Author

  • John Walsh

    • School of Management, Shinawatra University, Bangkok, Thailand
    • Thailand

Abstract

The origin of contemporary East Asian economic development coincided with and was to some extent caused by the consequences of the Cold War. It was characterized by state-led developmental models focusing on import-substituting, export-oriented manufacturing with low labour cost competitiveness. States generally designated specific areas in which these activities could take place and regulated all aspects of their conduct and the distribution of profits resulting from them. As at least some of the states involved have moved towards a post-authoritarian stage of development, the places in which industrial development has taken place have broadened in scope and followed private rather than public sector priorities. This paper examines this trend and then identifies the principal management challenges arising from it.

Keywords

References

  • Amsden, A. (1992). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Balakrishnan, G. (2009). On the Stationary State. New Left Review , 59, 5-26.
  • Barbieri, E., Di-Tommaso, M. R. & Bonnini, S. (2011). Industrial development policies and performances in Southern China: Beyond the specialised industrial cluster program. China Economic Review, in press.
  • Berger, M. T. (2003). Battering down the Chinese walls: The antinomies of Anglo-American liberalism and the history of East Asian capitalism in the shadow of the cold war, in C.J.W-L Wee (Ed.), Local cultures and the new Asia. Singapore: ISEAS. 77-106.
  • Cai, F. & Wang, M. (2010). Growth and structural changes in employment in transition China, Journal of Comparative Economics , 38(1), 71-81.
  • Chang, J. (2011). The early and rapid internationalization of Asian emerging MNEs. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness , 21(2), 71 – 187.
  • Crispin, S. W. (2007). Cambodia’s cowboy capitalism. Asia Times Online (July 13). Retrieved from http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/IG13Ae01.html.
  • Emmerson, D. K. (1995). Singapore and the Asian values debate. Journal of Democracy , 6(4), 95-105.
  • Farole, T. (2011). Special economic zones in Africa . New York: The World Bank. doi: 10.1596/978-0-82138638-5.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry , 12(2), 21945.
  • Ge, W. (1999). Special economic zones and the opening of the Chinese economy: Some lessons for economic liberalization. World Development , 27(7), 1267-85.
  • Gong, W. (1989). The legacy of Confucian culture in Maoist China. The Social Science Journal , 26(4), 36374.
  • Kim, B. (2010). Cultural forces and historical events to shape organizing principles in Korea: An exploratory perspective. Management Decision , 48(5), 826 – 841.
  • Kunmakara, M. (2010). Cheap labour pays dividends. The Phnom Penh Post (July 9). Retrieved from http://www.phnompenhpost.com/index.php/2010070940377/Business/cheap-labour-paysdividends.html.
  • Linn, T. (2010). Dawei deep-sea port, SEZ gets green light. Myanmar Times (November 15-21st ). Retrieved from http://www.mmtimes.com/2010/business/549/biz54901.html.
  • Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London: MacMillan.
  • Morris, J. (1988). The who, why and where of Japanese manufacturing investment in the UK. Industrial Relations Journal , 19(1), 31-40.
  • Olson, E. G. (2009). Business as environmental steward: The growth of greening. Journal of Business Strategy , 30(5), 4 – 13.
  • Pereira, A. (2004). The Suzhou industrial park experiment: The case of China-Singapore governmental collaboration. Journal of Contemporary China , 13(38), 173-93.
  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review , 2, 77-90.
  • Preecharushh, D. (2009). Naypyidaw: New capital of Burma. Bangkok: White Lotus.
  • Sassen, S. (1999). Whose city is it? Globalisation and the formation of New Claims, in Foo, A.F. and Yuen, B. (eds.). Sustainable cities in the 21st Century. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 145-62.
  • Wallerstein, I. (2010). Structural crises. New Left Review, 62, 133-42.
  • Walker, R. A. (1999). Putting capital in its place: Globalization and its prospects for labour. Geoforum , 30(3), 263-84.
  • Walsh, J. & Anantarangsi, S. (2009). Management style of Chinese business owners in the Chiang Rai province of Thailand. Southeast Asian Journal of Management , 3(1), 29-40.
  • Walsh, J. & Techavimol, P. (2009). Following the Korean model: Management of the online computer games industry in Thailand. GITAM Journal of Management , 7(3), 1-13.
  • Ward, S., Pearson, C. & Entrekin, L. (2002). Chinese cultural values and the Asian meltdown. International Journal of Social Economics , 29(3), 205–217.
  • Zeng, D. Z. (2010). Building engines for growth and competitiveness in China . New York: World Bank.
  • Zhengyi, W. (2009). Transition paradigm, industrial policy and economic growth in China: Domestic and international forces. In Chirathivat, S. and Yuen, N.C, (eds.), Emerging Asia’s growth practices: Recent experiences of China, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand. Bangkok: Chula Global Network, 35-61.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Walsh, J. (2012). Management Challenges of Post-Authoritarian Developmentalist Industrial Geography in East Asia. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 4(7), 390-396. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v4i7.340

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2012-07-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission