Social Capabilities and Corporate Zakat Commitment: Evidence from Mission-Driven and Stakeholder Management Perspectives

Nurul Fatma Aziz; Zuraina Sal Sabila Mohamed; Muhsin Nor Paizin; Muhammad Kamil Husain

doi:10.22610/imbr.v18i1(J).4789

Author

Nurul Fatma Aziz
- Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
- Malaysia
Zuraina Sal Sabila Mohamed
- Multimedia University, Malaysia
- Malaysia
Muhsin Nor Paizin
- Pusat Pungutan Zakat Wilayah Persekutuan (PPZWP), Malaysia
- Malaysia
Muhammad Kamil Husain
- Universiti Serang Raya, Malaysia
- Malaysia

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of social capabilities on corporate zakat commitment, drawing on the Social Resource-Based View (SRBV) framework. While corporate zakat represents an important Islamic social finance mechanism, its implementation remains largely voluntary, resulting in inconsistent participation among firms. This study focuses on two key dimensions of social capabilities, mission-driven capabilities and stakeholder management capabilities, to explain variations in corporate zakat commitment among zakat-paying companies in Malaysia. Using survey data collected from the senior management of 142 corporate Zakat payers, the study applies partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to test the proposed relationships. The findings indicate that stakeholder management capabilities have a significant positive effect on corporate zakat commitment, whereas mission-driven capabilities do not exhibit a statistically significant influence. These results suggest that effective stakeholder engagement, communication, and accountability mechanisms are more critical to motivating corporate Zakat practices than the formal inclusion of Zakat within organisational mission statements. The study contributes to accounting and Islamic governance literature by providing empirical evidence on the role of social capabilities in shaping voluntary zakat commitment. From a practical perspective, the findings highlight the importance of stakeholder-oriented governance strategies for zakat institutions, regulators, and corporations seeking to enhance zakat compliance and reporting practices.

Keywords

References

Andriani, A., & Mairijani, M. (2019). Strengthening corporate zakat policy in Indonesia. Iqtishadia: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 12(1), 58-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/iqtishadia.v12i1.2718
Ahmadi, G., Noorzai, E., & Hijran, N. (2023). Conditions of the owner in the duty of Zakat. Spring Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 2(02), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.55559/sjaes.v2i02.40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55559/sjaes.v2i02.40
Alfakhri, Y., Nurunnabi, M., & Alfakhri, D. (2018). Young Saudi consumers and corporate social responsibility: an Islamic “CSR tree” model. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(12), 1570–1589. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-09-2017-0395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-09-2017-0395
Al-Samman, E., & Al-Nashmi, M. M. (2016). Effect of corporate social responsibility on nonfinancial organizational performance: Evidence from Yemeni for-profit public and private enterprises. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2015-0049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2015-0049
Alshorman, S., Qaderi, S., Alhmoud, T., & Meqbel, R. (2022). The role of slack resources in explaining the relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and firm market value: a case from an emerging market. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, September, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2119833 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2119833
Amly, W. S. (2020). Kerajaan harap kutipan zakat syarikat meningkat - Dr Zulkifli.
Anser, M.K., Yousaf, Z., Majid, A. & Yasir, M. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility commitment and participation predict environmental and social performance? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(6): 2578–2587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1977
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30040690
Arco-Castro, M. L., López-Pérez, M. V., Rodríguez-Gómez, S., & Garde-Sánchez, R. (2020). Do stakeholders modulate philanthropic strategy? Corporate philanthropy as stakeholders’ engagement. Sustainability, 12(18), 7242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187242
Bacinello, E., Tontini, G., & Alberton, A. (2020). Influence of maturity on corporate social responsibility and sustainable innovation in business performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1841
Bacq, S., & Eddleston, K. A. (2018). A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441
Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current directions in psychological science, 1(3), 98-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
Dare, J. (2016). Will the truth set us free? An exploration of CSR motive and commitment. Business and Society Review 121(1): 85–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12082
Bakar, F.A. & Yusof, M.A.M. (2014). CSR practices at Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad (BIMB): Managing CSR fund. Issues In Social and Environmental Accounting 8(1): 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22164/isea.v8i1.87
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. International Business Strategy: Theory and Practice, 17, 283–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bhattacharyya, S. S. (2020). Development of an international corporate social responsibility framework and typology. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(5), 719–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2018-0094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2018-0094
Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Is philanthropy strategic? An analysis of the management of charitable giving in large UK companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(3), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00446.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00446.x
Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z
Buchholtz, A. K., Amason, A. C., & Rutherford, M. A. (1999). Beyond resources: The mediating effect of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Business & Society, 38(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800203
Cristina De Stefano, M., Montes-Sancho, M. J., & Busch, T. (2016). A natural resource-based view of climate change: Innovation challenges in the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1436–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.023
Dee, G.-V. (2016). Mission Statement, Stakeholders, Values, and Global Firm Performance : A Quantitative Study Dissertation Manuscript Submitted to Northcentral University Graduate Faculty of the School of Business in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree. February.
Donnelly, T., & Wickham, M. (2020). Exploring the antecedent resources and capabilities of strategic corporate social responsibility. Social Responsibility Journal, August. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2018-0334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2018-0334
Flota Rosado, J. A., & Ocampo Figueroa, L. E. (2016). The Social Rewards for Mission-Driven Business: An Integrative Approach. Global Journal of Business Research, 10(4), 55–65.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder. Marshall, Pitman.
Freeman, R. E., & Dmytriyev, S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 7. https://doi.org/10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev DOI: https://doi.org/10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev
Gao, S. S., & Zhang, J. J. (2006). Stakeholder engagement, social auditing and corporate sustainability. Business Process Management Journal, 12(6), 722–740. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610710891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610710891
Grant, A. M., & Sumanth, J. J. (2009). Mission Possible? The Performance of Prosocially Motivated Employees Depends on Manager Trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014391
Grant, R. M. (1999). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. Knowledge and Strategy, December 1999, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-7088-3.50004-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7088-3.50004-8
Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
Halme, M. & Laurila, J. (2009). Philanthropy, integration or innovation? Exploring the financial and societal outcomes of different types of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 84: 325–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9712-5
Hafez, H. M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical study on Egyptian banks. Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(2), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i2p9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i2p9
Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.2307/256971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256971
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Manag. Rev., 20(4), 986–1014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258963
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
Hasan, M. M., & Habib, A. (2017). Corporate life cycle, organizational financial resources and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 13(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2017.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2017.01.002
He, W., & Shen, R. (2019). ISO 14001 Certification and Corporate Technological Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3712-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3712-2
Hoque, N., Uddin, M. R., Ibrahim, M., & Mamun, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibilities (CSR) as a means of materializing corporate vision: A Volvo Group approach. Asian Social Science, 10(11), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n11p258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n11p258
Ibrahim, S. M., & Sheriff Muhammad Ibrahim. (2015). Exploring the Motivational Factors for Corporate Zakat Payments. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 3(1), 429–436.
Ifada, L. M., Ghozali, I., & Faisal, F. (2019). Islamic organizational culture, Islamic corporate social responsibility, and corporate performance: Evidence from Sharia Bank in Indonesia. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(6), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n6p118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n6p118
Jamali, D. (2014). CSR in Developing Countries through an Institutional Lens, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Sustainability: Emerging Trends in Developing Economies (Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance, and Sustainability). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-905920140000008005
Jenkins, B., & Fries, L. (2012). Project Nurture: Partnering for Business Opportunity and Development Impact.
Kao, E. H., Yeh, C. C., Wang, L. H., & Fung, H. G. (2018). The relationship between CSR and performance: Evidence in China. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 51(June 2016), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.04.006
Klassen, R. D., & Vereecke, A. (2012). Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.021
Lashitew, A. A., Bals, L., & van Tulder, R. (2020). Inclusive Business at the Base of the Pyramid: The Role of Embeddedness for Enabling Social Innovations. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 421–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3995-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3995-y
Lin, W. L., Ho, J. A., Ng, S. I., & Lee, C. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility lead to improved firm performance? The hidden role of financial slack. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(7), 957–982. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2018-0259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2018-0259
M. Kabir Hassan & Mahlknecht, M. (2011a). Islamic capital markets. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119206040
M. Kabir Hassan & Mahlknecht, M. (2011b). Islamic capital markets. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119206040
Mallin, C., Farag, H., & Ow-Yong, K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Islamic banks. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 103(March 2013), S21–S38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.001
Mattingly, J. E., & Olsen, L. (2018). Performance Outcomes of Investing Slack Resources in Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 25(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818762336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818762336
Migdad, A. (2019). Managing Zakat Through Institutions: Case of Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 28–44. https://doi.org/10.25272/ijisef.519228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25272/ijisef.519228
Mohammed, M. O., Tarique, K. M., & Islam, R. (2015). Measuring the performance of Islamic banks using a maqasid-based model. Intellectual Discourse, 23, 401–424.
Noor, R., Mohd, N., Nik, N., Rashid, M., & Mastuki, N. (2017). Zakat And Tax Reporting : Disclosures Practices of Shariah Compliance Companies. October. https://doi.org/10.1109/CHUSER.2011.6163862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CHUSER.2011.6163862
Nwoba, A.C., Boso, N. & Robson, M.J. (2020). Corporate sustainability strategies in institutional adversity: Antecedent, outcome, and contingency effects. Business Strategy and the Environment 30(2): 787–807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2654
Nurunnabi, M., Alfakhri, Y. & Alfakhri, D.H. (2019). CSR in Saudi Arabia and Carroll’s Pyramid: What is ‘known’ and ‘unknown’? Journal of Marketing Communications 26(1): 874–895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2019.1604560
Obaidullah, M. (2016). Revisiting estimation methods of business zakat and related tax incentives. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 7(4), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2014-0035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2014-0035
Pan, X., Sinha, P., & Chen, X. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and eco-innovation : The triple bottom line perspective. August 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2043
Platonova, E., Asutay, M., Dixon, R., & Mohammad, S. (2018). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Financial Performance: Evidence from the GCC Islamic Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3229-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3229-0
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December, 1–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33247-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33247-2
Rashid, M. (2017). Reporting of zakat and charitable activities in Islamic banks: theory and practice in a multi- cultural setting. Handbook of Empirical Research on Islam and Economic Life, October 2020, 163–192. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710736.00015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710736.00015
Rettab, B., Brik, A. Ben, & Mellahi, K. (2009). A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational performance in emerging economies: The case of Dubai. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0005-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0005-9
Rosman, R., Haron, R. & Othman, N.B.M. (2019). The impact of zakat contribution on the financial performance of Islamic banks in Malaysia. Al-Shajarah 2019 (Special Issue Islamic Banking and Finance), 1–21.
Sharif, N., & Wahid, H. (2019). Aplikasi Konsep Wakalah Dalam Pembayaran Zakat Simpanan: Kajian Di Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad (BIMB): An Application of Wakalah Concept In Payment of Zakat for Saving: A Study at Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad (BIMB). Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 17(2), 333-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol0no0.289
Sarif, S. M., & Zainudin, D. (2020). Influence of Zakat on Sejahtera Strategic Position and Action. International Conference of Zakat, 255–264. https://doi.org/10.37706/iconz.2020.243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37706/iconz.2020.243
Sharma, S., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2007). The contingent influence of organizational capabilities on proactive environmental strategy in the service sector: An analysis of North American and European ski resorts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24(4), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.35
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::aid-smj967>3.3.co;2-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::AID-SMJ967>3.0.CO;2-4
Sheriff, M. I. (2014). Review of the Contemporary Zakat Collection Systems from the Islamic Economic Policies. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 5(3), 49–53.
Sinthupundaja, J., Chiadamrong, N., Kohda, Y., & Thajchayapong, S. (2020). Influence of intra- and inter-organizational relationships on CSR and their impact on a hospital’s financial performance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 14(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2020.104703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2020.104703
Sinthupundaja, J., Kohda, Y., & Chiadamrong, N. (2020). Examining Capabilities of Social Entrepreneurship for Shared Value Creation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1543726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1543726
Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement Strategy Moderates the CSR-Financial Performance Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274–1303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01068.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01068.x
Tate, W. L., & Bals, L. (2018). Achieving Shared Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Value Creation: Toward a Social Resource-Based View (SRBV) of the Firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 803–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3344-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3344-y
Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2020). Zakat and social capital: thoughts on modernism, postmodernism, and faith. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 00(00), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2020.1841673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2020.1841673
Torugsa, N. A., O’Donohue, W., & Hecker, R. (2013). Proactive CSR: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of its Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions on the Association between Capabilities and Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(2), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1405-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1405-4
Vitale, G., Cupertino, S., & Taticchi, P. (2023). Analyzing the role of available organizational slack resources in affecting environmental performance. A structural equation modelling approach. Measuring Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-09-2022-0110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-09-2022-0110
Wickham, M., & Wong, T. (2009). Stakeholder management capability: Exploring the strategic management of dissenting stakeholder groups. Corporate Ownership and Control, 6(4 C CONT. 2), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i4c2p3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i4c2p3
Yoon, B., & Chung, Y. (2018). The effects of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 37(October), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.10.005
Yusof, M., Mohd Nor, L., & Edward Hoopes, J. (2014). Virtuous CSR: an Islamic family business in Malaysia. Journal of Family Business Management, 4(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-07-2013-0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-07-2013-0016
Zhang, Y., & Ouyang, Z. (2021). Doing well by doing good: How corporate environmental responsibility influences corporate financial performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2031

Downloads

Full-text downloads recorded for this article, by month.

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Aziz, N. F., Mohamed, Z. S. S., Nor Paizin, M., & Husain, M. K. (2026). Social Capabilities and Corporate Zakat Commitment: Evidence from Mission-Driven and Stakeholder Management Perspectives. Information Management and Business Review, 18(1(I), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v18i1(J).4789

Share this article

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Social Capabilities and Corporate Zakat Commitment: Evidence from Mission-Driven and Stakeholder Management Perspectives

Download the full text

Author

Abstract

Keywords

References

Downloads

How to Cite

Share this article

License

Keywords

Section

Published in

Published

Submissions