Abstract
Pakistani consumers must be well informed that, in achieving their corporate goals, organizations now bear greater responsibility to develop healthy environment and aware society. This study aims towards assessment of the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior in Pakistan and to analyze whether consumers reckon Organization’s CSR initiative before buying decisions of goods and services. Carroll definition of CSR was adopted here that addresses whole range of economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic responsibilities. A Survey Questionnaire in this regard was carried out and 313 responses were collected across the different corners of Pakistan that further lead to culmination of this analysis report. The analysis showed that there is significant positive correlation between all CSR components and consumer behavior. However, Pakistani consumer’s priority appeared to be different than offered by Carroll’s Classical Pyramid, where economic responsibility was considered to be the greatest priority, followed by philanthropic, legal & ethical responsibilities.
Keywords
- Carroll’s Pyramid Search this journal for Carroll’s Pyramid (opens in a new tab)
- Corporate Social Responsibility Search this journal for Corporate Social Responsibility (opens in a new tab)
- Consumer Behavior Search this journal for Consumer Behavior (opens in a new tab)
- Pakistan Search this journal for Pakistan (opens in a new tab)
References
- Ahmad, S. J. (2006). From Principles to Practice: Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility in Pakistan. Journal of Corporate Citizenship , 24, 115-29.
- Ali, I., Rehman, K., Yilmaz, A., Nazir, S. & Ali, J. (2010). Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Retention in Cellular industry of Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management , 4(4), 475-485.
- Amaeshi, K., Adi, B., Ogbechie, C. & Amao, O. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Nigeria: Western Mimicry or Indigenous Practices? ICCSR Research Paper Series (Nottingham: ICCSR).
- Andreasen, A. & Drumwright, M. (2001). Alliances and ethics in social marketing. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Arora, B. & Puranik, R. (2004). A Review of Corporate Social Responsibility in India. Development , 47(3), 93-100.
- Belal, A. R. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Developing Countries: The Case of Bangladesh. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Black, L. D. (2001). Towards understanding corporate social responsibility in Australia Paper presented at the Conference on Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, Retrieved 3 December 2012 from http://www.aph.gov.au.
- Bowen, H. (1953). Social Responsibility of the Businessman. New York : Harper.
- Brown, T. J. & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing , 61(1), 68–84.
- Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review , 4(4), 497–505.
- Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organisational stakeholders [Electronic version]. Business Horizons, July–August, 39–47.
- Christensen, J. & Murphy, R. (2004). The Social Irresponsibility of Corporate Tax Avoidance: Taking CSR to the bottom line. Development , 47(3), 37-44.
- Commission of European communities. (2001). Green Paper- Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility,COM (2001) 366 final. Brussels.
- Crane, A. & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
- Creyer, E. H. & Ross, W. T. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing , 14(6), 421–432.
- Davis, K. (1960). Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibility? California Management Review , 2, 70-76.
- Dusuki, A. W. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility of Islamic Banks in Malaysia: A Synthesis of Islamic and Stakeholders Perspective. PhD Thesis. Loughborough University, UK.
- Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J. & Mohr, L. A. (2000). Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix? Journal of Retailing , 76(3), 393–406.
- Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Business ethics and customer stakeholders. The Academy of Management Executive , 18(2), 126–129.
- Flack, O. & Heblich, S. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing Well by Doing Good. Business Horizons , 50, 247-254.
- Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A. & Barnett, M. L. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review , 105, 85–106.
- Frederick, W. C. (1960). The Growing Concern over Business Responsibility. California Management Review , 2, 54-61.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
- Garriga, E. & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics , 53(1/2), 51-71.
- Goddard, T. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Creating social capacity in developing countries. Development in Practice , 15, 433-438.
- Harrison, J. S. & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. The Academy of Management Journal , 42(5), 479–485.
- Huck, S. & Cormier, W. (1996). Readin statistics and Research. Harper Collins Publishers Inc.
- Lafferty, B., Barbara, A. & Ronald, E. G. (1999). Corporate credibility's role in consumers' attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research , 44(2), 45–72.
- Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics , 30(10), 57-72.
- Maignan, I. & Farrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 32(1), 3–19.
- Masaka, D. (2008). Why enforcing corporate social responsibility (CSR) is morally questionable. Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies , 13(1), 13-21.
- Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J. & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs , 35(1), 45–72.
- Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R. & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of StakeholderIdentification andSalience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review , 22, 853– 886.
- Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Rahim, R. A., Jalaludin, F. W. & Tajuddin, K. (2011). The importance of Corporate Social responsibility on conusmer behavior in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal , 16(1), 119–139.
- Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinant of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: AnApplication of Stakeholder Theory. Accounting Organizations and Society , 17(6), 595-612.
- Saleh, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility disclosure in an emerging market: A longitudinal analysis approach. International Business Research , 2(1), 131–141.
- Sen, S. & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research , 38, 225–243.
- Solomon, R. C. (1994). The New World of Business: Ethics and Free Enterprise in the Global 1990s . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
- Visser, W. (2005). Revisiting Carroll's CSR pyramid: An African perspective. In M. Huniche & E. R. Pedersen (Eds.). Corporate citizenship in developing countries: New partnership perspectives, (pp. 29–56). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
- Walton, C. C. (1967). Corporate Social Responsibilities. California: Wadsworth.
- Windsor, D. (2001). The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Organizational Analysis , 9(3), 225 - 256.
Downloads
No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.
How to Cite
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Adnan Safi, Muhammad Ismail Ramay (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
Keywords
- Carroll’s Pyramid Search this journal for Carroll’s Pyramid (opens in a new tab)
- Corporate Social Responsibility Search this journal for Corporate Social Responsibility (opens in a new tab)
- Consumer Behavior Search this journal for Consumer Behavior (opens in a new tab)
- Pakistan Search this journal for Pakistan (opens in a new tab)
Section
Published
Submissions
Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.
Make a Submission