Author

  • Mashhud Adenrele Fashola

    • University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
    • Nigeria

Abstract

As economic growth may reach a point where further socio-economic development is not sustainable due to continual environmental degradation having negative development impact, the paper proposes a methodology for determining global central tendency for the saturation point of economic growth in its impact on sustainable development. The theoretical framework adopts a modified classical growth model, where economic growth is considered a means towards development, just as capital stock constitutes a means towards economic growth. In such a model, the impact of economic growth on sustainable development exhibits diminishing “marginal social productivity”, until development reaches a stationary state , where the impact of growth reaches its climax and any further growth will bring a decline on the level of development. Economic growth is measured by per capita income while selected development indicators measure development. The factors responsible for the diminishing “marginal social productivity” of economic growth are population growth and depreciation rates of capital stock and physical environment. For empirical investigation, econometric studies explored the dependence of various development indicators on per capita income (US$ PPP ) for 99 countries, with a-priori expectation that the development indicators will progress with economic growth at a decreasing rate and reach saturation point. The results revealed that the saturation point or ultimate level of sustainable development is attained at per capita income of $36,400 500 ( PPP ), a level exceeded by 13 percent of the countries. Results also showed that environmental degradation is both a causal factor and consequence of contemporary growth.

Keywords

References

  • Aghion, P. & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.
  • Daly, H. E. (1973). Towards a Steady State Economy. San Francisco: Freeman
  • Daly, H. E. (1991). Steady State Economics, 2nd ed. Washington DC: Island Press.
  • Goulet, D. (1971). The Cruel Choice: A New Concept in the Theory of Development. New York: Atheneum.
  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science; New York: Penguin.
  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth; New York: University Books.
  • Meadows, D. H., Randers, J. & Meadows, L. (2004). The Limits to Growth: The 30-year update. Chelsea: Chelsea Green Publishing Co.
  • Todaro, M. P. & Smith, S. C. (2009). Economic Development. 10th ed., Addison-Wesley: London.
  • Seers, D. (1969): The Meaning of Development. Paper presented at the Eleventh World Conference of the Society for International Development. New Delhi.
  • Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: Elsevier,.
  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
  • Silver, R. (1976). The Sustainable Society: Ethics and Economic Growth; Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
  • Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical Change and Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312-320.
  • Solow, R. M. (1993). Sustainability: An Economist’s Perspective in R. Dorfman & S. Dorfman, (eds.) (1993). Economics of the Environment: Selected Readings. 3rd edn. New York: Norton.
  • UNDP (2002). Human Development Report: Deepening democracy in a fragmented world; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • World Bank (1991). World Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Fashola, M. A. (2012). Determining Growth Saturation Point for Sustainable Development. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 4(2), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v4i2.308

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2012-02-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission