Author

  • Hasna Fadhila

    • Institute Management Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia
    • Indonesia
  • Nora Amelda Rizal

    • Institute Management Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia
    • Indonesia

Abstract

Value at Risk (VaR) is a tool to predict the greater loss less than the certain confidence level over a period of time. Value at Risk Historical Simulation produce reliable value of VaR because of the historical data and measure the skewness of the observe data. So, Value at Risk well used by investors to determine the risk to be faced on their investment. To calculate VAR it is better to use maximum likelihood, which has been considered for estimating from historical data and also available for estimating nonlinear model. It is also a mathematic function that can approximate return. From the maximum likelihood function with normal distribution, we can draw the normal curve at one tail test. This research conducted to calculate Value at Risk using maximum likelihood. The normal curve will be compared with data return at each bank (Bank Mandiri, Bank BRI and Bank BNI). Empirical results demonstrated that Bank BNI in 2009, Bank BRI in 2010 and Bank BNI in 2011, had less value of VaR by historical simulation in each year. It is concluded that by using maximum likelihood method in the estimation of VaR, has certain appropriates compared with the normal curve.

Keywords

References

  • Bank Indonesia. (2010). Global crisis and rescue Indonesian banking system. Retrieved 8 October 2012 from http://www.bi.go.id/NR/rdonlyres/24C9500A-C0Cf 4BB3954DD2997AD865B3/18659/krisisglobaldampenyelamatansistemperbankanindonesia.pdf.
  • Christoffersen, P., Hahn, J. & Inoue, A. (2001). Testing And Comparing Value-At-Risk Measures. CIRANO, 1-18.
  • Danielsson, J. (2011). Financial Risk Forecasting (1st ed). Wiley.
  • Hull, J. C. (2012). Option, Futures, and Other Derivatives (8th ed). Pearson.
  • Jorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk (3rd ed). McGraw-Hill.
  • Krause, A. (2003). Exploring the limitations of value at risk: how good is it in practice? . The Journal Of Risk Finance , 2, 19-27.
  • Sartono, R. A. & Setiawan, A. A. (2006). Var optimal portfolio: a comparison between markowitz method and mean absolute deviation. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 11, 37-50.
  • Stambaugh, F. (1996). Risk and Value at Risk . European Management Journal , 14, 612-621.
  • Surya, Y. & Situngkir, H. (2006). Value at risk that takes into account the statistical properties of the return distribution. Munich personal RePEc Archive , 5, 895, 1-10.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Fadhila, H., & Rizal, N. A. (2013). Analysis of Risk using Value at Risk (VaR) After Crisis in 2008 Study in Stocks of Bank Mandiri, Bank BRI and Bank BNI in 2009-2011. Information Management and Business Review, 5(8), 394-400. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v5i8.1067

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2013-08-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission