Author

  • Wilbroad Aryatwijuka

    • Department of Procurement and Marketing, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
    • Uganda

  • Henry Mutebi

    • Department of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Makerere University Business School, Kampala, Uganda
    • Uganda

  • Ronald Twongyirwe

    • Department of Environment and Livelihoods Support Systems, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
    • Uganda

  • Naster Tumebembeire

    • Department of Accounting and Finance, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
    • Uganda

  • Miriam Tugiramasiko

    • Department of Human Resource Management, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
    • Uganda

  • Atwine Aquilionus

    • Department of Procurement and Marketing, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
    • Uganda

  • Hassan Musoke

    • Department of Marketing and Management, Makerere University Business School, Mbarara Campus, Uganda
    • Uganda

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between environmental uncertainty (EU), supply chain innovativeness (SCI), and supply chain resilience (SCRE) among manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Uganda. Specifically, it investigates the mediating role of supply chain innovativeness in the relationship between environmental uncertainty and supply chain resilience. A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted using structured questionnaires administered to 400 manufacturing SMEs located in Kampala, Wakiso, Mukono, and Jinja districts. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4. The results reveal that environmental uncertainty positively influences both supply chain resilience and supply chain innovativeness. Supply chain innovativeness also exerts a significant positive effect on supply chain resilience and partially mediates the relationship between environmental uncertainty and supply chain resilience. These findings suggest that manufacturing SMEs enhance resilience by developing innovative capabilities that enable them to anticipate, adapt to, and recover from environmental disruptions. The cross-sectional design limits causal inference and the ability to capture resilience development over time. Future studies should employ longitudinal or mixed-methods approaches to examine the dynamic processes through which firms build resilience under environmental uncertainty. Manufacturing SMEs should strengthen innovation capabilities by investing in flexible production systems, digital technologies, collaborative relationships, and continuous product and process innovation to improve resilience against supply chain disruptions. This study contributes to the supply chain resilience literature by integrating Resource-Based Theory and Dynamic Capability Theory to explain how supply chain innovativeness transforms environmental uncertainty into resilience.

Keywords

References

  • Akgün, A. E., & Keskin, H. (2014). Organizational resilience capacity and firm product innovativeness and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 52(23), 6918–6937. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.910624
  • Al-Hakimi, M. A., & Borade, D. B. (2020). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on supply chain resilience. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), Article 1847990. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1847990
  • Al-Hakimi, M. A., Borade, D. B., Saleh, M. H., Mohsen, A., & Nasr, A. (2022). The moderating role of supplier relationship on the effect of postponement on supply chain resilience under different levels of environmental uncertainty. Production & Manufacturing Research, 10(1), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2022.2089264
  • Ali, A., Krapfel, R., Jr., & LaBahn, D. (1995). Product innovativeness and entry strategy: Impact on cycle time and break-even time. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1210054
  • Ali, I., & Gölgeci, I. (2019). Where is supply chain resilience research heading? A systematic and co-occurrence analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(8), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2019-0038
  • Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379603300204
  • Aslam, H., & Azhar, T. M. (2018). Dynamic capabilities and performance: A supply chain perspective. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12(1), 198–213.
  • Ate?, M. A., Suurmond, R., Luzzini, D., & Krause, D. R. (2022). Order from chaos: A meta-analysis of supply chain complexity and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 58(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12264
  • Bae, H. S. (2017). Empirical relationships of perceived environmental uncertainty, supply chain collaboration and operational performance: Analyses of direct, indirect and total effects. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.12.012
  • Bag, S., & Rahman, M. S. (2023). The role of capabilities in shaping sustainable supply chain flexibility and enhancing circular economy-target performance: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28(1), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2021-0344
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
  • Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.008
  • Cepeda-Carrion, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Cillo, V. (2019). Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0322
  • Cho, Y. S., & Linderman, K. (2020). Resource-based product and process innovation model: Theory development and empirical validation. Sustainability, 12(3), 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030913
  • Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. (2016). Supply chain readiness, response, and recovery for resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(6), 709–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2015-0463
  • Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. (2017). Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 188, 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.020
  • Chowdhury, M. M. H., Quaddus, M., & Agarwal, R. (2019). Supply chain resilience for performance: Role of relational practices and network complexities. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(5), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0332
  • Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Danneels, E., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2001). Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(6), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1860357
  • Davis, T. (1993). Effective supply chain management. Sloan Management Review, 34(4), 35–46.
  • Dickens, J. M., Uvet, H., Anderson, J. R., Ponomarov, S. Y., & Nowicki, D. R. (2024). An empirical examination of firm innovativeness and supply chain resilience: The role of information sharing from a dynamic capabilities perspective. Knowledge and Process Management, 31(4), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1807
  • Ivanov, D. (2023). Introduction to supply chain resilience: Management, modelling, technology and analytics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31368-8
  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021). Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820
  • Eckstein, D., Goellner, M., Blome, C., & Henke, M. (2015). The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: The moderating effect of product complexity. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 3028–3046. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.970707
  • Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
  • Fan, Y., & Stevenson, M. (2019). Non-linear effects of relational capital on supply-side resilience: The moderating role of boundary spanners' personal ties. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(9/10), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2018-0453
  • Fynes, B., De Búrca, S., & Marshall, D. (2004). Environmental uncertainty, supply chain relationship quality and performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10(4–5), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2004.11.003
  • Galetsi, P., Katsaliaki, K., & Kumar, S. (2020). Big data analytics in the health sector: Theoretical framework, techniques, and prospects. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.003
  • Gligor, D. M., Esmark, C. L., & Holcomb, M. C. (2015). Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile? Journal of Operations Management, 33–34, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.008
  • Gligor, D. M., & Holcomb, M. C. (2012). Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 438–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211246593
  • Gölgeci, I., & Kuivalainen, O. (2020). Does social capital matter for supply chain resilience? The role of absorptive capacity and marketing–supply chain management alignment. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.006
  • Guan, W., et al. (2020). Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. New England Journal of Medicine, 382, 1708-1720. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why are some new products more successful than others? Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.3.362.18861
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Iddris, F. (2016). Measurement of innovation capability in supply chain: An exploratory study. International Journal of Innovation Science, 8(4), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIIS-09-2016-0038
  • International Trade Centre. (2020). COVID-19: The Great Lockdown and its impact on small businesses. International Trade Centre.
  • Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining sample size (Fact Sheet PEOD-6). University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences.
  • Jabnoun, N., Khalifah, A., & Yusuf, A. (2003). Environmental uncertainty, strategic orientation, and quality management: A contingency model. Quality Management Journal, 10(4), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2003.11919079
  • Jangga, R., Ali, N. M., Ismail, M., & Sahari, N. (2015). Effect of environmental uncertainty and supply chain flexibility towards supply chain innovation: An exploratory study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01198-6
  • Kalyar, M. N., Shafique, I., & Ahmad, B. (2020). Effect of innovativeness on supply chain integration and performance: Investigating the moderating role of environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15(2), 362–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-09-2018-0489
  • Katsaliaki, K., Galetsi, P., & Kumar, S. (2022). Supply chain disruptions and resilience: A major review and future research agenda. Annals of Operations Research, 319(1), 965–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03912-1
  • Kitchell, S. (1997). CEO characteristics and technological innovativeness: A Canadian perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1997.tb00124.x
  • Koch, T., & Windsperger, J. (2017). Seeing through the network: Competitive advantage in the digital economy. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-017-0016-z
  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.2015100101
  • Ksoll, C., Macchiavello, R., & Morjaria, A. (2023). Electoral violence and supply chain disruptions in Kenya's floriculture industry. Review of Economics and Statistics, 105(6), 1335–1351. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01123
  • Kumar, S., & Anbanandam, R. (2020). Impact of risk management culture on supply chain resilience: An empirical study from the Indian manufacturing industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 234(2), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X19886718
  • Kwak, D.-W., Seo, Y.-J., & Mason, R. (2018). Investigating the relationship between supply chain innovation, risk management capabilities, and competitive advantage in global supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0390
  • Li, C., Sampene, A. K., Khan, A., & Wiredu, J. (2025). Environmental orientations to innovation ecosystem: The role of green transition, perceived environmental uncertainty, and green transformational leadership. Operations Management Research, 18(1), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-024-00513-0
  • Li, Y., & Zobel, C. W. (2020). Exploring supply chain network resilience in the presence of the ripple effect. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, Article 107693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107693
  • Li, Y., Zobel, C. W., Seref, O., & Chatfield, D. (2020). Network characteristics and supply chain resilience under conditions of risk propagation. International Journal of Production Economics, 223, Article 107529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107529
  • Lv, W.-D., Tian, D., Wei, Y., & Xi, R.-X. (2018). Innovation resilience: A new approach for managing uncertainties concerned with sustainable innovation. Sustainability, 10(10), Article 3641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103641
  • Mandal, S., Sarathy, R., Korasiga, V. R., Bhattacharya, S., & Dastidar, S. G. (2016). Achieving supply chain resilience: The contribution of logistics and supply chain capabilities. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7(5), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-04-2016-0010
  • Mashiloane, M. W., Mafini, C., & Pooe, R. D. I. (2018). Supply chain dynamism, information sharing, inter-organizational relationships, and supply chain performance in the manufacturing sector. Acta Commercii, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v18i1.547
  • Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. A. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information & Management, 57(2), Article 103169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103169
  • Min, H. (2019). Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience. Business Horizons, 62(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.012
  • Muhwezi, M., Mutebi, H., Mayanja, S. S., Tukamuhabwa, B., Namagembe, S., & Kalema, R. (2023). Information integration, procurement internal controls, material and purchasing procedure standardization, and procurement performance in humanitarian organizations. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 13(4), 410–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-08-2022-0085
  • Munir, M., Jajja, M. S. S., Chatha, K. A., & Farooq, S. (2020). Supply chain risk management and operational performance: The enabling role of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, Article 107667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107667
  • Negri, M., Cagno, E., Colicchia, C., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 2858–2886. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2776
  • Parast, M. M. (2020). The impact of R&D investment on mitigating supply chain disruptions: Empirical evidence from US firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, Article 107671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107671
  • Peng, L., Ding, D., Wang, D., et al. (2020). Global supply-chain effects of COVID-19 control measures. Nature Human Behavior, 4(6), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0896-8
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Ponomarov, S. Y. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of supply chain resilience: A dynamic capabilities perspective (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee).
  • Ramón-Jerónimo, J. M., Flórez-López, R., & Araújo-Pinzón, P. (2019). Resource-based view and SMEs' performance exporting through foreign intermediaries: The mediating effect of management controls. Sustainability, 11(12), Article 3241. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123241
  • Rha, J. S. (2020). Trends of research on supply chain resilience: A systematic review using network analysis. Sustainability, 12(11), Article 4343. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114343
  • Sabahi, S., & Parast, M. M. (2020). Firm innovation and supply chain resilience: A dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1683522
  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
  • Saunila, M., & Ukko, J. (2012). A conceptual framework for the measurement of innovation capability and its effects. Baltic Journal of Management, 7(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261211272139
  • Scholten, K., & Schilder, S. (2015). The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2014-0386
  • Scholten, K., Sharkey Scott, P., & Fynes, B. (2014). Mitigation processes—Antecedents for building supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2013-0191
  • Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2019). Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125, 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001
  • Shafi, M., Liu, J., & Ren, W. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises operating in Pakistan. Research in Globalization, 2, Article 100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100018
  • Siagian, H., Tarigan, Z. J. H., & Jie, F. (2021). Supply chain integration enables resilience, flexibility, and innovation to improve business performance in the COVID-19 era. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 4669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094669
  • Singh, C. S., Soni, G., & Badhotiya, G. K. (2019). Performance indicators for supply chain resilience: Review and conceptual framework. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15(Suppl. 1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-019-00322-2
  • Singh, R. K. (2020). Modelling the critical barriers to the implementation of supply chain risk management: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(6), 632–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1707845
  • Singh, N. P. (2020). Managing environmental uncertainty for improved firm financial performance: The moderating role of supply chain risk management practices on managerial decision making. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(3), 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1684465
  • Srinivasan, R., & Swink, M. (2018). An investigation of visibility and flexibility as complements to supply chain analytics: An organizational information processing theory perspective. Production and Operations Management, 27(10), 1849–1867. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12746
  • Sunil, K. (2019). Supply chain innovation: The core capabilities required and expected outcomes. Journal of Information Technology & Software Engineering, 9(2), 256–271.
  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  • Tukamuhabwa, B., Stevenson, M., & Busby, J. (2017). Supply chain resilience in a developing country context: A case study on the interconnectedness of threats, strategies, and outcomes. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(6), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2017-0059
  • Tukamuhabwa, B. R., Stevenson, M., Busby, J., & Zorzini, M. (2015). Supply chain resilience: Definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study. International Journal of Production Research, 53(18), 5592–5623. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1037934
  • Uganda Bureau of Statistics. (2025). Statistical abstract 2025. Uganda Bureau of Statistics.
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trade and development: Transitioning to a new normal. United Nations.
  • Vanpoucke, E., & Ellis, S. C. (2020). Building supply-side resilience: A behavioral view. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2019-0306
  • Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056
  • Wang, H., Chen, Y., Xie, J., & Liu, C. (2025). Research on digital empowerment, innovation vitality and manufacturing supply chain resilience mechanism. PLOS ONE, 20(2), e0319943. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319943
  • Wang, L., Zeng, Y., Xu, Y., Chi, M., & Wu, H. (2025). The effect of blockchain on construction supply chain resilience: A mediated moderation model. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 16(2), Article 103253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.103253
  • Wang, Y., Iqbal, U., & Gong, Y. (2021). The performance of resilient supply chain sustainability during COVID-19 through sourcing and technological integration. Sustainability, 13(11), Article 6151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116151
  • Whiteside, J., & Dani, S. (2020). Influence of organizational culture on supply chain resilience: A power and situational strength conceptual perspective. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(7), Article 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13070147
  • Wieland, A., & Durach, C. F. (2021). Two perspectives on supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 42(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12271
  • World Trade Organization. (2021). World trade report 2021: Economic resilience and trade. World Trade Organization.
  • Wzi?tek-Kubiak, A., & P?czkowski, M. (2021). Strengthening the innovation resilience of Polish manufacturing firms in unstable environments. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 716–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00645-4
  • Xu, S., Zhang, X., Feng, L., & Yang, W. (2020). Disruption risks in supply chain management: A literature review based on bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), 3508–3526. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1717011
  • Yu, Y., Xu, L., & Wen, X. (2025). The impact of digital transformation on supply chain resilience in manufacturing: The mediating role of supply chain integration. Sustainability, 17(9), Article 3873. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093873
  • Zavala-Alcívar, A., Verdecho, M.-J., & Alfaro-Saiz, J.-J. (2020). A conceptual framework to manage resilience and increase sustainability in the supply chain. Sustainability, 12(16), Article 6300. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166300
  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257

Downloads

Full-text downloads recorded for this article, by month.

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Aryatwijuka, W., Mutebi, H., Twongyirwe, R., Tumebembeire, N., Tugiramasiko, M., Aquilionus, A., & Musoke, H. (2026). Environmental Uncertainty and Supply Chain Resilience among Manufacturing Firms in Uganda: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Innovativeness. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 18(2(J), 42-62. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v18i2(J).4842

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Wilbroad Aryatwijuka, Henry Mutebi, Ronald Twongyirwe, Naster Tumebembeire, Miriam Tugiramasiko, Atwine Aquilionus, Hassan Musoke (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 18 No. 2(J) (2026) Retail, Trade & Workplace Well-Being View issue contents

Published

2026-07-07

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission