Author

  • Fazal ur Rehman

    • COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock Campus, Pakistan
    • Pakistan
  • Farwida Javed

    • COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock Campus, Pakistan
    • Pakistan
  • Tariq Nawaz

    • COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock Campus, Pakistan
    • Pakistan
  • Ishfaq Ahmed

    • COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock Campus, Pakistan
    • Pakistan
  • Shabir Hyder

    • COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock Campus, Pakistan
    • Pakistan

Abstract

The study emphasized on the role of hierarchy of effects model in advertisement and reviewed its historical background along with different phases. This study clarified the early development phase, modern development phase, some challenges and defenses, and digital phase of the model in detail. The study highlighted different steps of hierarchy of effects model and how it effectively influence customers mind in advertisement. The study mentioned the steps of awareness, interest, desire, action which is also known as AIDA model. The study anticipated that AIDA is the oldest acronym of marketing. It is best, will never change and can be applied to print, social, mobile, online and digital advertising.

Keywords

References

  • Alexander, T. & Ralph, S. (1965). Marketing Definitions. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association. Anderson, R., Barry, L. & Thomas, E. (1979). Advertising Management: Text and Cases. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
  • Aspinwall, L. V. (1964). Consumer Acceptance Theory. In Theory in Marketing, eds. Reavis. Cox, Wroe Alderson and Stanley J. Shapiro. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
  • Ashcroft, L. & Hoey, C. (2001). PR Marketing and the Internet: implications for information professionals. Library Management , 22(1/2), 68-74.
  • Baca, E. E., Holguin, J. J. & Stratemeyer, A. W. (2005). Direct-to-consumer advertising and young consumers: building brand value. Journal of Consumer Marketing , 22, 379–387.
  • Barry, T. F. (1987). The development of the hierarchy of effects: An historical perspective. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 10(1-2), 251-295.
  • Barry, T. E. & Howard, D. J. (1990). A review and critique of the hierarchy of effects in Advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 9(2), 121-135.
  • Bedell, C. (1940). How to Write Advertising That Sells. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
  • Belch, G. E. & Belch, M. A. (2001). Advertising and Promotion. An Integrated Marketing and Communications Perspective . Fifth Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Belch, G. E. & Belch, M. A. (2009). Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective, 8th edn, The McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston.
  • Bovee, C., John, T., George, D. & Marian, W. (1995). Advertising Excellence. New York: McGraw. Hill.
  • Cavill, N. & Bauman, A. (2004). Changing the way people think about health-enhancing physical activity: do mass media campaigns have a role? Journal of Sports Sciences, 22, 771-790.
  • Clow, K. E. & Baack, D. (2007). Advertising design: Message Strategies and Executional Framework . Third Edition, Pearson Education.
  • Coney, R. H. (1961). Defining Advertising Goals for Measured Advertising Results. New York: Association of National Advertisers.
  • Dawn, B. (2012). What is The DAGMAR Advertising Model? Retrieved from: http://suite101.com/article/what-is-the-dagmar-advertising-model-a192307 accessed on Oct, 1, 2012.
  • Devoe, M. (1956). Effective Advertising Copy. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • Dragon, R. (2011). Who Created AIDA? Retrieved from: http://www.dragonsearchmarketing.com/whocreated-aida/ . Accessed on 20-11-2013.
  • Gharibi, S., Danish, S. Y. S. & Shahrodi, K. (2012). Explain the Effectiveness of Advertising Using the AIDA model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research Business, 4(2), 926-940.
  • Ghirvu, A. I. (2013). The AIDA Model for Advergams. The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration , 1(17), 90-98.
  • Glowa, T. (2002). Advertising process models. White paper, North Country Research Inc.
  • Grover, R. & Vriens, M. (2006). The Handbook of Marketing Research. Sage Publication Ltd. Thousand Oaks.
  • Heuvel, D. V. (2012). The Hierarchy of Effects. Retrieved from: www.marketingsavant.com/.../Hierarchy_of_Effects_BriefingPaper.p... accessed on, September 30, 2012.
  • Jarmo, K., Jaana, S., Liisa, U. & Anssi, Ö. (2010). The Effects of Animation and Format on the Perception and Memory of Online Advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing , 24, 269–282.
  • Kotler, P. (2006). Marketing Management. Pearson Education.
  • Lavidge, R. C. & Steiner, L. (1961). A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness . Journal of Marketing, 25, 59-62.
  • Longman, K. A. (1971). Advertising. New York: Harcourt Brace. 255.
  • Lucas, D. B. & Steuart, H. B. (1950). Advertising Psychology and Research. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  • Lukka, V. & James, P. T. J. (2014). Attitudes toward Facebook advertising. Journal of Management and Marketing Research , 14, 1-26.
  • Macey, F. (1900). The Bissell Prize Advertisement Contest, Hardware, p. 44.
  • MacInnis, D. J. & Jaworski, K. (1989). Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework. Journal of Marketing , 53(4), 1-23.
  • McGuire, L. & William, J. (1969). An Information-Processing Model of Advertising Effectiveness. Paper presented to Symposium on Behavioral and Management Science in Marketing. University of Chicago.
  • Morris, B. & Holbrook (1975). A Review of Advertising Research. In John, A., Howard & James, H., Advertising and the Public Interest, ( eds), Appendix Two, Chicago: Crain.
  • Mohammadi, S., Esmaeily, N. & Salehi, N. (2012). Prioritization of promotion tools based on AIDA model by Analytic Hierarchy process in production sector of sport industry. Archives of Applied Science Research , 4(4), 1670-1675.
  • Petty, R. E. (1980). The Role of Cognitive Responses in Attitude Change Processes. In Richard, E., Petty, Thomas, M., Ostrom &Timothy .C. B. Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum: Cognitive Responses in Persuasion. Eds. 13-39.
  • Peterson, A. F. (1959). Pharmaceutical Selling. Heathcote-Woodbridge.
  • Pradipta, H. & Purwanto, L. (2013). The Relationship of AIDA model in Term of Website Design and Structure towards Purchase Decision Zalora Indonesia (A Case Study of President University Student). G.J. C.M.P., 2(2), 1-13. Rehman, F. U., Nawaz, T. & Hyder, S. (2014). A Comparative Analysis of Mobile and Email Marketing Using AIDA model. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research , 4(6), 38-49.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovation. New York: Free Press.
  • Robertson, K. & Thomas, S. (1971). Innovative Behavior and Communication. New York: HoIt, Rinehart, Winston.
  • Richard, T. & Vaughn, K. (1980). How Advertising Works: A Planning Model. Journal of Advertising Research, 20, 27-33.
  • Rossiter, J. & Percy, L. (1998). Advertising Communications & Promotion Management Second Edition , Irwin McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
  • Sandage, C. S. & Fryburger, V. F. (1967). Advertising Theory and Practice. ( 7th edition), New York: McGrawHill.
  • Strong, P. & Edward, K. (1922). The Psychology of Selling Life Insurance . New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers,
  • Strong, P. (1925a). The Psychology of Selling and Advertising. New York: McCraw-Hill.
  • Strong, P. (1925b). Theories of Selling. Journal of Applied Psychology. 9, 75-86.
  • Strong, P. (1938). Psychological Aspect of Business. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
  • Sheldon, O. & Arthur, F. (1911). The Art of Selling. Chicago: The Sheldon School.
  • Smith, R. E., Chen. J. & Yang, X. (2008). The Impact of Advertising Creativity on the Hierarchy of Effects. Journal of Advertising, 37(4), 47–61.
  • Tina, L. (2014). Analysis of "Avon" Ad-films using the AIDA Model. Retrieved from: http://marketingphilosopher101.blogspot.com/2012/08/analysis-of-avon-ad-films-using-aida.html. Accessed on 24-2-2014.
  • Vakratsas, D. & Ambler, T. (1999). How advertising works: What do we really know? Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 26-43.
  • Weilbacher, W. M. (2001). Point of view: Does advertising cause a hierarchy of effects? Journal of Advertising Research, 41(6), 19-26.
  • Wijaya, B. S. (2012). The Development of Hierarchy of Effects Model in Advertising. International Research Journal of Business Studies , 01, 73 – 85.
  • William, M. W. (2001). Point of View: Does Advertising Cause a Hierarchy of Effects? Journal of Advertising Research , 41(6).
  • Wood, N. T. & Burkhalter, J. (2013). Tweet this, not that: A comparison between brand promotions in micro blogging environments using celebrity and company-generated tweets. Journal of Marketing Communications , 20(1), 129-146.
  • Yoo, C. Y., Kim, K. & Stout, P. A. (2004). Assessing the Effects of Animation in Online Banner Advertising: Hierarchy of Effects Model. Journal of interactive advertising , 4(2), 49-60.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Rehman, F. ur, Javed, F., Nawaz, T., Ahmed, I., & Hyder, S. (2014). Some Insights in the Historical Prospective of Hierarchy of Effects Model: A Short Review. Information Management and Business Review, 6(6), 301-308. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v6i6.1128

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2014-12-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission