Author

  • Kereboon Champathed

    • Shinawatra International University, Thailand
    • Thailand
  • Chuvej Chansa-ngavej

    • Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology, Thailand
    • Thailand

Abstract

This paper examines the capital budgeting practice of Thai firms and the relationships between capital budgeting techniques and the firm size, length of operation and type of firms. The results indicated that most Thai firms used capital budgeting techniques for the analysis of investment projects (74.1%) and more than half (51.7%) of total corporate capital investment expenditures were screened by capital budgeting techniques. Discounted-cash-flow techniques were used by the majority of the firms with Internal Rate of Return (IRR) the most used evaluate techniques. Moreover, risk is quantified on individual project basis in assessing risk in investment decisions. Shortening the desired payback period was used most among the risk analysis techniques and the most likely scenario received most attention in the financial justification in relation to risk.

Keywords

References

  • Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C. & Allen, F. (2014). Principles of Corporate Finance (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Brigham, E. F. & Houston, J. F. (2009). Fundamentals of Financial Management. (6th ed.) Thomson SouthWestern, Mason, Ohio
  • Champathed, K. & Chansa-ngavej, C. (2012). A contingency model of capital budgeting decisions in the new economy. International Seminar on Science and Technology Innovations 2012 . Jakarta.
  • Chansa-ngavej, C. (2009). Total Profitability Analysis. Sinthu Creation, Bangkok.
  • Chen, S. (2008). DCF techniques and nonfinancial measures in capital budgeting: a contingency approach analysis. Behavioral Research in Accounting , 20(1), 13-29.
  • Gitman, L. J. & Forrester jr, J. R. (1977). Forecasting and evaluation practices and performance: a survey of capital budgeting . Financial Management , 6(3), 66-71.
  • Ingman, L. & Takala, J. (2010). Measuring CS by critical factor index in pricing process. Proceedings of the 7th International Conferece on Innovation& Management, pp. 665-671.
  • Klammer, T. (1972). Empirical evidence of the adoption of sophisticated capital budgeting techniques. The Journal of Business , 45(3), 387-397.
  • Mukherjee, T. K. (1993). The capital budgeting process of large U.S. firms; an analysis of capital budgeting manuals. Managerial Finance , 14(2), 28-35.
  • Myers, S. C. (1984). Finance theory and financial strategy. Interfaces , 14(1), 126–137.
  • Ong, T. S. & Teh, B. H. (2009). The use of financial and non-financial performance measures in the malaysian manufacturing companies. lCFAI Journal of Accounting Research , 8(1), 23-30.
  • Peterson, P. P. & Fabozzi, F. J. (2002). Capital budgeting: Theory and Practice. Willey, New York.
  • Pike, R. (1996). A longitudinal survey on capital budgeting practices. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting , 23(1), 79–92.
  • Ryan, P. A. & Ryan, G.P. (2002). Capital budgeting practices of the Fortune 100": how have things changed? Journal of Business & Management, 8(4), 355-364.
  • Sangster, A. (1993). Capital investment appraisal techniques: a survey of current usage. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting , 20(3), 307-332.
  • Schall, L. D., Sundem, G. L. & Geijsbeek Jr., W. R. (1978). A survey and analysis of captial budgeting methods. Journal of Finance , 33(1), 281-287.
  • Seitz, N. & Ellison, M. (2005). Capital Budgeting and Long-Term Financing Decisions. Southwestern, Mason, Ohio

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Champathed, K., & Chansa-ngavej, C. (2015). Capital Budgeting Practice of Thai Firms. Information Management and Business Review, 7(1), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v7i1.1139

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2015-02-28

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission