Author

  • Mohd Rahim Khamis

    • Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor
    • Malaysia

  • Mohd Faizal Kamarudin

    • Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor
    • Malaysia

  • Nur Afizah Muhammad Ariffin

    • Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor
    • Malaysia

  • Mohd Faizan Mohd Afandi

    • Assistant Vice President, Al-Rajhi Bank
    • Malaysia

Abstract

The rapid growth of Islamic finance has increased the need for effective assessment methods that accurately evaluate students’ conceptual understanding of Islamic financial principles beyond the traditional score-based approaches. This study examines the application of the Rasch Wright Map in assessing students’ conceptual understanding of the Islamic financial system course. A quantitative research design was employed involving 84 first-year Islamic Banking students at Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). Data were collected using a nine-item Exit Survey Test (EST) designed to measure students’ general understanding and practical knowledge of the Islamic financial system. Rasch Model analysis using WINSTEPS 3.71.0.1 demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with item reliability recorded at +0.86 and person reliability at +0.68. The Wright Map provided a visual representation of students’ conceptual mastery by simultaneously mapping person ability and item difficulty along a single logit scale. The findings revealed that 61% of the students demonstrated good conceptual understanding and could apply their knowledge in practical contexts. However, several items related to Islamic capital markets, Islamic money markets, takaful, and retakaful were identified as challenging. The study concludes that the Rasch Wright Map is an effective psychometric tool for evaluating conceptual understanding in Islamic finance education and offers valuable implications for curriculum enhancement and instructional improvement.

Keywords

References

  • Abdullah, N., Noranee, S., & Khamis, M. R. (2017). The use of Rasch Wright map in assessing conceptual understanding of electricity. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 25, 81-92.
  • Ahmad, G. N., Widyastuti, U., Susanti, S., & Mukhibad, H. (2020). Determinants of Islamic financial literacy. Accounting, 6 (6), 961-966
  • Akbar, M., Akbar, A., Yaqoob, H. S., Hussain, A., Svobodová, L., & Yasmin, F. (2023). Islamic finance education: Current state and challenges for Pakistan. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1).
  • Azrilah, A. A. (2009). Rasch Model Fundamentals: Scale Construction and Measurement Structure. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Azrilah, A. A. (2011). Rasch Model Fundamentals: Scale construction and measurement structure, Kuala Lumpur: Integrated Advance Planning Sdn Bhd.
  • Bley, J., & Kuehn, K. (2009). Conventional versus Islamic finance: Student knowledge and perception in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. URL
  • Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4).
  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge
  • Dusuki, A. W. (2008). Understanding the objectives of Islamic banking: a survey of stakeholders' perspectives. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 1(2), 132-148
  • Fisher, W. P. J. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria, Rasch Measurement, Transaction, 21(1), 1095.
  • Jacobs, M., Mhakure, D., Fray, T., Holtman, L., & Julie, C. (2014). Using Rasch analysis to identify how physics students' understanding develops in a conceptual test. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2), 105–117.
  • Kay, L., Bundy, A., & Clemson, L. (2008). The use of the Rasch measurement model in the evaluation of learning outcomes: Implications for competency-based training in the health professions. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(4), 537–553.
  • Khamis, M. R., & Hashim, M. J. M. (2025). The Use of Rasch Wright Map in Assessing Conceptual Understanding of Islamic Economics. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 10(2), 1142-1150.
  • Khan, M. A., & Watson, T. (2003). Islamic Economics and Finance: A Glossary (2nd Edition). Routledge
  • Linacre, J. M. (1999). Understanding Rasch Measurement: Estimating Measures. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 13(2), 675.
  • McGregor, S. L. T., & Alghamdi, A. K. H. (2024). Measuring Islamic Financial Literacy. Financial Planning Research Journal, 10(1).
  • Nawi, F. A. M., Daud, W. M. N. W., Ghazali, P. L., Yazid, A. S., & Shamsuddin, Z. (2018). Islamic Financial Literacy: A Conceptualization and Proposed Measurement. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12).
  • Saputra, A. D., & Rahmatia, A. (2021). Islamic Financial Literacy Index Of Students: Bridging SDGs Of Islamic Finance. Economics And Finance In Indonesia, 67(1), 34.
  • Sick, J. (2009). Rasch measurement in language education: Part II. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13(2), 2–10.
  • Smith, E. V. (2005). Effects of item characteristics on test score validity: A Rasch perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(5), 820–837.
  • Yuslem, N., Nurhayati, N., & Hasibuan, A. F. H. (2023). Analysis of The Problems of Islamic Financial Literacy For Muslim Scholars. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 9(1), 45-61.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Khamis, M. R., Kamarudin, M. F., Muhammad Ariffin, N. A., & Mohd Afandi, M. F. (2026). Assessing Students’ Conceptual Understanding of an Islamic Financial System Course Using the Rasch Wright Map. Information Management and Business Review, 18(3(I), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v18i3(I).4885

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Mohd Rahim Khamis, Mohd Faizal Kamarudin, Nur Afizah Muhammad Ariffin, Mohd Faizan Mohd Afandi (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 18 No. 3(I) (2026) Digital Transformation, Sustainability & Learning Innovation View issue contents

Published

2026-09-18

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission