Author

  • Vadira Damayanti

    • Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia
    • Indonesia

  • Khoirul Aswar

    • Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia
    • Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of organizational factors, namely decision-making authority, organizational objectives and targets, incentives and technical knowledge on performance measurement. The research sample is the Regional Apparatus of the City of East Jakarta Administration's Head of Subdivision and Planning Staff. The sampling technique uses the census sampling method. The data analysis method uses Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using the Smart Partial Least Square application version 3.0. The findings reveal that technical knowledge has a considerable impact on performance measurement. Meanwhile, decision-making authority, organizational objectives and targets, and incentives have no significant effect on performance measurement. The findings of this study have implications for local governments to always maintain a code of ethics according to the standards for the preparation of LAKIP in order to realize effectiveness and efficiency so that government performance in the future can improve.

Keywords

References

  • Akbar, R., Pilcher, R. & Perrin, B. (2012). Performance measurement in Indonesia: The case of local government. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(3), 262-291. doi: 10.1108/01140581211283878
  • Aswar, K., Putri, L. E. & Ermawati, E. (2020). The effect of organizational factors on performance measurement in Indonesian local governments. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8(4), 122-131. doi: 10.35808/ijeba/574
  • Cavalluzzo, K. S. & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from the government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3), 243-267. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00013-8
  • DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. & Kuppelwiese, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Busniess Review, 26(2), 106-121.
  • Indudewi, D. & Nafasita, F. (2012). Pengaruh sasaran jelas dan terukur, insentif, desentralisasi, dan pengukuran kinerja terhadap kinerja organisasi (studi empiris pada SKPD dan BUMD Kota Semarang). Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 14(1).
  • Julnes, P. d. & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693-708. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00140
  • Khaeruddin, F. & Aditiya, R. (2020). Evaluasi implementasi sistem pengukuran kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah. ASSETS, 10(2), 195-209.
  • Khubiyati, A. & Arifin, J. (2016). Analisis pengaruh faktor institusional terhadap minat adopsi sistem informasi akuntansi keuangan daerah. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX.
  • Kloot, L. (1999). Performance measurement and accountability in Victorian local government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(7), 565-583. doi: 10.1108/09513559910308039
  • Mardiasmo. (2004). Akuntansi sektor publik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
  • Menpan.go.id. (2020). Pemda berhasil hemat anggaran SAKIP. From: https://menpan.go.id/site/beritaterkini/pemda-berhasil-hemat-anggaran-dengan-sakip (accessed: March 20, 2021)
  • Pabeno, J., Layuk, P. K. & Rante, A. (2016). Determinan penggunaan sistem pengukuran kinerja sektor publik. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah, 11(1), 13-28.
  • Pamungkas, D. (2012). A growth comparison of Ongole and European cross cattle kept by smallholder farmers in Indonesia. In Proceeding of the 15th Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production (AAAP) Animal Science Congress, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Parwoto. & Halim, A. (2020). The effects of organizational and political factors on the development of performance measurement systems (PMS) of local government institutions. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 21(2), 217-239. doi: 10.18196/jai.2102146
  • Podger, O. & Perwira. (2004). Review of Legislation on Planning and Budgeting.
  • Primarisanti, H. & Akbar, R. (2015). Factors influencing the success of performance measurement: evidence from local government. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 30(1), 56-71.
  • Putri, G. E. & Kamilah, F. (2019). Pengaruh faktor-faktor teknis dan organisasional terhadap pengembangan sistem pengukuran kinerja (studi pada opd kota pekanbaru). Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 16(1), 10-18.
  • Rochmat, K. B., Hamid, D. & Hakam, M. S. (2013). Pengaruh insentif terhadap motivasi dan kinerja. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 1(1), 19-27.
  • Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2017). Metode penelitian untuk bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  • Shafrizal, A., Taufik, T. & Nasir, A. (2018). Pengaruh faktor organisasional dan karakteristik Individu terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja melalui sistem pengukuran kinerja. Jurnal Ekonomi, 26(4), 102-115.
  • Sihaloho, F. L. & Halim, A. (2005). Pengaruh faktor-faktor rasional, politik dan kultur organisasi terhadap pemanfaatan informasi kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah. SNA, 8, 774-790.
  • Speklé, R. F. & Verbeeten, F. H. (2009). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 1-42. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1162242
  • Speklé, R. F. & Verbeeten, F. H. (2013). The use of performance measurement systems in the public. Management Accounting Research, 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004
  • Syachbrani, W. & Akbar, R. (2020). The influence factors of the development of performance measurement systems in Indonesia's central government. IEOM Society International.
  • Undp.org. (2021). Accountability. From: https://www.undp.org/accountability (accessed: March 16, 2021)
  • Vanhelden, G. J. (2005). Researching public sector transformation: The role of management accounting. Financial Accountability and Management, 21(1), 99–133.
  • Verbeeten, F. H. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 427-454.
  • Wang, X. (2002). Assessing performance measurement: A study of US local government. Public Performance and Management Review, 26, 26-43.
  • Wijaya, A. H. & Akbar, R. (2013). The influence of information, organizational objectives and targets, and external pressure towards the adoption of performance measurement systems In public sector. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 28(1), 62-83.
  • Yowi, L. R. (2011). The correlation among the factors of implementation, the system development, and the result of performance measurement system: A study conducted in the regency of Sumba Timur. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 26(3), 371-388.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Damayanti, V., & Aswar, K. (2021). Performance Measurement in Local Governments: An Analysis of Organizational Factors. Information Management and Business Review, 13(2(I), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v13i2(I).3215

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Vadira Damayanti, Khoirul Aswar (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 13 No. 2(I) (2021) CSR Disclosure, Project Success & Cybersecurity View issue contents

Published

2021-11-03

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission