment decisions dominate the literature, even though “neuroaccounting” is not yet a mainstream keyword. High-impact contributions often originate from decision science and strategy journals, while behavioral finance journals serve as primary publication venues. Network and density visualizations highlight tightly connected thematic clusters centered on decision-making under uncertainty. The study’s implications suggest that neuroaccounting is conceptually robust but still fragmented, requiring further empirical research in real-world settings and broader geographic representation. Limitations include citation lag in recent publications and the evolving terminology surrounding the field. This paper contributes by positioning neuroaccounting as a unifying label that bridges established research domains, offering a foundation for future interdisciplinary collaboration and methodological innovation in accounting and financial behavior research.

Keywords

References

  • Ahmad Z. A. (2010). Brain in business: the economics of neuroscience. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 17(2), 1–3.
  • Ahmi, A. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis using biblioMagika® Second Edition. Academic Research Society of Malaysia.
  • Ahmi, A. (2025). Ultimate Guide to Bibliometric Analysis with VOSviewer. First Edition. Academic Research Society of Malaysia.
  • Alam, M. R., Ahmad, A., Akhter, J., & Aziz, T. (2025). Mapping the field of behavioral finance: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Asian Education and Development Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2024-0162
  • Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9–64. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051053737843
  • Chen, Y., Presslee, A., & Yang, S. (2025). The effect of functional diversity on team creativity: Behavioral and fNIRS evidence. Management Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02157
  • Co?kun, A., & Karakoç, M. (2020). A Conceptual Framework for Behavioral Accounting. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-095-220201007
  • Dickhaut, J., Basu, S., McCabe, K., & Waymire, G. (2010). Neuroaccounting: Consilience between the biologically evolved brain and culturally evolved accounting principles. Accounting Horizons, 24(2), 221–255. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.2.221
  • Gallese, V., Mastrogiorgio, A., Petracca, E., & Viale, R. (2021). Embodied bounded rationality. In R. Viale (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Bounded Rationality (pp. 377–390). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315658353-27
  • Glimcher, P. W., & Fehr, E. (Eds.). (2013). Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (2nd ed.). Academic Press
  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
  • Guo, L., Cheng, J., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Mapping the knowledge domain of financial decision making: A scientometric and bibliometric study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1006412. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1006412
  • Krämer, W. (2014). Kahneman, D. (2011): Thinking, fast and slow [Review of the book Thinking, fast and slow, by D. Kahneman]. Statistical Papers, 55(3), 915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-013-0533-y
  • Kumar, G., & Choudhary, K. (2023). Behavioral finance: A review of major research themes and bibliometric analysis. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 16(32), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17015/ejbe.2023.032.01
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 339(jul21 1), b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
  • Ortiz-Terán, E., Díez, I., Sepulcre, J., López-Pascual, J., & Ortiz, T. (2021). Connectivity adaptations in dopaminergic systems define the brain maturity of investors. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 11671. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91227-x
  • Rotaru, K., Rose, J. M., Ganbold, O., Rose, A. M., Loveridge, J., & Stamatelatos, A. (2024). Neuroaccounting: Integrating neurophysiological techniques into accounting and accounting information systems research. Journal of Information Systems. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2308/ISYS-2023-061
  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  • Tank, A. K., & Farrell, A. M. (2022). Is neuroaccounting taking a place on the stage? A review of the influence of neuroscience on accounting research. European Accounting Review, 31(1), 173–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1866634
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  • Zakaria, R., Ahmi, A., Ahmad, A. H., Othman, Z., Azman, K. F., Ab Aziz, C. B., Ismail, C. A. N., & Shafin, N. (2021). Visualizing and mapping a decade of literature on honey research: a bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2020. Journal of Apicultural Research, 60(3), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2021.1898789

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Adnan, N. S., Halmi, S. A. H., Mohd Nasir, N. E., Ahmad, S., & Afandi, M. S. A. (2025). The Emergence of Neuroaccounting: A Bibliometric Analysis of Financial Decision-Making Research. Information Management and Business Review, 17(3(I)S), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I)S.4757

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Syuhada Adnan, Syafiq Abdul Haris Halmi, Noor Emilina Mohd Nasir, Suraya Ahmad, Muhammad Shaqif Azfar Afandi (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 17 No. 3(I)S (2025) Digital Leadership, AI-Assisted Learning & Inclusive Workforce View issue contents

Published

2025-10-14

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission