Author

  • John Agustinus

    • STIE Port Numbay Jayapura, Papua, Indonesia
    • Indonesia

Abstract

The purposes of this research to identify (1) the Special Autonomy Law, local government regulations and compliance in determining financial performance or management of special autonomy funds, (2) compliance, supervision, accountability of special autonomy funds in determining accountability for the management of special autonomy funds, (3) knowledge related to education and experience on which to base effective management and efficient fund and provide benefits to the people of the province. The qualitative paradigm is used in this research and phenomenology methods. The findings showed: Implementation of accountability required a strong commitment from the governor and the entire staff of the agency concerned, ensure proper use of resources is consistent with legislation in force, indicating the level of achievement of goals and objectives that have been set. Oriented to achieving the vision and mission, as well as the results and benefits obtained, honest, objective, transparent, and accurate, Presenting success or failure in achieving the goals and objectives that have been set.

Keywords

References

  • Abdullah, E. (1979). Agama, Etos Kerja dan Perkembangan Ekonomi. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  • Anderson, J. & Narus, J. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42-58.
  • Barbara, S. (2006). Mission Statement Quality and Financial Performance. European Management Journal, 24(1), 86–94, 2006 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • Barney. (1991). Knowledge and Accountability: Outside’s Directors’contribution in the corporate value chain. Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE) Lund University P.O. Box 117, Sölvegatan 16, S-221 00 Lund, SWEDEN http://www.circle.lu.se/publications ISSN 1654-3149
  • Child, J. & Faulkner, L. (1998). Strategies of Cooperation: Managing Alliances, Networks and Joint Ventures. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Constitution of Republic Indonesia, No 21. (2001). Special Autonomy for Province Papua.
  • Creswell, J. (1998). Mix Methods Research. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA. P.15
  • Das, T. K. & Teng, S. (1998). Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances.Journal of Intellectual CapitalAcademy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.
  • D’Aveni. (1995). Coping with hypercompetition: utilizing the new 7s’s framework. Journal Academy of Management Executive, 9(3), 45-60.
  • Gray, A. & Jenkins, B. (2003). Codes of accountability in the New Public Sector. Accounting Journal, 6(3), 52-67 © MCB University Press, 0951-3574.
  • Halim, A. (2008). Regional Financial Management. Managing Regional Financial. STIM YKPN, Yogyakarta.
  • Hayadi, K. (2006). Analysis of Performance of Midwife at Center of Society Health on Serving Antenatal in South Bengkulu, KMPK, WPS N0 11 April 2007 Yogyakarta
  • Kane & Johnson. (1995). Planning, Budgeting, Actuating, Administration and Controlling of Regional Financial Training and Education, Financial Management Practical (Financial Management Certified). Regulation of Ministry of Home Affairs 29/2002, 2005).
  • Kovach, H., Neligan, C. & Burali, S. (2003). Power Without Accoutability? The Global Accoutability Report 1, One World Trust, London, pdf download available at: www.oneworldtrust.org/htmlGAP/report.
  • Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
  • Ledvina, C. V. (1991). Accountability, Corruption and Democracy: A Clarification of Concepts, (in the Asian Review of Public Administration. Journal of Accounting, 3(2), December 1991)
  • Mardiasmo. (2002). Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah: Ed. II. Penerbit Andi Offset Yogyakarta, Hal 65.
  • Mardiasmo. (2006). Forming Transparency and Public Accountability Through Public Accounting: Tools for Good Governance. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintahan, 2(1), 1 – 17.
  • Maidepa, R. (2006). DevelopmentSynthesis in Papua. Team of Papua Capacity.
  • Moeller, K. (2009). Intangible and financial performance: causes and effects. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(2), 224-245 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited 1469-1930.
  • Parker, L. & Greame, G. (2000). Changing Public Sector Accountability: Critiquing New Directions. Blackwell Publiser.
  • Parsons, T. & Shils, E. (1952). Toward a General Theory of Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Pekman, J. (1998). Capital District Health Authority Research Ethics Board. http://www.governance.uottawa.ca/english/overview/o_defi.htm (accessed August 25th, 2003) Cited in McDonald q.v. See also D. Zussman, Proposed Governance Structure for the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Ottawa: Public Policy Forum, 1999). Version 2.11 August 28th, 2003
  • Penrose. (1959). Examining the penrose effect in an international business context: the dynamics of japanese firm growth in u.s. Industries. We are grateful to Richard Levin, Alvin Klevorick, Richard Nelson, and especially Sidney Winter for providing us with the data from their paper in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1987). Published: 2003 URL: http://www.business.uiuc.edu/Working_Papers/papers/03−0113.pdf
  • Regulation of Regional of Province Papua No 3/2004: Fundamentals of Regional Financial Management. Goverment of Province Papua,Regulation of Regional of Province PapuaNo. 5/2006, Education Development in Province Papua
  • Robert, J. (1991). The Possibilities of Accountability. Accounting, Organizaation, and Society, 16(4), 355-368
  • Siradjudin, S. H. & Aslam, I. (1995). Accoutability; The Endless Phropecy. Asian AND Pasific Development Centre
  • Saerang, D. P. E. (2001). Accountability and Accounting in a Religius Organization: an Interactive Ethnographic Study of the Pantecostal Church of Indonesia. Disertation University Wollonggong.
  • Spradley, J. P. (2003). Metodologi Etnografi. Penerjemah Misbah Zulfah Elizabeth. Yogyakarta. Penerbit; PT. Tiara Wacana
  • Sumule, A. (2008). Finding a central ways: Special Automony Provonce Papua. JayapuraCopyright © 2003, Agus Sumule, Penerbit Yayasan ToPanG, Jalan Cenderawasih C-65, Manokwari, Papua 98314 (Hal 23-24).
  • Sinclair, A. (1995). The Chamelon of Accountability; Forms and Discourses. Accouting, Organization, and Society, 2, 219-237.
  • Shearer, T. (2002). Ethics and Accountability. Accounting, Organization, and Society, 3, 541-573.
  • Teece, D. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3), 55-79.
  • Weber, M. (1960). Sekte-sekte Protestan dan Semangat Kapitalisme dalam Taufik
  • Wernerfelt. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-80.
  • Zaheer, A. & Venkatraman, V. (1995). Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: an empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 373-92.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Agustinus, J. (2015). Accountability Perspective: Implementation and Reporting on Spending Fund of Papua Special Autonomy. Information Management and Business Review, 7(2), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v7i2.1142

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2015 John Agustinus (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2015) Accountability, Conflict Management & Research Methods View issue contents

Published

2015-04-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission