Author

  • Gert Abraham Lowies

    • University of Pretoria, South Africa
    • South Africa

  • John Henry Hall

    • University of Pretoria, South Africa
    • South Africa

  • Christiaan Ernst Cloete

    • University of Pretoria, South Africa
    • South Africa

Abstract

Behavioural finance describes investors’ and managers’behaviour in terms of their interactions, andhow their behaviour subsequently influences financial and capital markets. One aspect of behavioural finance, frame dependence, reflects the fact that decision-makers may model decisions about problems using subjective frames. Such decisions may lead to errors in judgement. This study’s objective was to determine whether frame dependence influences listed property fund managers in South Africa’s property investment decisions.Therefore, the study examinedquestionsrelating to the disposition effect and loss aversion,as well asfactors influencing selling decisions and the time and difficulty involved in making buying and selling decisions. The study surveyed the fund managers of all South African-based property funds listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE). Non-parametric statistical measures were used.The resultsreveal the presence of the disposition effect and a strong desire to cut losses as a motivating factor to sell a property. In the context of the difficulties associated with, and time spent in, buying new properties, it appears that South African property fund managers are, to some extent, lossaverse. This study recommends that fund managers be alerted to the presence of frame dependence in their decisions, so that they canincorporate it in their normative investment strategies.They need to know that they are loss averse in their investment decision-making, resulting ina possible loss of perfectly positioned, profitable investment opportunities. This study expands the body of knowledge surrounding property investment decision behaviour in an emerging market.

Keywords

References

  • Barberis, N. & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioural finance. In: Constantinides, M.H. &Stulz, R. (eds.), Handbook of Economics and Finance (pp. 1054-1123) . Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Benartzi, S. & Thaler, R. H. (2007). Heuristics and biases in retirement savings behavior. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 81-104.
  • Black, R. T., Brown, G. M., Diaz III, J., Gibler, K. M. & Grissom, T. V. (2003). Behavioral research in real estate: a search for the boundaries. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 15(3), 85-112.
  • Brown, D. & Lewis, L. M. (1981). Myopic economic agents. Econometrica, 49(2), 359-368.
  • Chen, G., Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R. & Rui, O. M. (2007). Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 425-451.
  • Chen, W. K. & Tsao, C. T. (2010). The third order cumulative prospect stochastic dominance in portfolio management. Working paper. Kaohsiung, Taiwan:
  • Crosby, N. & McAllister, P. (2004). Deconstructing the transaction process, Working Paper 2.In: Bond,S., Crosby, N., Hwang, S., Lizieri, C., Matysiak, G., McAllister, P.& Ward, C. (eds.), Liquidity in Commercial Property Markets: Research Findings (pp. 22-39). London: IPF.
  • Doeswijk, R. Q. (1997). Contrarian investment in the Dutch stock market. De Economist, 145(4), 573-598.
  • Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
  • Fogel, S. O. C. & Berry, T. (2006). The disposition effect and individual investor decisions: the roles of regret and counterfactual alternatives. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 7(2), 107-116.
  • Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. & O'Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discount and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401.
  • French, N. & French, S. (1997). Decision theory and real estate investment. Journal of Property Valuation & Investment, 15(3), 226-232.
  • Gallimore, P., Hansz, A. J. & Gray, A. (2000).Decision making in small property companies. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 18(6), 602-612.
  • Godoi, C. K., Marcon, R. & Da Silva, B. (2005). Loss aversion: a qualitative study in behavioural finance. Managerial Finance, 31(4), 46-56.
  • Henneberry, J. & Roberts, C. (2008). Calculated inequality? Portfolio benchmarking and regional office property investment in the UK. Urban Studies, 45(5&6), 1217-1241.
  • Hennings, K. & Samuels, W. (1990). Neoclassical Economic Theory, 1870 to 1930. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow . New York, NY: Farar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • MacCowan, J. R. & Orr, A. M. (2008). A behavioural study of the decision processes underpinning disposals by property fund managers. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 26(4), 342-361.
  • Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. London: YaleUniversity Press.
  • Menkhoff, L. & Nikiforow, M. (2009). Professionals' endorsement of behavioural finance: does it impact their perception of markets and themselves? Journal of Economic Behavior& Organization, 71, 318-329.
  • Mooya, M. (2010). The South African property industry: overview and issues for research. Acta Structilia, 17(2), 149-169.
  • Muneer, S. & Rehman, S. U. (2012). Materialization of Behavioral Finance and Behavioral Portfolio Theory: A Brief Review. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies , 4(8), 431-435
  • Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economics Literature, 36, 11-46.
  • Ramabodu, M. S., Kotze, B. G. & Verster, J. J. P. (2007). Diversity and value in Africa's real estate. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 25(1), 7-22.
  • Samuelson, P. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. Review of Economic Studies, 4, 155-161.
  • SAPOA/IPD South Africa Annual Property Index. (2011). Results for the year to December 2011. Morningside, South Africa: Investment Property Databank.
  • Sargent, T. J. (2010). Rational expectations [Homepage of Library of Economics and Liberty], [Online]. Available: http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/ RationalExpectations.html [Accessed 2010-0914].
  • Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1980). Experiments on Decisions under Risk: the Expected Utility Hypothesis. Boston, MA: Nijhoff.
  • Shefrin, H. (2002). Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioural Finance and the Psychology of Investing. New York, NY: OxfordUniversity Press.
  • Shiller, R. J. (1999). Human behavior and the efficiency of the financial system. In: Taylor, J.B. & Woodford, M. (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics (pp. 1306-1334) . New Haven, CT: Elsevier Science.
  • Shiller, R. J. (2003). From Efficient Markets Theory to behavioural finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 83-104.
  • Stracca, L. (2004). Behavioral finance and asset prices: where do we stand? Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 373-405.
  • Szyszka, A. (2010). Behavioral anatomy of the financial crisis. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra, 121-135.
  • Tversky, A. (1975). A critique of expected utility theory: descriptive and normative considerations. Erkenntnis, 9(2), 163-173.
  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.
  • Von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ye, X. & Dent, P. (2009). Invariance assumptions among the UK property professionals' decision-making. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 2(1), 56-68.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Lowies, G. A., Hall, J. H., & Cloete, C. E. (2013). The Influence of Frame Dependence on Investment Decisions made by Listed Property Fund Managers in South Africa. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 5(11), 805-814. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v5i11.454

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2013 Gert Abraham Lowies, John Henry Hall, Christiaan Ernst Cloete (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 5 No. 11 (2013) Energy, Management & Behavioural Finance View issue contents

Published

2013-11-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission