Author

  • Leanne L. Manley

    • University of South Africa (UNISA), South Africa
    • South Africa

  • Johannes A. Wiid

    • University of South Africa (UNISA), South Africa
    • South Africa

  • Michael C. Cant

    • University of South Africa (UNISA), South Africa
    • South Africa

Abstract

Counterfeiting of products is an industry that affects many countries worldwide and it is an industry that has grown exponentially in the 21st century, due to the value associated with branded products. It is the demand from individuals that fuels this trade and what will keep the trade growing for years to come. It therefore becomes essential that research be conducted to investigate the attitudes held towards the trade in order to gain a better understanding of the current counterfeit environment. This article aimed to investigate the attitudes that South African small business owners have with regard to counterfeit merchandise. Quantitative research was undertaken by means of a self-administered web-based questionnaire that was e-mailed to individuals that either have an active SME (Small, Medium Enterprise) or individuals that are seeking to start their SME, who reside in the provinces of the Mpumalanga and the Western Cape. The data obtained was then analysed by means of SAS JMP version 11 whereby attitudes held towards counterfeit merchandise were established. The main conclusions emanating from the research, was that South African SMEs generally have a negative attitude towards purchasing counterfeit fashion branded merchandise.

Keywords

References

  • Ang, S. W., Cheng, P. S., Lim, E. A. C. & Tambyah, S. K. (2001). Spot the difference: consumer responses towards counterfeits. Journal of Consumer Marketing , 18(3), 219-235.
  • Bian, X. & Moutinho, L. (2009). An Investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration. Journal of business research , 62, 368–378.
  • Bian, X. & Moutinho, L. (2011). Counterfeits and branded products: effects of counterfeit ownership. Journal of Product and Brand Management , 20(5), 379-393.
  • Bian, X. & Veloutsou, C. (2007). Consumers’ attitudes regarding non-deceptive counterfeit brands in the UK and China. Journal of Brand Management , 4(3), 211-222.
  • Cant, M. C. (2010). Marketing: An Introduction. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
  • De Matos, C. A., Ituassu, C. T. & Rossi, C. A. V. (2007). Consumer attitudes toward counterfeits: a review and extension. Journal of Consumer Marketing , 24(1), 36-47.
  • Eisend, M. & Schuchert-Güler, P. (2006). Explaining counterfeit purchases: a review and preview. Academy of marketing science review , 12, 1-22. Retrieved from http://www.amsreview.org/articles/eisend12-2006.pdf
  • Ergin, E. A. (2010). The rise in the sales of counterfeit brands: the case of the Turkish consumers. African Journal of Business management , 4(10), 2181–2186. Retrieved from http://academicjournals.org/AJBM/PDF/pdf2010/18Aug/ Ergin.pdf
  • Haman, M. (2010). Africa rising to the anti-counterfeit challenge. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice , 5(5), 344–349.
  • Harun, A., Bledram, N. A. A. R., Suki, N. M. & Hussein, Z. (2012). Why customers do not buy counterfeit luxury brands? Understanding the effects of personality, perceived quality and attitude on unwillingness to purchase. Labuan e-Journal of Muamalat and Society , 6, 14-29.
  • Heike, S. (2010). Effects of counterfeits on the image of luxury brands: an empirical study from the consumer perspective. Journal of Brand Management , 18(2), 159–173. Retrieved from http://www.palgravejournals.com/bm/journal/v18/ n2/abs/bm201028a.html
  • International Anti-Counterfeit Coalition (IACC). (n.d.). The truth about counterfeiting. Retrieved from http://www.iacc.org/about-counterfeiting/the-truth-about-counterfeiting.php
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) the world business organisation. (n.d). Global impacts study. Retrieved from http://www.iccwbo.org/Advocacy-Codes-and-Rules/BASCAP/BASCAPResearch/Economic-impact/Global-Impacts-Study/
  • International Trademark Association (INTA). (2014). Fact sheets protecting a trademark. Retrieved from http://www.inta.org/TrademarkBasics/FactSheets/Pages/Counterfeiting.aspx.
  • Juggessur, J. & Cohen, G. (2009). Is fashion promoting counterfeit brands? Brand management , 16 (5/6), 383-394.
  • Kim, H. & Karpova, E. (2010). Consumer attitudes toward fashion counterfeits: application of the theory of planned behaviour. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 28(2), 79-94.
  • Koklic, M. K. (2011). Non-deceptive counterfeiting purchase behaviour: antecedents of attitudes and purchase intentions. The Journal of Applied Business Research , 27(2), 127-138.
  • Lan, M., Lui, F., Fang, C. & Lin, T.M.Y. (2012). Understanding word of mouth counterfeiting. Scientific research: Psychology , 3(3), 289-295.
  • Le Cordeur, K. (2012). The ‘Fake’ epidemic. Retrieved from http://www.leader.co.za/printarticle.aspx?s=41&f=1&a=3321
  • Lee, S. & Workman, J. E. (2011). Attitudes toward counterfeit purchases and ethical beliefs among Korean and American University students. Family & Consumer sciences research journal , 39(3), 289-305.
  • Magwaza, N. (2012). Clothing sector fights surge in counterfeit products entering SA. Retrieved from http://www.iol.co.za/business/business-news/clothing-sector-fights-surge-in-counterfeit-productsentering-sa-1.1401407
  • Maldonado, C. & Hume, E. C. (2005). Attitudes towards counterfeit products: An ethical perspective. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues , 8(2), 105-117.
  • Meissner, R. (2010). The trade in counterfeit goods: What is it, why is it a problem and what is its impact on Africa. Retrieved from http://www.polity.org.za/ article/the-trade-in-counterfeit-goods-what-is-itwhy-is-it-a-problem-and-what-is-its-impact-on-africa-2010-08-04
  • Mir, I. A. (2011). Impact of the word of mouth on consumers’ attitude towards the non-deceptive counterfeits. Middle-East Journal of scientific research , 9 (1), 51-56.
  • Nellis, C. (2011). Faking it: Counterfeit fashion. Retrieved from http://fashion.about.com/cs/tipsadvice/a/fakingit.htm
  • News24. (2011). Counterfeit industry grows, tops R360bn. Retrieved from http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/Politics/Counterfeit-industry-grows-tops-R360bn-20111003
  • O’Cass, A. & Frost, H. (2002). Status brands: examining the effects of non-product-related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product and Brand Management , 11(2), 67-88. Retrieved from http://www. emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=857780&show=abstract
  • Penz, E. & Ströttinger, B. (2005). Forget the “Real” thing-take the copy! An explanatory model for the volitional purchase of counterfeit products. Advances in Consumer Research , 32, 568-575.
  • Phau, I., Sequeira, M. & Dix, S. (2009). Consumers’ willingness to knowingly purchase counterfeit products. Direct Marketing: An International Journal , 3(4), 262-281.
  • Phau, I. & Teah, M. (2009). Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: a study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing , 26(1), 15-27.
  • Phau, I., Teah, M. & Lee, A. (2009). Targeting buyers of counterfeits of luxury brands: a study on attitudes of Singaporean consumers. J ournal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(1), 3-15.
  • Ramara, P. & Lamont, M. (2012). Counterfeiting – the perceived victimless crime. Retrieved from http://www.spoor.com/home/index.php?ipkMenuID=&ipkArticleID=404
  • Riquelme, H. E., Abbas, E. M. S. & Rios, R. E. (2012). Intention to purchase fake products in an Islamic country. Education, Business and society contemporary Middle Eastern Issues , 5(1), 6-22.
  • Sharma, P. & Chan, R. Y. K. (2011). Counterfeit proneness: Conceptualisation and scale development. Journal of Marketing managemen t, 27(5-6), 602-626.
  • South African Institute of Intellectual Property Law (SAIIPL). (n.d.). Anti-counterfeiting. Retrieved from http://www.saiipl.org.za/introip/76-anticounterfeiting
  • Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2009). Faking it: personality and individual difference predictors of willingness to buy counterfeit goods. The journal of Socio-Economics , 38, 820-825.
  • Teah, M. & Phau, I. (2001). Attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands: the Singapore story. Journal of Advertising , 1, 1–8. Retrieved from http:// anzmac.info/conference/2008/Proceedings /PDF/S05/Teah%20%26%20Phau% 20S8%20PS%20P1.pdf
  • Turunen, L. L. M. & Laaksonen, P. (2011). Diffusing the boundaries between luxury and counterfeits. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 20(6), 468–474. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid= 1954076
  • Vida, I. (2007). Determinants of consumer willingness to purchase non-deceptive counterfeit products. Managing global transitions , 5(3), 253-270.
  • Yoo, B. & Lee, S. (2009). Buy genuine luxury fashion products or counterfeits? Journal of Advances in consumer research , 36, 280–286. Retrieved from http://people.hofstra.edu/Boonghee_Yoo /papers/2009_acr_counterfeits.pdf
  • Yoo, B. & Lee, S. (2012). Asymmetrical effects of past experiences with genuine fashion luxury brands and their counterfeits on purchase intention of each. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1507-1515.
  • Zhang, J., Hong, L. J. & Zhang, R. Q. (2012). Fighting strategies in a market with counterfeits. Ann Opera Res , 192, 49-66.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Manley, L. L., Wiid, J. A., & Cant, M. C. (2015). Attitudes of Small Business Owners towards Counterfeit Merchandise: Ethics or Survival? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 7(4(J), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v7i4(J).593

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Leanne L. Manley, Johannes A. Wiid, Michael C. Cant (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 7 No. 4(J) (2015) Strategy, Tourism & Cross-Cultural Business View issue contents

Published

2015-08-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission