Author

  • Mohadzlishah bin Mazli

    • Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Mohd Fikri bin Ishak

    • Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Ariff Azly bin Muhamed

    • Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

The act of counterfeiting spans across various industries and the impact can be seen beyond economic factors. In consumer behavior, the impact of status consumption and materialism has influenced purchase decisions in which consumption is not only based on how it makes an individual feel but also on those around them. Ultimately, the extent to which consumers may go in terms of getting status recognition influenced them to look for “cheaper” alternatives to genuine manufactured products. Hence the demand for counterfeit fashion products kept rising over the years. This research shows the impact of materialism and status consumption in influencing consumer attitudes toward counterfeit fashion products. Data were analyzed using a partial least square (PLS) approach to structural equation modeling (SEM). Materialism is significant in influencing attitude whereas there was no significant relationship found between status consumption and attitude.

Keywords

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978 (91)90020-T
  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitude and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall.
  • Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S. & Gentzkow, M. (2020). The Welfare Effects of Social Media. American Economic Review, 110(3), 629–676.
  • Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 798–844). Clark University Press.
  • Amran, H., Nurul Adzwina A. B., Norazah, M. S., & Zuhal, H. (2012). Why customers do not buy counterfeit luxury brands? Understanding the effects of personality, perceived quality and attitude on unwillingness to purchase. Labuan E-Journal of Muamalat and Society, 6, 14–29.
  • Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Kost, K., Sammon, M. & Viratyosin, T. (2020). The Unprecedented Stock Market Reaction to COVID-19. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 10(4), 742–758.
  • Becker, J. M., Klein, K. & Wetzel, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45, 359–394.
  • Belk, R. W. (1997). Third World Consumer Culture. Frontier Issues in Economic Thought, 2, 311–313.
  • Cunningham, N. (2023). The role of social group influences when intending to purchase premium alcohol. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1).
  • Dalziel, R. & Sharp, K. L. (2023). The effect of variety seeking and status consumption on generation Y consumers’ attitude toward beauty products: The mediating role of innovativeness. Innovative Marketing, 19(1), 208–219.
  • Eastman, J. K., Goldsmith, R. E. & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 41.
  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
  • Furnham, A. & Valgeirsson, H. (2007). The effect of life values and materialism on buying counterfeit products. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(5), 677–685.
  • Habib, M. D. & Bekun, F. V. (2023). Does religiosity matter in impulsive psychology buying behaviors? A mediating model and empirical application. Current Psychology, 42(12), 9986–9998.
  • Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Hair, J. F., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B. & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458.
  • Hulland, J. (1999). Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204.
  • Khalek, S. A. & Chakraborty, A. (2023). Shared consumption and its determinants: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(3), 888–921.
  • Kozar, J. M. & Marcketti, S. B. (2011). Examining ethics and materialism with purchase of counterfeits. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111111154536
  • Lohmoller, J. B. (1989). Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Physica-Verlag.
  • Muncy, J. A. & Eastman, J. K. (1998). Materialism and consumer ethics: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 137.
  • Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living (2022). KPDN Main Statistics 2022, https://www.kpdn.gov.my/en/media-kpdnhep/penerbitan/statistik-utama-kpdn/2022-en.
  • Omar, M. K., Zakaria, A. & Mohamed, B. A. (2015). The Determinants of Employee Attitude towards e-HRM-A Study of Engineering Company in Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 7(4), 117–121.
  • Ozgen, O. & Esiyok, E. (2020). Consumer ethics, materialism and material satisfaction: A study on Turkish adolescent consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(1), 14–24.
  • Phau, I., Sequeira, M. & Dix, S. (2009). Consumers’ willingness to knowingly purchase counterfeit products. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 3(4), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/17505930911000865
  • Phau, I. & Teah, M. (2009). Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: a study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760910927019
  • Philips, T. (2007). Knockoff: The Deadly Trade in Counterfeit Goods: The True Story of the World’s Fastest Growing Crime Wave. Kogan Page.
  • Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H. & Mumtaz, A. M. (2018). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An Updated and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis (1st Ed.). Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd.
  • Ramesh, K., Saha, R., Goswami, S., Sekar. & Dahiya, R. (2018). Consumer’s response to CSR activities: Mediating role of brand image and brand attitude. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 377–387.
  • Richins, M. L. & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316.
  • Schiffman, L. & Wisenbilt, J. L. (2019). Consumer Behavior (12th Ed.). Pearson.
  • Suttikun, C., Mahasuweerachai, P. & Bicksler, W. H. (2023). Marketing strategies in the age of <scp>COVID</scp> ?19: An Attitude, Belief, Context Approach. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 51(4), 262–276.
  • Tangri, K. & Yu, H. (2023). Why buy used? Motivators and barriers for re-commerce luxury fashion. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management.
  • Velandia-Morales, A., Rodríguez-Bailón, R. & Martínez, R. (2022). Economic Inequality Increases the Preference for Status Consumption. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
  • Wang, R., Liu, H. & Jiang, J. (2022). Does Socioeconomic Status Matter? Materialism and Self-Esteem: Longitudinal Evidence from China. Current Psychology, 41(3).
  • Wold, H. O. A. (1982). Soft Modeling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions. In Systems Under Indirect Observation. Causality, Structure, Prediction (pp. 1–54). North-Holland.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Mazli, M. bin, Ishak, M. F. bin, & Muhamed, A. A. bin. (2023). The Role of Status Consumption and Materialism in Influencing Attitude towards Counterfeit Fashion Product. Information Management and Business Review, 15(3(SI), 344-350. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v15i3(SI).3490

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Mohadzlishah bin Mazli, Mohd Fikri bin Ishak, Ariff Azly bin Muhamed (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 15 No. 3(SI) (2023) Technology and Entrepreneurship: Revitalizing Business Sustainability Models View issue contents

Published

2023-09-17

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission