Author

  • Budi Harsanto

    • University of Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
    • Indonesia

Abstract

Internet has influences numerous aspects in our life, including our learning process. Interest in the internet as a media to enhance learning experience in education operations has increased over the last decade. The recent web era termed as web 2.0. In web 2.0 era, users have the convenience to design their own website without need of learning complicated programming language. Combination between offline and online learning is known as blended learning. Innovations related with blended learning are emerging. The purposes of this paper are to elaborate the features of Google Sites that are useful for blended learning and to share users experiences from utilize Google Sites as tools of blended learning program at Faculty of Economics and Business University of Padjadjaran (FEB Unpad), Bandung, Indonesia. Users are often inhibited in creating or maintaining a website because of the complexity challenge. Google Sites, known for its tag line“create, collect and control”, offers ease of use in this regard. Faculty member and student can use this tool to interact. Users experience survey was conducted involving 84 users (78 students and 6 faculty members) to elaborate response of users, both faculty members and students. Results suggest that highest agreement rate was attained that Google site is helpful in share information. The lowest aggrement rate was found in “Google site useful for online discussion”.

Keywords

References

  • Alexander, S. & McKenzie, J. (1998). An Evaluation of IT Projects for University Learning. Cambridge Dictionary Online. (2011). Cambridge University Press. Retrieved October 14, 2012, from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/e-learning
  • Driscoll, M. (2002). Web-based Training: creating e-learning experiences (2nd Ed.). San Fransisco: JosseyBass/Pfeiffer.
  • Garrison, D. R. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century a framework for research and practice. Routledge.
  • Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E. & Smrikarov, A. (2004). M-Learning - a New Stage of Е -Learning, 1–5.
  • Govindasamy, T. (2002). Successful implementation of e-Learning. Pedagogical considerations , 4, 287– 299.
  • Gribin, A. (2011). A Brief History of The Internet. New Statesman, 30.
  • Gunasekaran, A., McNeil, R. D. & Shaul, D. (2002). E-learning: research and applications. Industrial and Commercial Training , 34(2), 44–53. doi: 10.1108/00197850210417528
  • Handal, B., Groenlund, C. & Gerzina, T. (2010). Dentistry students’ perceptions of learning management systems. European Journal of Dental Education : Official Journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe , 14(1), 50–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2009.00591.x
  • Hartley, D. E. (2001). Selling E-Learning. Alexandria: American Society for Training & Development.
  • Johnstone, D. B. (1993). Learning Productivity: A New Imperative for American Higher Education. Studies in Public Higher Education , 3(37).
  • Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education , 48, 185–204. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004
  • Macpherson, A., Elliot, M., Harris, I. & Homan, G. (2004). E-learning: reflections and evaluation of corporate programmes. Human Resource Development International , 7(3), 295–313. doi: 10.1080/13678860310001630638
  • Mayer, R. E. (2003). Elements of a Science of E-Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research , 29(3), 297–313. doi: 10.2190/YJLG-09F9-XKAX-753D
  • Moeller, S., Spitzer, K. & Spreckelsen, C. (2010). How to configure blended problem based learning-results of a randomized trial. Medical Teacher , 32(8), e328–46. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.490860
  • Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Sabino, F. M. R. & Zhou, L. (2011). Enhancing e-learning experience with online social networks. IET Communications , 5(8), 1147. doi: 10.1049/iet-com.2010.0409
  • Wahono, R. S. (2008). Meluruskan Salah Kaprah Tentang E-Learning. Retrieved October 14, 2012, from http://romisatriawahono.net/2008/01/23/meluruskan-salah-kaprah-tentang-e-learning/
  • Woods, R., Baker, J. D. & Hopper, D. (2004). Hybrid structures: Faculty use and perception of webbasedcourseware as asupplement to face-to-faceinstruction. The Internet and Higher Education , 7(4th Quarter), 281–297.
  • Yueh, H. P. & Hsu, S. (2008). Designing a learning management system to support instruction. Communications of the ACM , 51(4), 59–64.
  • Zhang, D. (2003). Powering E-Learning In the New Millennium : An Overview of E-Learning and Enabling Technology.
  • Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2004). Can E-Learning Replace Classroom Learning? Communications of the ACM , 47 (5), 74–79.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Harsanto, B. (2014). Innovation to Enhance Blended Learning Experience: Applying Google Sites in Higher Education. Information Management and Business Review, 6(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v6i1.1097

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2014-02-28

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission