Abstract
This study attempts to identify the various service and value factors that matter most to domestic airline passengers in South Africa and to benchmark it with the domestic airline industry in Malaysia that has similar airline services. A survey methodology involving face-to-face interviews was employed to conduct interviews with 196 participants from South Africa and 189 from Malaysia. Respondents were targeted on a convenience basis. Despite the use of this non-probabilistic sampling method, the data that were yielded showed high levels of internal consistency. A random splitting of each of the two datasets (i.e. South Africa and Malaysia) and subsequent comparison of firstly, demographic characteristics and secondly, the average ratings of key items revealed no significant differences, thus confirming repeatability or reproducibility of measurement. Trained fieldworkers assisted with the interviews. The findings revealed the following. The first research objective identifies those aspects that respondents typically consider most and least important when travelling on a domestic airline. The mean importance ratings obtained for each of the service items were calculated and ranked from highest to lowest scores. The items were ranked within the four broader service dimensions for the two samples. The first dimension is labelled ‘convenience of booking’ and the results reveal considerable similarities between the two samples, with both South African and Malaysian respondents rating online booking opportunity as the most important aspect within these dimensions. The second service dimension investigated in the study is ‘cabin service scapes’. The item that was rated most important by both South African and Malaysian respondents was comforts of the seats. The third service dimension labelled ‘cabin crew’. Cabin crew's credibility obtained the highest average importance rating. The last dimension studied was labelled ‘timeliness of flight’. The top rated item was on-time departures and arrivals.
Keywords
References
- Aksoy, S., Atilgan, E. & Akinci, S. (2003). Airline services marketing by domestic and foreign firms: differences from the customers’ viewpoint. Journal of Air Transport Management, 9, 343-351.
- Atalik, O. (2007). Customer complaints about airline service: a preliminary study of Turkish frequent flyers. Management Research News , 30(6) 409-419.
- Babbar, S. & Koufteros, X. (2008). The human element in airline service quality: contact personnel and the customer. International Journal Operations and Production Management, 28(9), 804-830.
- Bowden, B. D. & Headley, D. E. (2005). Airline quality rating report 2005. W.F. Barton School of Business, Wichita, KS, available at: www.aqr.aero
- Bukhari, S. M. F., Ghoneim, A., Dennis, C. & Jamjoom, B. (2013). The antecedents of travellers’ e- satisfaction and intention to buy airline tickets online. Journal of Enterprise Information Management , 26(6), 624-641.
- Chang, Y. H. & Yeh, C. H. (2002). A survey analysis of service quality for domestic airlines. European journal of operational research, 39, 9(1), 166-177.
- De Jager, J. W. (2012). Domestic Airline service expectations in South Africa and Italy. International Journal of Business Policy and Economics , 5 (1), 185-198.
- De Jager, J. W., van Zyl, D. & Toriola, A. L. (2012). Airline service quality in South Africa and Italy. Journal of Air Transport Management , 25, 19-21.
- Done, K. (2005). A business model going places? Premium airlines lay down a challenge for the big network carriers, Financial Times, 14 Oct, 13.
- Fick, G. & Richie, J. (1991). Measuring service quality in the travel and tourism industry. Journal of Travel Research, Fall, 2(9).
- Graham, A. (2008). Managing Airports (3rd Ed.). Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann.
- Gustafsson, A., Ekdahl, F. & Edvardsson, B. (1999). Customer focused service development in practice. A case study at Scandinavian Airlines System (SAS). International Journal of Service Industry Management , 10(4), 344-358.
- Law, R., Qi, S. & Buhalis, D. (2010). Progress in tourist management: a review of website evaluation in tourism research. Tourism Management , 31, 297-313
- Le Bel, J. L. (2005). Beyond the friendly skies: an integrative framework for managing the air travel experience. Managing Service Quality, 15(5), 437-451.
- Lovelock, C., Patterson, P. & Walker, R. (2001). As cited by Atalik, O. 2007. Customer complaints about airline service: a preliminary study of Turkish frequent flyers. Management Research News, 30(6), 409-419.
- McKechnie, D. S., Grant, J. & Golawala, F. S. (2011). Partitioning service encounters into touch points to enhance quality . International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 3(2), 146-165.
- Moneim, A. & Ahmed, M. B. (2008). Create superior customer values: new direction for Middle Eastern airlines. Education, business and society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 1(4), 289-299.
- Namukasa, J. (2013). The influence of airline service quality on passenger satisfaction and loyalty: The case of Uganda airline industry. The TQM Journal , 25(5), 520-532.
- Nejati, M., Nejati, M. & Shafaei, A. (2009). Ranking airlines’ service quality factors using a fuzzy approach: study of the Iranian society. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26(3), 247260.
- Nowak, L. I. & Newton, S. K. (2006). Using the taste room experience to create loyal customers. International Journal of Wine Marketing , 18(3), 157-165.
- Palmer A. (2008). Principles of services marketing . 5th ed. London: McGraw-Hill.
- Park, J. W. (2007). Passenger perception of service quality: Korean and Australian case studies. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13, 238-242.
- Park, J. W., Robertson, R. & Wu, C. L. (2004). The affect of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioural intentions: a Korean case study. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, 435-439.
- Reed, D. (2007). Airlines may never fly right on customer service, expert warns. USA today, October 19.
- Rhoades, D. L. & Waguespack, B. (2008). Twenty years of service quality performance in the US airline industry. Managing service quality , 18(1), 20-33.
- Saha, G. C. (2009). Service quality, satisfaction and behavioural intentions. A study of low-cost airline carriers in Thailand. Managing service quality , 19(3), 350-372.
- Singhaseni, C., Wu, Y. & Ojiako, U. (2013). Modeling overbooking’s on air cargo transportation. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 43(8), 638-656.
- Slatten, T. & Mehmetogly, M. (2011). Antecedents and effects of engaged frontline employees. Managing service quality, 21(1), 88-107.
- Sreenivasan, N. D. S., Lee, C. S. & Goh, D. H. (2012). Tweeting the friendly skies. Program: Electronic library and information systems, 46 (1), 21-42.
- Sultan, F. & Simpson, M. C. (2000). International service variants: airline passenger expectations and perceptions of service quality. Journal of Services Marketing , 14(3), 188-216.
- Tiernan, S., Rhoades, D. L. & Waguespack, B. (2008). Airline service quality. Managing service quality, 8(3), 212-224.
- Wirtz, J., Heracleous, L. & Pangarkar, N. (2008). Managing human resources for excellence and cost effectiveness at Singapore Airlines. Managing service quality , 18(1), 4-19.
- Yu, R. (2007a). Flight delays worst in 13 years, USA Today, online edition available at: www.usatoday.com/pt/cp?action.
- Zane, C. K. & Reyes, P. M. (2010). Airlines’ plight: where has all the baggage gone? Management Research Review , 33(7), 767-782.
Downloads
No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.
How to Cite
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Johan W de Jager, Dion van Zyl (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
Keywords
Section
Published
Submissions
Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.
Make a Submission