Corresponding Author

  • Phiona Natuha

    • Makerere University Business School, Kampala
    • Uganda

Author

  • Onesmo Selejio

    • University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam
    • Tanzania, United Republic of

  • Aloyce S Hepelwa

    • University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam
    • Tanzania, United Republic of

Abstract

This study examines technical efficiency (TE) and identifies determinants of inefficiency among smallholder Robusta and Arabica coffee farmers in Uganda while quantifying yield losses associated with inefficiency. The study utilized pooled cross-sectional data from 1,283 smallholder coffee farmers drawn from three survey waves (2015/2016, 2018/2019 and 2019/2020) of the Uganda National Panel Survey (UNPS). A one-step Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) with a translog production frontier is applied to jointly estimate technical efficiency and its determinants. The approach further quantifies yield losses attributable to inefficiency, disaggregated by coffee farmer type. Mean technical efficiency is 76.5 percent for Robusta and 73.1 percent for Arabica, implying potential output gains of 23.5 percent and 26.9 percent, respectively, using existing inputs. Efficiency variations are associated with group membership, off-farm income, cropping systems, soil type, and plot proximity, with effects differing by coffee type. Yield losses due to inefficiency averaged 113.0 kilograms for Robusta and 138.6 kilograms for Arabica per farmer. Policies should promote location-specific agronomic practices like intercropping and soil fertility management tailored to coffee type and ecological conditions. Capacity-building initiatives including input use, pest and disease management, and sustainable farming can reinforce efficiency gains. Supporting farmer groups and cooperatives could enhance knowledge sharing, coordinated input use, and market access, thereby reducing transaction costs and improving resource-use efficiency. The study employs a one-step SFA to estimate technical efficiency separately for Robusta and Arabica farmers, incorporating farm-level, institutional, and environmental factors to examine efficiency differentials across coffee types in Uganda.

Keywords

References

  • Abdulai, A., & Huffman, W. (2014). The Adoption and Impact of Soil and Water Conservation Technology: An Endogenous Switching Regression Application. Land Economics, 90(1), 26-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/le.90.1.26
  • Abebe, G. G. (2014). Off-Farm Income and Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Farmers in Ethiopia: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis (Master’s Thesis No. 862). European Erasmus Mundus Master Program: Agricultural Food and Environmental Policy Analysis (AFEPA), Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Addisie, G., & Tebarek, L. (2023). Upgrading Opportunities and Challenges for Small Coffee Producers in Sidama Region of Ethiopia. International Journal of Rural Management, 19(2), 234-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09730052221080884
  • Aheisibwe, A. R., Lokina, R. B., & Hepelwa, A. S. (2024). Efficiency in Uganda’s Seed Potato Systems. International Journal of Social Economics, 51(5), 682-697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-10-2021-0641
  • Aheisibwe, A. R., Lokina, R. B., & Hepelwa, A. S. (2018). Technical Efficiency in Seed Potato Production Systems in Uganda. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 10(3), 122-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v10i3.2322
  • Aigner, D., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
  • Ajema, S., & Nigussie, D. (2021). Technical Efficiency in Coffee–Enset Intercropping Systems in Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(2), 347–364.
  • Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442
  • Binam, J. N., Sylla, K., Diarra, I., & Nyambi, G. (2003). Factors Affecting Technical Efficiency among Coffee Farmers in Cote d’Ivoire: Evidence from the Centre West Region. African Development Review, 15(1), 66-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.00063
  • Bongers, G., Fleskens, L., Van de Ven, G., Mukasa, D., Giller, K., & Van Asten, P. (2015). Diversity in Smallholder Farms Growing Coffee and their Use of Recommended Coffee Management Practices in Uganda. Experimental Agriculture, 51(4), 594-614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479714000490
  • Bote, A. D., & Struik, P. C. (2011). Effects of Shade on Growth, Production and Quality of Coffee (Coffea Arabica) in Ethiopia. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 3(11), 336-341.
  • Botiabane, M. P., Zhou, L., Oluwatayo, I. B., Oyedokun, F. O., & Oyelana, A. A. (2017). Socioeconomic Analysis and Technical Efficiency among Smallholder Sorghum Farmers in Gamasemola Township of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 9(6), 17-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v9i6.2001
  • Bravo-Ureta, B. E., Solís, D., Moreira López, V. H., Maripani, J. F., Thiam, A., & Rivas, T. (2007). Technical Efficiency in Farming: A Meta-Regression Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 27(1), 57-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-006-0025-3
  • Chiputwa, B., Spielman, D. J., & Qaim, M. (2015). Food Standards, Certification and Poverty among Coffee Farmers in Uganda. World Development, 66, 400-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.006
  • Coelli, T.J. (1996). A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program. CEPA Working Paper 96/08, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale.
  • Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer Science & Business Media. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/b136381.
  • FAOSTAT. (2023). Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Database. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.
  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 120(3), 253-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
  • Getachew, B., & Temesgen, F. (2018). Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Coffee Production on Smallholder Farmers in Case of Sasiga and Limu Districts of East Wollega Zone. European Journal of Food Science and Technology, 6(2), 30–44.
  • ICO. (2020). 2020 Coffee Development Report: The Value of Coffee: Sustainability, Inclusiveness and Resilience of the Coffee Global Value Chain (CO FR/01/19E).
  • ICO. (2023). Coffee Report and Outlook. Retrieved from https://icocoffee.org/documents/cy202324/Coffee_Report_and_Outlook_December_2023_ICO.pdf.
  • ILO. (2024). Mapping the Coffee Value Chain in Uganda. International Labour Office. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/publications/mapping-coffee-value-chain-uganda.
  • Jena, P. R., Chichaibelu, B. B., Stellmacher, T., & Grote, U. (2012). The Impact of Coffee Certification on Small‐Scale Producers’ Livelihoods: A Case Study from the Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 43(4), 429-440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00594.x
  • Kathurima, C. W., Gichimu, B. M., Kenji, G. M., Muhoho, S. M., & Boulanger, R. (2009). Evaluation of Beverage Quality and Green Bean Physical Characteristics of Selected Arabica Coffee Genotypes in Kenya. African Journal of Food Science, 3(11), 365–371.
  • Kawuma, F. S. M. (2016). Institutional and Organizational Capacity for Transforming African Economies: The Challenges and Opportunities in the Transformation of the African Coffee Sub-sector [Conference paper]. 3rd International Conference on Modern Research in Management, Economics and Accounting, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Kumbhakar, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174411
  • Lutonja, E. (2023). Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Farmers in Tanzania: A Stochastic Frontier Approach. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics and Sociology, 41(12), 89-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2023/v41i122308
  • Massrie, K. D. (2025). Why is the Price of Coffee Rising Globally? Future Prospects for Ethiopian Coffee. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1545168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1545168
  • Mekonnen, D. K., Spielman, D. J., Fonsah, E. G., & Dorfman, J. H. (2015). Innovation Systems and Technical Efficiency in Developing‐Country Agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 46(5), 689-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12164
  • Mutua-Mutuku, M., Nguluu, S. N., Akuja, T., Lutta, M., & Bernard, P. (2017). Factors that Influence Adoption of Integrated Soil Fertility and Water Management Practices by Smallholder Farmers in the Semi-Arid Areas of Eastern Kenya. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 20(1), 141–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.2270
  • Nado, L., Ayele, M., & Tukela, B. (2021). Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Coffee Producers in Chiffre Woreda of Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Stochastic Frontier Approach. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 9(3), 33–39.
  • Nalunga, A. (2021). Essays on the Coffee Supply Chain in Uganda at Kansas State University, Manhattan (Doctoral Dissertation, Kansas State University).
  • Ngango, J., & Kim, S. G. (2019). Assessment of Technical Efficiency and its Potential Determinants among Small-Scale Coffee Farmers in Rwanda. Agriculture, 9(7), 161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9070161
  • Owusu, V., Abdulai, A., & Abdul-Rahman, S. (2011). Non-Farm Work and Food Security among Farm Households in Northern Ghana. Food Policy, 36(2), 108-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.09.002
  • Pothin, H. J., Houinsou, D., Femi, H. E., Victor, C., Emile, H. N., & Gauthier, B. (2025). Promoting Women Autonomy in the Agricultural Sector: Is Productivity Land Access Mode Wise and Gender Differentiated? Land Use Policy, 157, 107656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107656
  • Sebatta, C., Mugisha, J., Bagamba, F., Nuppenau, E., Domptail, S., Ijala, A., & Karungi, J. (2020). Efficiency and Possibilities for Arabica Coffee-Banana Management Systems Switching in the Mt. Elgon Landscape of Uganda. African Crop Science Journal, 28(3), 421–439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v28i3.7
  • Ssebunya, B. R., Morawetz, U. B., Schader, C., Stolze, M., & Schmid, E. (2019). Group Membership and Certification Effects on Incomes of Coffee Farmers in Uganda. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(1), 109-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jby022
  • Tambi, D. (2023). Determinants of Coffee Production in Melong Coffee Zone, Cameroon. Journal of Economic and Social Development, 10(1), 1-13.
  • Tamirat, N., & Tadele, S. (2023). Determinants of Technical Efficiency of Coffee Production in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Heliyon, 9(4), e15030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15030
  • UBOS. (2023). 2023 Statistical Abstract. Kampala, Uganda. Retrieved from https://www.ubos.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/2023-Statistical-Abstract.pdf.
  • UBOS. (2024). 2024 Statistical Abstract. Kampala, Uganda. Retrieved from https://www.ubos.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/The-Annual-Statistical-Abstract-2024.pdf.
  • UCDA. (2023b). Uganda Coffee Development Authority Mid-Term Review 2017–2030 Coffee Road Map for Uganda. Kampala, Uganda.
  • UCDA. (2023a). Uganda Coffee Development Authority Annual Coffee Report 2022/2023. Kampala, Uganda.
  • UNICEF. (2024). Overcoming the Challenges of Education in Uganda (UNICEF Policy Note No. 1/2024). Kampala, Uganda.
  • van Asten, P. J., Fermont, A., & Taulya, G. (2011b). Drought Is a Major Yield Loss Factor for Rainfed East African Highland Banana. Agricultural Water Management, 98(4), 541-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.005
  • van Asten, P. J., Wairegi, L., Mukasa, D., & Uringi, N. (2011a). Agronomic and Economic Benefits of Coffee–Banana Intercropping in Uganda’s Smallholder Farming Systems. Agricultural Systems, 104(4), 326-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.12.004
  • Wairegi, L. W., Bennett, M., Nziguheba, G., Mawanda, A., De Los Rios, C., Ampaire, E., Jassogne, L., Pali, P., Mukasa, D., & van Asten, P. J. (2018). Sustainably improving Kenya's Coffee Production needs more Participation of Younger Farmers with Diversified Income. Journal of Rural Studies, 63, 190-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.07.009
  • Wintgens, J.N. (2012). Coffee: Growing, Processing, Sustainable Production: A Guidebook for Growers, Processors, Traders and Researchers (3rd ed.). Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.

Downloads

Full-text downloads recorded for this article, by month.

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Natuha, P., Selejio, O., & Hepelwa, A. S. (2026). Estimating Technical Efficiency and Yield Losses Among Smallholder Coffee Farmers in Uganda: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 18(3(J), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v18i3(J).4977

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Phiona Natuha (Corresponding Author); Onesmo Selejio, Aloyce S Hepelwa (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 18 No. 3(J) (2026) Title unavailable View issue contents

Published

2026-10-29

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission