Environmental Uncertainty and Supply Chain Resilience among Manufacturing Firms in Uganda: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Innovativeness

Wilbroad Aryatwijuka; Henry Mutebi; Ronald Twongyirwe; Naster Tumebembeire; Miriam Tugiramasiko; Atwine Aquilionus; Hassan Musoke

doi:10.22610/jebs.v18i2(J).4842

Author

Wilbroad Aryatwijuka
- Department of Procurement and Marketing, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
- Uganda
Henry Mutebi
- Department of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Makerere University Business School, Kampala, Uganda
- Uganda
Ronald Twongyirwe
- Department of Environment and Livelihoods Support Systems, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
- Uganda
Naster Tumebembeire
- Department of Accounting and Finance, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
- Uganda
Miriam Tugiramasiko
- Department of Human Resource Management, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
- Uganda
Atwine Aquilionus
- Department of Procurement and Marketing, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
- Uganda
Hassan Musoke
- Department of Marketing and Management, Makerere University Business School, Mbarara Campus, Uganda
- Uganda

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between environmental uncertainty (EU), supply chain innovativeness (SCI), and supply chain resilience (SCRE) among manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Uganda. Specifically, it investigates the mediating role of supply chain innovativeness in the relationship between environmental uncertainty and supply chain resilience. A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted using structured questionnaires administered to 400 manufacturing SMEs located in Kampala, Wakiso, Mukono, and Jinja districts. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4. The results reveal that environmental uncertainty positively influences both supply chain resilience and supply chain innovativeness. Supply chain innovativeness also exerts a significant positive effect on supply chain resilience and partially mediates the relationship between environmental uncertainty and supply chain resilience. These findings suggest that manufacturing SMEs enhance resilience by developing innovative capabilities that enable them to anticipate, adapt to, and recover from environmental disruptions. The cross-sectional design limits causal inference and the ability to capture resilience development over time. Future studies should employ longitudinal or mixed-methods approaches to examine the dynamic processes through which firms build resilience under environmental uncertainty. Manufacturing SMEs should strengthen innovation capabilities by investing in flexible production systems, digital technologies, collaborative relationships, and continuous product and process innovation to improve resilience against supply chain disruptions. This study contributes to the supply chain resilience literature by integrating Resource-Based Theory and Dynamic Capability Theory to explain how supply chain innovativeness transforms environmental uncertainty into resilience.

Keywords

References

Akgün, A. E., & Keskin, H. (2014). Organizational resilience capacity and firm product innovativeness and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 52(23), 6918–6937. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.910624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.910624
Al-Hakimi, M. A., & Borade, D. B. (2020). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on supply chain resilience. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), Article 1847990. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1847990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1847990
Al-Hakimi, M. A., Borade, D. B., Saleh, M. H., Mohsen, A., & Nasr, A. (2022). The moderating role of supplier relationship on the effect of postponement on supply chain resilience under different levels of environmental uncertainty. Production & Manufacturing Research, 10(1), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2022.2089264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2022.2089264
Ali, A., Krapfel, R., Jr., & LaBahn, D. (1995). Product innovativeness and entry strategy: Impact on cycle time and break-even time. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1210054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.t01-1-1210030
Ali, I., & Gölgeci, I. (2019). Where is supply chain resilience research heading? A systematic and co-occurrence analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(8), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2019-0038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2019-0038
Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379603300204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379603300205
Aslam, H., & Azhar, T. M. (2018). Dynamic capabilities and performance: A supply chain perspective. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12(1), 198–213.
Ate?, M. A., Suurmond, R., Luzzini, D., & Krause, D. R. (2022). Order from chaos: A meta-analysis of supply chain complexity and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 58(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12264
Bae, H. S. (2017). Empirical relationships of perceived environmental uncertainty, supply chain collaboration and operational performance: Analyses of direct, indirect and total effects. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.12.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.12.010
Bag, S., & Rahman, M. S. (2023). The role of capabilities in shaping sustainable supply chain flexibility and enhancing circular economy-target performance: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28(1), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2021-0344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-05-2021-0246
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.008
Cepeda-Carrion, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Cillo, V. (2019). Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0322
Cho, Y. S., & Linderman, K. (2020). Resource-based product and process innovation model: Theory development and empirical validation. Sustainability, 12(3), 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030913
Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. (2016). Supply chain readiness, response, and recovery for resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(6), 709–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2015-0463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2015-0463
Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. (2017). Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 188, 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.020
Chowdhury, M. M. H., Quaddus, M., & Agarwal, R. (2019). Supply chain resilience for performance: Role of relational practices and network complexities. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(5), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0332
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Danneels, E., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2001). Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(6), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1860357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1860357
Davis, T. (1993). Effective supply chain management. Sloan Management Review, 34(4), 35–46.
Dickens, J. M., Uvet, H., Anderson, J. R., Ponomarov, S. Y., & Nowicki, D. R. (2024). An empirical examination of firm innovativeness and supply chain resilience: The role of information sharing from a dynamic capabilities perspective. Knowledge and Process Management, 31(4), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1785
Ivanov, D. (2023). Introduction to supply chain resilience: Management, modelling, technology and analytics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31368-8
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021). Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820
Eckstein, D., Goellner, M., Blome, C., & Henke, M. (2015). The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: The moderating effect of product complexity. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 3028–3046. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.970707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.970707
Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
Fan, Y., & Stevenson, M. (2019). Non-linear effects of relational capital on supply-side resilience: The moderating role of boundary spanners' personal ties. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(9/10), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2018-0453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2018-0530
Fynes, B., De Búrca, S., & Marshall, D. (2004). Environmental uncertainty, supply chain relationship quality and performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10(4–5), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2004.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2004.11.003
Galetsi, P., Katsaliaki, K., & Kumar, S. (2020). Big data analytics in the health sector: Theoretical framework, techniques, and prospects. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.003
Gligor, D. M., Esmark, C. L., & Holcomb, M. C. (2015). Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile? Journal of Operations Management, 33–34, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.008
Gligor, D. M., & Holcomb, M. C. (2012). Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 438–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211246593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211246594
Gölgeci, I., & Kuivalainen, O. (2020). Does social capital matter for supply chain resilience? The role of absorptive capacity and marketing–supply chain management alignment. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.006
Guan, W., et al. (2020). Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. New England Journal of Medicine, 382, 1708-1720. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why are some new products more successful than others? Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.3.362.18861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.3.362.18861
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Iddris, F. (2016). Measurement of innovation capability in supply chain: An exploratory study. International Journal of Innovation Science, 8(4), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIIS-09-2016-0038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-07-2016-0015
International Trade Centre. (2020). COVID-19: The Great Lockdown and its impact on small businesses. International Trade Centre.
Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining sample size (Fact Sheet PEOD-6). University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences.
Jabnoun, N., Khalifah, A., & Yusuf, A. (2003). Environmental uncertainty, strategic orientation, and quality management: A contingency model. Quality Management Journal, 10(4), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2003.11919079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2003.11919081
Jangga, R., Ali, N. M., Ismail, M., & Sahari, N. (2015). Effect of environmental uncertainty and supply chain flexibility towards supply chain innovation: An exploratory study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01198-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01228-9
Kalyar, M. N., Shafique, I., & Ahmad, B. (2020). Effect of innovativeness on supply chain integration and performance: Investigating the moderating role of environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15(2), 362–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-09-2018-0489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-09-2018-0486
Katsaliaki, K., Galetsi, P., & Kumar, S. (2022). Supply chain disruptions and resilience: A major review and future research agenda. Annals of Operations Research, 319(1), 965–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03912-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03912-1
Kitchell, S. (1997). CEO characteristics and technological innovativeness: A Canadian perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1997.tb00124.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1997.tb00123.x
Koch, T., & Windsperger, J. (2017). Seeing through the network: Competitive advantage in the digital economy. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-017-0016-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-017-0016-z
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.2015100101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Ksoll, C., Macchiavello, R., & Morjaria, A. (2023). Electoral violence and supply chain disruptions in Kenya's floriculture industry. Review of Economics and Statistics, 105(6), 1335–1351. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01185
Kumar, S., & Anbanandam, R. (2020). Impact of risk management culture on supply chain resilience: An empirical study from the Indian manufacturing industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 234(2), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X19886718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X19886718
Kwak, D.-W., Seo, Y.-J., & Mason, R. (2018). Investigating the relationship between supply chain innovation, risk management capabilities, and competitive advantage in global supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0390
Li, C., Sampene, A. K., Khan, A., & Wiredu, J. (2025). Environmental orientations to innovation ecosystem: The role of green transition, perceived environmental uncertainty, and green transformational leadership. Operations Management Research, 18(1), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-024-00513-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-024-00527-8
Li, Y., & Zobel, C. W. (2020). Exploring supply chain network resilience in the presence of the ripple effect. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, Article 107693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107693
Li, Y., Zobel, C. W., Seref, O., & Chatfield, D. (2020). Network characteristics and supply chain resilience under conditions of risk propagation. International Journal of Production Economics, 223, Article 107529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107529
Lv, W.-D., Tian, D., Wei, Y., & Xi, R.-X. (2018). Innovation resilience: A new approach for managing uncertainties concerned with sustainable innovation. Sustainability, 10(10), Article 3641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103641
Mandal, S., Sarathy, R., Korasiga, V. R., Bhattacharya, S., & Dastidar, S. G. (2016). Achieving supply chain resilience: The contribution of logistics and supply chain capabilities. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7(5), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-04-2016-0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-04-2016-0010
Mashiloane, M. W., Mafini, C., & Pooe, R. D. I. (2018). Supply chain dynamism, information sharing, inter-organizational relationships, and supply chain performance in the manufacturing sector. Acta Commercii, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v18i1.547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v18i1.547
Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. A. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information & Management, 57(2), Article 103169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.004
Min, H. (2019). Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience. Business Horizons, 62(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.012
Muhwezi, M., Mutebi, H., Mayanja, S. S., Tukamuhabwa, B., Namagembe, S., & Kalema, R. (2023). Information integration, procurement internal controls, material and purchasing procedure standardization, and procurement performance in humanitarian organizations. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 13(4), 410–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-08-2022-0085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-11-2021-0115
Munir, M., Jajja, M. S. S., Chatha, K. A., & Farooq, S. (2020). Supply chain risk management and operational performance: The enabling role of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, Article 107667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107667
Negri, M., Cagno, E., Colicchia, C., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 2858–2886. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2776
Parast, M. M. (2020). The impact of R&D investment on mitigating supply chain disruptions: Empirical evidence from US firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, Article 107671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107671
Peng, L., Ding, D., Wang, D., et al. (2020). Global supply-chain effects of COVID-19 control measures. Nature Human Behavior, 4(6), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0896-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0896-8
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Ponomarov, S. Y. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of supply chain resilience: A dynamic capabilities perspective (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee).
Ramón-Jerónimo, J. M., Flórez-López, R., & Araújo-Pinzón, P. (2019). Resource-based view and SMEs' performance exporting through foreign intermediaries: The mediating effect of management controls. Sustainability, 11(12), Article 3241. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123241
Rha, J. S. (2020). Trends of research on supply chain resilience: A systematic review using network analysis. Sustainability, 12(11), Article 4343. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114343
Sabahi, S., & Parast, M. M. (2020). Firm innovation and supply chain resilience: A dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1683522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1683522
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
Saunila, M., & Ukko, J. (2012). A conceptual framework for the measurement of innovation capability and its effects. Baltic Journal of Management, 7(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261211272139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261211272139
Scholten, K., & Schilder, S. (2015). The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2014-0386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2014-0386
Scholten, K., Sharkey Scott, P., & Fynes, B. (2014). Mitigation processes—Antecedents for building supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2013-0191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2013-0191
Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2019). Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125, 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001
Shafi, M., Liu, J., & Ren, W. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises operating in Pakistan. Research in Globalization, 2, Article 100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100018
Siagian, H., Tarigan, Z. J. H., & Jie, F. (2021). Supply chain integration enables resilience, flexibility, and innovation to improve business performance in the COVID-19 era. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 4669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094669
Singh, C. S., Soni, G., & Badhotiya, G. K. (2019). Performance indicators for supply chain resilience: Review and conceptual framework. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15(Suppl. 1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-019-00322-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-019-00322-2
Singh, R. K. (2020). Modelling the critical barriers to the implementation of supply chain risk management: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(6), 632–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1707845
Singh, N. P. (2020). Managing environmental uncertainty for improved firm financial performance: The moderating role of supply chain risk management practices on managerial decision making. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(3), 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1684465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1684462
Srinivasan, R., & Swink, M. (2018). An investigation of visibility and flexibility as complements to supply chain analytics: An organizational information processing theory perspective. Production and Operations Management, 27(10), 1849–1867. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12746
Sunil, K. (2019). Supply chain innovation: The core capabilities required and expected outcomes. Journal of Information Technology & Software Engineering, 9(2), 256–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35248/2165-7866.19.9.256
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tukamuhabwa, B., Stevenson, M., & Busby, J. (2017). Supply chain resilience in a developing country context: A case study on the interconnectedness of threats, strategies, and outcomes. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(6), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2017-0059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2017-0059
Tukamuhabwa, B. R., Stevenson, M., Busby, J., & Zorzini, M. (2015). Supply chain resilience: Definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study. International Journal of Production Research, 53(18), 5592–5623. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1037934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1037934
Uganda Bureau of Statistics. (2025). Statistical abstract 2025. Uganda Bureau of Statistics.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trade and development: Transitioning to a new normal. United Nations.
Vanpoucke, E., & Ellis, S. C. (2020). Building supply-side resilience: A behavioral view. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2019-0306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2017-0562
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056
Wang, H., Chen, Y., Xie, J., & Liu, C. (2025). Research on digital empowerment, innovation vitality and manufacturing supply chain resilience mechanism. PLOS ONE, 20(2), e0319943. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316183
Wang, L., Zeng, Y., Xu, Y., Chi, M., & Wu, H. (2025). The effect of blockchain on construction supply chain resilience: A mediated moderation model. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 16(2), Article 103253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.103253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.103253
Wang, Y., Iqbal, U., & Gong, Y. (2021). The performance of resilient supply chain sustainability during COVID-19 through sourcing and technological integration. Sustainability, 13(11), Article 6151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116151
Whiteside, J., & Dani, S. (2020). Influence of organizational culture on supply chain resilience: A power and situational strength conceptual perspective. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(7), Article 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13070147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13070147
Wieland, A., & Durach, C. F. (2021). Two perspectives on supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 42(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12271
World Trade Organization. (2021). World trade report 2021: Economic resilience and trade. World Trade Organization. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30875/6c551ba0-en
Wzi?tek-Kubiak, A., & P?czkowski, M. (2021). Strengthening the innovation resilience of Polish manufacturing firms in unstable environments. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 716–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00645-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00725-w
Xu, S., Zhang, X., Feng, L., & Yang, W. (2020). Disruption risks in supply chain management: A literature review based on bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), 3508–3526. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1717011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1717011
Yu, Y., Xu, L., & Wen, X. (2025). The impact of digital transformation on supply chain resilience in manufacturing: The mediating role of supply chain integration. Sustainability, 17(9), Article 3873. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093873
Zavala-Alcívar, A., Verdecho, M.-J., & Alfaro-Saiz, J.-J. (2020). A conceptual framework to manage resilience and increase sustainability in the supply chain. Sustainability, 12(16), Article 6300. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166300
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/651257

Downloads

Full-text downloads recorded for this article, by month.

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Aryatwijuka, W., Mutebi, H., Twongyirwe, R., Tumebembeire, N., Tugiramasiko, M., Aquilionus, A., & Musoke, H. (2026). Environmental Uncertainty and Supply Chain Resilience among Manufacturing Firms in Uganda: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Innovativeness. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 18(2(J), 42-62. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v18i2(J).4842

Share this article

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Environmental Uncertainty and Supply Chain Resilience among Manufacturing Firms in Uganda: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Innovativeness

Download the full text

Author

Abstract

Keywords

References

Downloads

How to Cite

Share this article

License

Keywords

Section

Published in

Published

Submissions