Author

  • Gulsun Atanur Baskan

    • Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
    • Türkiye
  • Saduman Kapusuzoglu

    • Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey
    • Türkiye

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare and assess the Regulations of Elementary Education Directorates and Education Supervisors Directorates approved in 2011 from structure, process and rationale. In accordance with this purpose, the opinions of education supervisors (N=74) were determined by the questionnaire developed in accordance with the regulations by the researchers and consisted of 35 items. Data gathered was analyzed by mean. As a result, it was reached to the conclusion that supervisors do not agree with the changes related to application requirements to competitive exam. They agreed with the changes related to the items such as organization of written exam, appointment and location changes, extension of scope of duty of supervisors “partially” and they agreed with the changes related to subjects and point weights of competitive exam training and appointments of supervisors.

Keywords

References

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Baskan, G. A., & Kapusuzoglu, S. (2013). Comparative Assessment of Supervisory Regulations Related to Appointment, Training and Change of Location. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 5(3), 185-191. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v5i3.393

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2013-03-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission