Author

  • Muammar Khaddaf

    • Universitas Malikussaleh Lhokseumawe, Indonesia
    • Indonesia
  • Ade Fatma Lubis

    • Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
    • Indonesia
  • Khaira Amalia F

    • Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
    • Indonesia
  • Rahmanta

    • Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
    • Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to examine the moderating role of trading volume activity and cost of equity between earnings aggressiveness and earnings smoothing on return of stock. It includes the analysis of earnings persistent in strengthening the relationship between earnings aggressiveness, earnings smoothing, the cost of equity and trading volume activity as well as their effect on return of stock. The sample of study is 32 banking companies which pay dividends and which shares actively traded at the Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI) whereby the period of observation took place from 2007 to 2011. The method uses a multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS as the data processing tools. The results of this study establish that the earnings aggressiveness and earnings smoothing simultaneously and significantly affect the trading volume activity. The earnings smoothing has a negative effect and is significant on the trading volume activity, while earnings aggressiveness has a positive effect and is significant on the trading volume activity. Meanwhile, the trading volume activity has positive effect and is significant on return of stock and the earnings persistence is moderating the relationship between earnings aggressiveness and earnings smoothing on the trading volume activity.

Keywords

References

  • Altamuro, J., Beatty, A. L. & Weber, J. (2005). The Effects of Accelerated Revenue Recognition on Earnings Management and Earnings Informativeness: Evidence from SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101. The Accounting Review , 80(2), 373 – 401.
  • Ang, R. (1997). Buku Pintar Pasar Modal Indonesia, Ed. 1: Indonesia: Media Soft.
  • Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H. & Landsman, W. R. (2001). The Relevance of the Value Relevance For Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View. Working Paper, Stanford University, January: 1 – 41. Retrieved from: [email protected].
  • Beaver, W. H. (2002). Perspectives on Recent Capital Market Research. The Accounting Review , 77(2), 453 – 474.
  • Bedard, J. C. & Johnstone, K. M. (2004). Earnings Manipulation Risk, Corporate Governance Risk, and Auditors’ Planning and Pricing Decisions. The Accounting Review , 79(2), 277 – 304.
  • Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H. & Welker, M. (2003). The World Price of Earnings Opacity. The Accounting Review , 78(3), 641 – 678.
  • Brajesh, K., Priyanka, S. & Ajay, P. (2010). The Dynamic Relationship between Stock Return, Trading Volume and Volatility: Evidence from Indian Stock Market. Indian Institute of Management. Working Paper. No. 12.
  • Brigham, L. (1983). Fundamentals of Financial Management . 3rd Ed. US: The Dryden Press
  • Chan, K., Chan, L. K. C., Jekadeesh, N. & Lakonishok, J. (2001). Earnings Quality and Stock Returns. Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), May: 1 – 23.
  • Chen, K. C. W. & Yuan, H. (2004). Earnings Management and Capital Resource Allocation: Evidence from China’s Accounting-Based Regulation of Rights Issues. The Accounting Review , 79(3), 645 – 665.
  • Chen, F. L., Gong, M. C. & Oliver, M. R. (2001). Stock Return and Volatility on China’s Stock Market. The Journal of Finance , 24, 523 – 543
  • Chen, Q. & Warfield, T. D. (2005). Equity Incentives and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review , 80(2), 441–476.
  • Dechow, P., Sloan, R. & Sweeney, A. (1995). Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review , 70, 193-225
  • Dechow, P. M. & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors. The Accounting Review , 77, 35 – 59.
  • Easley, D. & O’Hara, M. (2004). Information and the Cost of Capital. The Journal of Finance , 9(4), 1553 – 1583.
  • Eckel, N. (1981). The Income Smoothing Hypotheses Revisited. Abacus, 28 – 40.
  • Ecker, F., Francis, J., Kim, I., Olsson, P. M. & Schipper, K. (2006). A Return-Based Representation of Earnings Quality. The Accounting Review , 81(4), 749 – 780.
  • Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. M. & Schipper, K. (2004). Costs of Equity and Earnings Attributes. The Accounting Review , 79(4), 967 – 1010.
  • Freeman, R., Ohlson, J. & Penman, S. (1982). Book Rate-of-Return and Prediction of Earnings Changes: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Accounting Research , 20, 3 – 42.
  • Ghozali, I. (2005). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS (Multivariate Application Analysis with SPSS Program). Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
  • Guner, G., Asli, Y. & Aydin, Y. (2008). Trading Volume And Stock Market Volatility: Evidence From Emerging Stock Markets. Investment Management and Financial Innovations , 5(4).
  • Husnan, S. (1998). Dasar-Dasar Portofolio dan Analisis Sekuritas (Fundamental of Portfolio Theory and Security Analysis). Yogyakarta: UPP-AMP YKPN.
  • Jones, C. P. (2004). Investments: Analysis and Management. 9th Ed. US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Jogiyanto, P. (1998). Teori portofolio dan analisis Investasi (Portfolio Theory and Investment Analaysis). Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  • Kamath, R. R. (2008). The Price – Volume Relationship in the Chilean Stock Market. International Business & Economics Research Journal , 7(10).
  • Kothari, S. P. (2001). Capital Market Research in Accounting. Journal of Accounting & Economics , 31, 105 – 231.
  • Moses, O. D. (1987). Income Smoothing and Incentive: Empirical Tests Using Accounting Changes. The Accounting Review , 12(2), 358 – 377.
  • Nadia, A. (2011). The Empirical Relationship between stock return and trading volume in Pakistan. Proceedings VENICE.
  • Ohlson, J. A. (2006). A Practical Model of Earnings Measurement. The Accounting Review , 81(1), 271 – 279.
  • Penman, S. H. (2003). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation . 2nd Ed. US: McGraw Hill.
  • Penman, S. H. & Zhang, X. J. (2002). Accounting Conservatism, the Quality of Earnings, and Stock Return. The Accounting Review , 77(2), 237 – 264.
  • Sloan, R. G. (1996). Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flow about Future Earnings? The Accounting Review , 71(3), 289 – 315.
  • Sunarto, P. (2008). Peran Persistensi Laba Memperlemah Hubungan antara Earning Opacity, Cost of Equity dan Trading Volume Activity (The role of earning persistence weakened the relationship between earning opacity, cost of equity and trading volume activity), Desertasi, Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
  • Tucker, J. W. & Zarowin, P. A. (2006). Does Income Smoothing Improve Earnings Informativeness? The Accounting Review , 81(1), 251 – 270.
  • Tarun, C. & Avanidhar, S. (2000). Trading Activity and Expected Stock Returns. Retrieved from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Khaddaf, M., Lubis, A. F., F, K. A., & Rahmanta. (2014). The Effect of Earnings Aggressiveness, Earnings Smoothing on Return of Stock. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 6(6), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v6i6.512

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2014-06-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission