Author

  • Justus N. Agumba

    • University of Johannesburg, South Africa
    • South Africa
  • Theo Haupt

    • University of Kwazulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
    • South Africa

Abstract

The literature on health and safety (H&S) is bound with different elements and indicators of measuring H&S performance. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the success and challenges of using quantitative and qualitative approach of Delphi technique in validating and identifying H&S performance indicators that small and medium construction enterprises (SMEs) can use to measure and monitor their H&S performance improvement at project level. Furthermore, discuss the identification of experts in the field of H&S, ways of improving consensus analysis and minimizing experts’ non-response. This study is based on practical experience of the researchers pertaining to the Delphi technique method which is a constructivist or interpretive approach to knowledge. The study started with an extensive literature review to identify core elements and leading indicators characterizing H&S culture to develop a Delphi questionnaire that was used in the first round of Delphi. A four round Delphi technique was conducted to attain consensus of the identified H&S indicators. The experts were identified from published articles of H&S, practitioners’ website of H&S and word of mouth. The use of email was used as a mode of communication. This study set to warn but also encourage the use of Delphi technique as a method to unearth information in areas where consensus has not been reached such as H&S performance measurement indicators for construction SMEs in South Africa.

Keywords

References

  • Adler, M. & Sainsbury, R. (1996), Alternative approaches to the computerization of social security: reflections on Delphi exercise: In Adler, M and Ziglio, E. (eds.) gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Bertin, G. (1996). Delphi techniques and the planning of social services: the prevention of dependency among the old: In Adler, M and Ziglio, E. (eds.) Gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Campbell, S. M. & Cantrill, J. A. (2001), Consensus methods in prescribing research. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 26(1), 5-14.
  • Cape, B. (2004). Gathering opinion and initiating debate: the success of the Delphi method in purely qualitative research. Library and Information , 28(89), 35-44.
  • Crisp, J., Pelletier, D., Duffield, C., Adams, A. & Nagy, S. (1997). The Delphi method? Nursing Research, 46(2), 116-118.
  • Critcher, C. & Goldstone, B. (1998). Utilizing the Delphi technique in policy discussion: a case study of a privatized utility in Britain. Public Administration, 76(3), 431-449.
  • Drodge, S. (1983). Delphi technique: Some practical considerations. Library and information research news , 6(21), 4-6.
  • Dyer, E. (1979). The Delphi technique in library research. Library research, 1(1), 41-52.
  • Fernandez-muniz, B., Montes-Peon, M. J. & Vazquez-Ordas, J. C. (2007). Safety culture: Analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. Journal of Safety Research , 38(6), 627-641.
  • Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M. & Brook, R. H. (1984). Consensus methods characteristics and guidelines for use. American Journal of Public Health, 74(9), 979-983.
  • Goldschmidt, P. (1996). A comprehensive study of the ethical, legal and social implications of advances in biochemical and behavioral research and technology. In Adler, M and Ziglio, E. (eds.) Gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Hallowell, M. R. (2008). A formal model for construction safety risk management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, U.S.A.
  • Hallowell, R. M. & Gambatese, A. J. (2010). Qualitative research: application of the Delphi method to CEM research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , 136(1), 99-107.
  • Hsu, C. & Sandford, A. B. (2007). Minimizing non-response in the Delphi process: How to respond to nonresponse, Practical assessment, research and evaluation , 12(17), 62-78.
  • James, J. M. & Bolstein, R. (1992). Large monetary incentives and their effect on mail survey response rates. Public opinion quarterly , 56(4), 442-453.
  • Lingard, H. & Rowlison, S. (2005). Occupational Health and Safety in Construction Project Management. Spon Press 2 Park Square, Milton Park Abington, Oxon OX 14 4rn.
  • Linstone, H. & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications, Addison-Wesley publishing company.
  • Ludwig, B. (1994). Predicting the future have you considered using the Delphi methodology? Journal of Extension , 35(5), 1-4.
  • Murray, J. W. & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A Versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423-436.
  • Nichol, J. R. (2007). A framework for the development of Post-graduate Diploma programme in Mental Health. Unpublished PhD thesis, Faculty of Science, University of Free State, South Africa.
  • Okoli, C. & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management , 42(1), 15-29.
  • Rajendran, S. & Gambatese, A. J. (2009). Development and initial validation of sustainable construction safety and health rating system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , 135(10), 10671075.
  • Rajendran, S. (2007), Sustainable Construction Safety and Health Rating System. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Oregon State University, U.S.A
  • Rodgers, M. R. & Lopez, E. C. (2002). Identifying critical cross-cultural school psychology competencies. Journal of School Psychology , 40(2), 115-141.
  • Van Beek, E. (1996). The use of Delphi method in forecasting accidents in the year 2000. In Adler, M and Ziglio, E. (eds.) Gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Ziglio, E. (1996). The Delphi method and its contribution to decision making. In Adler, M and Ziglio, E. (eds.) Gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Agumba, J. N., & Haupt, T. (2015). Validating and Identifying Health and Safety Performance Improvement Indicators: Experience of Using Delphi Technique. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 7(3(J), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v7i3(J).578

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2015-06-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission