Author

  • Salima Hafeez

    • Iqra University, Islamabad, Pakistan
    • Pakistan

  • Asif Mehmood Rana

    • Iqra University, Islamabad, Pakistan
    • Pakistan

  • Rashid Mehmood Chaudhry

    • Iqra University, Islamabad, Pakistan
    • Pakistan

  • Muhammad Aslam Khan

    • Preston University, Islamabad, Pakistan
    • Pakistan

  • H.Mushtaq Ahmad

    • Iqra University, Islamabad, Pakistan
    • Pakistan

  • Kashif Ur Rehman

    • Iqra University, Islamabad, Pakistan
    • Pakistan

Abstract

The characteristics of entrepreneurial orientation is played important role in business. How do an entrepreneurial firms and individuals have taken the advantage in industry? This study explores the dynamic capabilities of the organization according to international performance. Our findings indicates the positive impact on dynamic capabilities of the business with perfectly use of this research framework. The main aspect of this paper is to analyse the impact of entrepreneurial orientation with the quality of life. Distinctive features of entrepreneurs and their contribution to the economy can make it possible for third world countries to grow their economies faster and provide financial means to enhance social, health, and environmental well-being (basic dimensions of quality of life), along with products and services that the poor need in these countries. Entrepreneurial orientation combined with organization learning and Quality of life (QOL) are enhanced the dynamic capability of the organization. Present conceptual research will provide the source of competitive advantage and mainstream line for further development of the business .We suggest that existing literature reconfiguring the different approaches for the entrepreneurial to capture the opportunities in world business. First, quality of life cannot possibly improve in inactive or weakening economic conditions; second, economic development in the third world countries cannot advance in a balanced and desirable manner without a major domestic entrepreneurship movement (Samli 2004, 2008a).

Keywords

References

  • Ahlstrom, D. & Bruton, G. D. (2002). An institutional perspective on the role of culture in shaping strategic actions by technology-focused entrepreneurial firms in China. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice , 26(4), 53–69.
  • Ambrosini, V. & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews , 11(1), 29–49.
  • Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Baker, T., Gedajilovic, E. & Lubatkin, M. (2005). A framework of comparing entrepreneurship processes across nations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(5), 492–506.
  • Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision , 36(2), 63–76
  • Cepeda, G. & Vera, D. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research , 60(3), 426–437.
  • Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Coskun, P & Samli, A. C. (2008). Entrepreneurship Economic Development and Quality of Life in ThirdWorld Countries. Applied Research Quality Life , 3, 203–213.
  • Collis, D. J. (1994). Research note: How valuable are organizational competence. Strategic Management Journal , 15, 143–152.
  • Covin, J. G. & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal , 10(1), 75–87.
  • Covin, J. G., Green, K. M. & Slevin, D. P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 30, 57–81.
  • Crossan, M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review , 24(3), 522–538.
  • D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hyper-competition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Manoeuvring. New York: The Free Press
  • Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing , 16(5), 429– 451.
  • Dess, G. G., Ireland, R. D., Zahra, S. A., Floyd, S. W., Janney, J. J. & Lane, P. J. (2003). Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management , 29(3), 351–378.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, M. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal , 21(10), 1105–1121.
  • Fiol, C. M. & Lyles, M. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review , 10, 803–813.
  • Griffith, D. A. & Harvey, M. G. (2001). A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies , 32(3), 597–606.
  • Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Hao, J. (2010). School of Business, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
  • Helfat, C. E. & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal , 24(10), 997–1010.
  • Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science , 2(1), 88–115.
  • Iansiti, M. & Clark, K. B. (1994). Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial and Corporate Change , 3(3), 557–605.
  • Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S. & KylÃheiko, K. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship , 3, 223–243.
  • Jiang, W. (2010). School of Business, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
  • Lawson, B. & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organizations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management , 5(3), 377–400.
  • Lau, C. M. & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). Growth intentions of entrepreneurs in a transitional economy: The People’s Republic of China. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice , 26(1), 5–20.
  • Lewis, L. (2000). Working Together: 12 principles for Achieving Excellence in Managing Projects, Teams, and organization, Publisher-McGraw Hill, Chicago, London, New Delhi, and Toronto, 34-37.
  • Li, X. (2006). Dynamic Capabilities Theory: Identification, Construction and Formation Mechanism, 52–67.
  • Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review , 21(1), 135–172.
  • Luo, Y. & Park, S. H. (2001). Strategic alignment and performance of market-seeking MUCs in China. Strategic Management Journal , 22, 141–155.
  • McDougall, P. P., Shane, S. & Oviatt, B. M. (1994). Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research. Journal of Business Venturing , 9, 469-487.
  • Naman, J. L. & Slevin, D. P. (1993). Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal , 14, 137–153.
  • Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Samli, A. C. (2004). Entering and succeeding in emerging countries. Masons, Ohio: ThomsonSouthwestern.
  • Samli, A. C. (2008a). Globalization from the bottom-up. New York: Springer.
  • Schilling, J. & Kluge, A. (2008). Barriers to organizational learning: an integration of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews , 10(2).
  • Sun, P. Y. T. & Scott, J. L. (2005). Sustaining second order change initiation: structured complexity and interface management. Journal of Management Development , 24, 879–895.
  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal , 28(4), 1319–1350.
  • Teece, D. J., Piano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal , 18(7), 509–533.
  • Tsoukas, H. & Mylonopoulos, N. (2004). Organizations as Knowledge Systems: Knowledge, Learning and Dynamic Capabilities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wiklund, J. & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing , 20, 71–91.
  • Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal , 24(10), 991– 995.
  • Yu, C. (2010). School of Business, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
  • Zahra, S. A. & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing , 10(1), 43–58.
  • Zahra, S. A. & George, G. (2002). The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information Systems Research , 13(2), 147–151.
  • Zahra, S. A., Nielsen, A. P. & Bogner, W. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, and competence development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice , 23(3), 169–190.
  • Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J. & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies , 43(4), 917–955.
  • Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal , 24(2), 97–112.
  • Zollo, M. & Winter, S. G. (1999). From organizational routines to dynamic capabilities. Working Paper of the Reginald H. Jones Center, the Wharton School University of Pennsylvania.
  • Zollo, M. & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science , 13(3), 339–351.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Hafeez, S., Rana, A. M., Chaudhry, R. M., Khan, M. A., Ahmad, H., & Rehman, K. U. (2011). Perspectives of Entrepreneurial Orientation with the Quality of Life. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 3(6), 388-394. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v3i6.295

Share this article

License

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 3 No. 6 (2011) Volatility, Behaviour & Economic Modelling View issue contents

Published

2011-12-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission